Re: [新聞] 台廠國際廠拉警報! OPPO 2月台灣手機
就拿我手上的s7以及htc,小米來跟r9來比
oppo的優點就是
1.穩定(雖然不更新,但是也不會動不動閃退)
2.閃充(這個現在很多大廠都有了,不過我的s7的QC跟oppo比差滿多的)
3.全頻+ca(小米的硬傷,高cp值但非中華常常被閹割)
4.買就送保護貼跟清水套(原廠的貼的很好,也不會有什麼觸控不良的問題)
5.指紋辨識快
6.沒出過什麼大包(像10的受潮或者是s7的前鏡頭,而且r9銷量不比這兩支差)
7.ram,rom給得很足
缺點
1.SoC差
2.夜拍差
3.穩定不更新(我不知道這算不算缺點,因為我覺得根本沒差= =)
4.設定有點難,白名單什麼的有複雜度
5.我還真的想不到,硬要說的話是在這裡會被影射是工讀生吧
以前也是被這裡洗腦,想著SoC好代表著使用體驗一定都好,結果s7買了之後除了大型手
遊比較順以外,開啟app的速度還比r9慢= =,我只是想說人家大賣就一定要想盡辦法批評
,把所有優點都忽略,把缺點放大,甚至連原本是優點的地方都能酸(保護貼)
隨便戴別人帽子並不會讓你喜歡的廠商進步,為什麼看到人家賣得好不去學習人家的優點
,不管是體驗上,或者是行銷上都好,而是一再的攻擊別人,不解
本來也不想幫oppo說話,只是這版可以因為討厭的品牌而把好的也變成壞的,然後再給說
實話的人冠上工讀生的稱號,蠻微妙的。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.139.251.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1490180904.A.416.html
推
03/22 19:09, , 1F
03/22 19:09, 1F
推
03/22 19:11, , 2F
03/22 19:11, 2F
改一下語句
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:13:44
推
03/22 19:14, , 3F
03/22 19:14, 3F
→
03/22 19:14, , 4F
03/22 19:14, 4F
→
03/22 19:15, , 5F
03/22 19:15, 5F
至少閃退了三次,oppo用快一年都不知道有沒有三次
→
03/22 19:15, , 6F
03/22 19:15, 6F
oppo 20W,S7 15W,多少有差吧
→
03/22 19:15, , 7F
03/22 19:15, 7F
→
03/22 19:15, , 8F
03/22 19:15, 8F
還有做在後面的也很難用
原本是s7,10在考慮,看到受潮就決定買s7
→
03/22 19:15, , 9F
03/22 19:15, 9F
推
03/22 19:16, , 10F
03/22 19:16, 10F
→
03/22 19:16, , 11F
03/22 19:16, 11F
我買400貼到好,你去哪裡買的介紹一下,而且還會觸控不良
→
03/22 19:17, , 12F
03/22 19:17, 12F
我覺得你才黑吧,連原廠送保護貼都能酸= =
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:20:21
→
03/22 19:17, , 13F
03/22 19:17, 13F
→
03/22 19:17, , 14F
03/22 19:17, 14F
→
03/22 19:17, , 15F
03/22 19:17, 15F
→
03/22 19:18, , 16F
03/22 19:18, 16F
推
03/22 19:19, , 17F
03/22 19:19, 17F
→
03/22 19:19, , 18F
03/22 19:19, 18F
我有買閃充行動電源,一個好像1500左右
→
03/22 19:19, , 19F
03/22 19:19, 19F
→
03/22 19:19, , 20F
03/22 19:19, 20F
我有買啊,蠻好用的
推
03/22 19:20, , 21F
03/22 19:20, 21F
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:21:04
→
03/22 19:20, , 22F
03/22 19:20, 22F
→
03/22 19:20, , 23F
03/22 19:20, 23F
我只是想說,Oppo絕對有他值得這個價錢的原因,至少我覺得我多花了3000買s7體驗感完
全沒比較好
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:22:47
→
03/22 19:22, , 24F
03/22 19:22, 24F
Oppo被酸的特別嚴重吧?還是我眼睛業障重
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:23:29
推
03/22 19:23, , 25F
03/22 19:23, 25F
我哪句話這麼講了?
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 19:24:22
→
03/22 19:24, , 26F
03/22 19:24, 26F
推
03/22 19:24, , 27F
03/22 19:24, 27F
還有 138 則推文
還有 9 段內文
→
03/22 21:21, , 166F
03/22 21:21, 166F
推
03/22 21:27, , 167F
03/22 21:27, 167F
推
03/22 21:27, , 168F
03/22 21:27, 168F
→
03/22 21:27, , 169F
03/22 21:27, 169F
→
03/22 21:28, , 170F
03/22 21:28, 170F
推
03/22 21:34, , 171F
03/22 21:34, 171F
→
03/22 21:34, , 172F
03/22 21:34, 172F
推
03/22 21:58, , 173F
03/22 21:58, 173F
→
03/22 21:58, , 174F
03/22 21:58, 174F
推
03/22 22:08, , 175F
03/22 22:08, 175F
→
03/22 22:36, , 176F
03/22 22:36, 176F
推
03/22 22:37, , 177F
03/22 22:37, 177F
→
03/22 22:38, , 178F
03/22 22:38, 178F
→
03/22 22:46, , 179F
03/22 22:46, 179F
推
03/22 22:58, , 180F
03/22 22:58, 180F
說真的如果htc的10沒有受潮門我會想買htc10
我是不知道SoC的成本到底多少錢,不過p10跟s820會差到3000元嗎?如果沒有那r9的價格
沒很不合理吧?
※ 編輯: Xuxxin (223.139.251.165), 03/22/2017 23:24:28
→
03/22 23:26, , 181F
03/22 23:26, 181F
→
03/22 23:26, , 182F
03/22 23:26, 182F
推
03/23 01:03, , 183F
03/23 01:03, 183F
推
03/23 01:47, , 184F
03/23 01:47, 184F
→
03/23 01:47, , 185F
03/23 01:47, 185F
→
03/23 01:47, , 186F
03/23 01:47, 186F
推
03/23 04:39, , 187F
03/23 04:39, 187F
推
03/23 04:39, , 188F
03/23 04:39, 188F
推
03/23 04:40, , 189F
03/23 04:40, 189F
推
03/23 04:40, , 190F
03/23 04:40, 190F
推
03/23 04:43, , 191F
03/23 04:43, 191F
噓
03/23 10:19, , 192F
03/23 10:19, 192F
推
03/23 10:55, , 193F
03/23 10:55, 193F
推
03/23 16:03, , 194F
03/23 16:03, 194F
→
03/23 16:03, , 195F
03/23 16:03, 195F
→
03/23 16:03, , 196F
03/23 16:03, 196F
→
03/23 16:04, , 197F
03/23 16:04, 197F
→
03/23 16:04, , 198F
03/23 16:04, 198F
→
03/23 16:05, , 199F
03/23 16:05, 199F
→
03/23 16:06, , 200F
03/23 16:06, 200F
推
03/23 16:15, , 201F
03/23 16:15, 201F
→
03/23 16:15, , 202F
03/23 16:15, 202F
→
03/23 16:36, , 203F
03/23 16:36, 203F
→
03/23 21:58, , 204F
03/23 21:58, 204F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):