[討論]手機的nand 顆粒是不是比較耐用?
如題
一般零售的SSD,
基本上都常常看到有故障快換的,
還有定期出現0E災情的品牌
可是在手機這領域好像大部分人並不care 用的是什麼nand品牌或是品質?
只要容量越大就越好,
觀察手機壞在nand的機率感覺也偏低
是說手機用上的記憶體顆粒體質都是比較好不容易壞的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 150.117.141.67 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1713860282.A.DAF.html
※ 編輯: ULTIMA1002 (150.117.141.67 臺灣), 04/23/2024 16:18:39
→
04/23 16:20,
1周前
, 1F
04/23 16:20, 1F
→
04/23 16:20,
1周前
, 2F
04/23 16:20, 2F
→
04/23 16:22,
1周前
, 3F
04/23 16:22, 3F
推
04/23 16:23,
1周前
, 4F
04/23 16:23, 4F
推
04/23 16:24,
1周前
, 5F
04/23 16:24, 5F
推
04/23 16:31,
1周前
, 6F
04/23 16:31, 6F
→
04/23 16:31,
1周前
, 7F
04/23 16:31, 7F
推
04/23 16:33,
1周前
, 8F
04/23 16:33, 8F
→
04/23 16:33,
1周前
, 9F
04/23 16:33, 9F
→
04/23 16:33,
1周前
, 10F
04/23 16:33, 10F
→
04/23 16:38,
1周前
, 11F
04/23 16:38, 11F
→
04/23 16:39,
1周前
, 12F
04/23 16:39, 12F
→
04/23 16:40,
1周前
, 13F
04/23 16:40, 13F
推
04/23 16:41,
1周前
, 14F
04/23 16:41, 14F
→
04/23 16:42,
1周前
, 15F
04/23 16:42, 15F
推
04/23 16:51,
1周前
, 16F
04/23 16:51, 16F
→
04/23 16:55,
1周前
, 17F
04/23 16:55, 17F
→
04/23 16:55,
1周前
, 18F
04/23 16:55, 18F
→
04/23 17:02,
1周前
, 19F
04/23 17:02, 19F
→
04/23 17:03,
1周前
, 20F
04/23 17:03, 20F
→
04/23 17:04,
1周前
, 21F
04/23 17:04, 21F
→
04/23 17:06,
1周前
, 22F
04/23 17:06, 22F
→
04/23 17:07,
1周前
, 23F
04/23 17:07, 23F
→
04/23 17:08,
1周前
, 24F
04/23 17:08, 24F
推
04/23 17:12,
1周前
, 25F
04/23 17:12, 25F
→
04/23 17:13,
1周前
, 26F
04/23 17:13, 26F
→
04/23 17:32,
1周前
, 27F
04/23 17:32, 27F
→
04/23 17:32,
1周前
, 28F
04/23 17:32, 28F
→
04/23 17:32,
1周前
, 29F
04/23 17:32, 29F
→
04/23 17:32,
1周前
, 30F
04/23 17:32, 30F
→
04/23 17:32,
1周前
, 31F
04/23 17:32, 31F
→
04/23 18:42,
1周前
, 32F
04/23 18:42, 32F
→
04/23 18:42,
1周前
, 33F
04/23 18:42, 33F
→
04/23 19:13,
1周前
, 34F
04/23 19:13, 34F
→
04/23 23:53,
1周前
, 35F
04/23 23:53, 35F
→
04/23 23:53,
1周前
, 36F
04/23 23:53, 36F
→
04/24 00:16,
1周前
, 37F
04/24 00:16, 37F
→
04/24 11:36,
1周前
, 38F
04/24 11:36, 38F