[新聞] 高資費老客戶怒求償 消保處:業者要配套消失
高資費老客戶怒求償 消保處:業者要配套
https://tw.news.appledaily.com/life/realtime/20180510/1351352
電信三雄不限資格499吃到飽引發全台搶辦熱潮,然而許多近一個月才續約高資費的老客
戶氣炸被當盤子,紛紛要求補償。行政院消保處副處長吳政學表示,法律上並未限制業者
後續不能推出新的優惠措施,只是在客戶觀感上,電信三雄應該思考配套措施來挽救老客
戶的認同感。
有網友痛批:「3月底才叫我改4月就結束的699方案,綁30個月,現在打爆我這10幾年『
老盤子』的臉。」也有人哀嚎:「上月問我是否續約,1399可優惠變999綁1年,結果馬上
來499吃到飽。」
吳政學坦言,電信業者推出降價優惠,有利後續消費者,法律上沒有非難性。舉例而言,
車商推出新的改款車型,舊車型降價促銷,消費者不能說因為先前買了舊車款而要求比照
降價。只不過電信業者應關照老客戶感受,推出新優惠時,也應思考配套措施來挽救老客
戶的認同感,否則留不住人。
消基會董事長游開雄昨也指出,中華電信推出此一母親節優惠方案,本是市場競爭下的行
銷手法,於法實難認有違法嫌疑,但對舊客戶而言,總不免有被犧牲或吃虧的感受,因此
建議業者,基於照顧老客戶及兼顧社會觀感下,針對舊客戶選擇更換此一優惠費率時,給
予大幅度減免違約金的配套作法。(林芳如/台北報導)
越找越大咖 看來中華要考慮提早退場囉~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.20.229.181
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1525945006.A.438.html
推
05/10 17:38, , 1F
05/10 17:38, 1F
噓
05/10 17:39, , 2F
05/10 17:39, 2F
推
05/10 17:39, , 3F
05/10 17:39, 3F
→
05/10 17:39, , 4F
05/10 17:39, 4F
噓
05/10 17:40, , 5F
05/10 17:40, 5F
推
05/10 17:40, , 6F
05/10 17:40, 6F
→
05/10 17:40, , 7F
05/10 17:40, 7F
推
05/10 17:40, , 8F
05/10 17:40, 8F
→
05/10 17:40, , 9F
05/10 17:40, 9F
推
05/10 17:40, , 10F
05/10 17:40, 10F
推
05/10 17:40, , 11F
05/10 17:40, 11F
推
05/10 17:41, , 12F
05/10 17:41, 12F
→
05/10 17:42, , 13F
05/10 17:42, 13F
推
05/10 17:42, , 14F
05/10 17:42, 14F
→
05/10 17:42, , 15F
05/10 17:42, 15F
噓
05/10 17:42, , 16F
05/10 17:42, 16F
→
05/10 17:43, , 17F
05/10 17:43, 17F
推
05/10 17:43, , 18F
05/10 17:43, 18F
→
05/10 17:44, , 19F
05/10 17:44, 19F

→
05/10 17:44, , 20F
05/10 17:44, 20F
→
05/10 17:44, , 21F
05/10 17:44, 21F
→
05/10 17:44, , 22F
05/10 17:44, 22F
推
05/10 17:45, , 23F
05/10 17:45, 23F
噓
05/10 17:45, , 24F
05/10 17:45, 24F
→
05/10 17:46, , 25F
05/10 17:46, 25F
推
05/10 17:46, , 26F
05/10 17:46, 26F
噓
05/10 17:46, , 27F
05/10 17:46, 27F
→
05/10 17:47, , 28F
05/10 17:47, 28F
→
05/10 17:49, , 29F
05/10 17:49, 29F
→
05/10 17:49, , 30F
05/10 17:49, 30F
推
05/10 17:49, , 31F
05/10 17:49, 31F
推
05/10 17:49, , 32F
05/10 17:49, 32F
推
05/10 17:50, , 33F
05/10 17:50, 33F
推
05/10 17:50, , 34F
05/10 17:50, 34F
推
05/10 17:53, , 35F
05/10 17:53, 35F
→
05/10 17:54, , 36F
05/10 17:54, 36F
噓
05/10 17:54, , 37F
05/10 17:54, 37F
推
05/10 17:55, , 38F
05/10 17:55, 38F
推
05/10 17:55, , 39F
05/10 17:55, 39F
噓
05/10 17:55, , 40F
05/10 17:55, 40F
→
05/10 17:57, , 41F
05/10 17:57, 41F
噓
05/10 17:57, , 42F
05/10 17:57, 42F
→
05/10 17:57, , 43F
05/10 17:57, 43F
推
05/10 18:03, , 44F
05/10 18:03, 44F
→
05/10 18:05, , 45F
05/10 18:05, 45F
推
05/10 18:17, , 46F
05/10 18:17, 46F
推
05/10 18:19, , 47F
05/10 18:19, 47F
推
05/10 18:30, , 48F
05/10 18:30, 48F
推
05/10 18:32, , 49F
05/10 18:32, 49F
→
05/10 18:32, , 50F
05/10 18:32, 50F
推
05/10 18:52, , 51F
05/10 18:52, 51F
噓
05/10 18:53, , 52F
05/10 18:53, 52F
噓
05/10 18:56, , 53F
05/10 18:56, 53F
噓
05/10 19:00, , 54F
05/10 19:00, 54F
噓
05/10 19:07, , 55F
05/10 19:07, 55F
→
05/10 19:07, , 56F
05/10 19:07, 56F
噓
05/10 19:27, , 57F
05/10 19:27, 57F
噓
05/10 20:18, , 58F
05/10 20:18, 58F
噓
05/10 20:33, , 59F
05/10 20:33, 59F
推
05/10 20:34, , 60F
05/10 20:34, 60F
噓
05/10 20:55, , 61F
05/10 20:55, 61F
→
05/10 20:55, , 62F
05/10 20:55, 62F
→
05/10 20:55, , 63F
05/10 20:55, 63F
→
05/10 20:55, , 64F
05/10 20:55, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):