[PS3 ] UK: SONY may face £500k penalty

看板Modchip作者 (Savannah)時間13年前 (2011/04/28 00:22), 編輯推噓4(403)
留言7則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/44101/PSN-data-liability-disagreement Sony's T&C's deny responsibility, but ICO suggests otherwise; £500k fine possible SONY的使用者條款約定中訂有「免責條款」,但資訊專員辦公室指SONY仍可能面 臨50萬鎊的罰款 It has emerged that part of Sony's PSN terms and conditions claim that the company is not liable for any loss of user data. SONY在使用者條款中有特別聲明該公司對於任何使用者的資料流失不負任何責任 以下為條款相關文字節錄: "We exclude all liability for loss of data or unauthorised access to your data, Sony Online Network account or Sony Online Network wallet and for damage caused to your software or hardware as a result of using or accessing Sony Online Network," the terms state. 『倘若有任何未經授權的人或團體存取您的資料或您的線上電子錢包導致您在使 用 PSN服務時有任何硬體或軟體上的損失,本公司概.不.負.責』。(哇咧) However, speaking to Edge, the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) claims that Sony is accountable to stipulations outlined in the UK Data Protection Act which says that companies are obligated to keep users' details secure. 然而, ICO官員表示,根據英國資料保護法,SONY有義務妥善保管使用者的資料 。 "While we are unable to say where the data is being stored at present, if it was in the UK, this clause would not free them from their obligations under the UK Data Protection Act," ICO stated. "If we found a breach, one of the actions we could take would be to issue an undertaking, which is an agreement between the ICO and the company that if they are handling personal information they have to bring about set improvements in order for them to be compliant with the act. 「雖然我們無法確認資料是否還留在主機上,但在英國,這種可能性並不能免除 SONY在英國資料保護法中所規定的義務」, ICO官員如是說。「倘若我們發現該 公司違反相關規定,則我們可以要求他們承諾採取必要措施以符合法律的規定。 而該承諾將會是SONY與 ICO的協議。」 "If the company is not compliant with the act within a certain time limit, further action would be taken and we might consider an enforcement notice or issue a monetary penalty. "For serious breaches of the act, we can issue a monetary penalty up to £500,000." 「又若該公司無法在承諾期限內改善符合規定的狀況,則 ICO方面可以動用公權 力強制介入,或是科以罰金。對於嚴重違法的狀況,最高可以罰款50萬鎊。」 ****** 唉……換做是我們這邊還要用個資法去告, NCC那堆官員才不管這種事咧 -- ____ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _____ ____ (_ _)( \( )( \/ )( ___)( \( )(_ _)( _ )( _ \ _)(_ ) ( \ / )__) ) ( )( )(_)( ) / (____)(_)\_) \/ (____)(_)\_) (__) (_____)(_)\_) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.117.54.160

04/28 00:31, , 1F
台灣也是類似處理方式吧
04/28 00:31, 1F

04/28 00:32, , 2F
這種單方 顯然對一方不公平的定型化約定
04/28 00:32, 2F

04/28 00:32, , 3F
基本上是無效約定
04/28 00:32, 3F

04/28 00:51, , 4F
可以用消保法主張該條款無效
04/28 00:51, 4F

04/28 01:48, , 5F
這種單放面定型化契約都是訂爽的啦
04/28 01:48, 5F

04/28 01:48, , 6F
如果是可歸咎的,不能完全免責
04/28 01:48, 6F

04/29 10:15, , 7F
索尼罪大惡極,從合約就想陰消費者XD
04/29 10:15, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #1Dk4AyPY (Modchip)