[問題] 為什麼紅米手機的價格可以壓的這麼低?
這幾年手機越來越多廠牌做中規低價了
但是要比紅米系列手機還殺的真的沒幾隻
像紅米note3 S650 32G 3G ram 5.5" 價格才5499
而且還有保固 7天鑑賞期
妥善率也蠻不錯的 也沒看到甚麼大災情
其它家像華碩 鴻海 宏碁也推一堆CP值的手機 都沒辦法做到那麼殺
紅米手機壓的那麼低的原因到底在哪?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.172.52.173
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1481270817.A.19B.html
推
12/09 16:08, , 1F
12/09 16:08, 1F
推
12/09 16:08, , 2F
12/09 16:08, 2F
推
12/09 16:10, , 3F
12/09 16:10, 3F
→
12/09 16:10, , 4F
12/09 16:10, 4F
推
12/09 16:12, , 5F
12/09 16:12, 5F
→
12/09 16:12, , 6F
12/09 16:12, 6F
推
12/09 16:14, , 7F
12/09 16:14, 7F
→
12/09 16:14, , 8F
12/09 16:14, 8F
推
12/09 16:16, , 9F
12/09 16:16, 9F
推
12/09 16:18, , 10F
12/09 16:18, 10F
→
12/09 16:18, , 11F
12/09 16:18, 11F
推
12/09 16:19, , 12F
12/09 16:19, 12F
→
12/09 16:20, , 13F
12/09 16:20, 13F
推
12/09 16:21, , 14F
12/09 16:21, 14F
推
12/09 16:22, , 15F
12/09 16:22, 15F
推
12/09 16:23, , 16F
12/09 16:23, 16F
推
12/09 16:23, , 17F
12/09 16:23, 17F
→
12/09 16:23, , 18F
12/09 16:23, 18F
推
12/09 16:26, , 19F
12/09 16:26, 19F
推
12/09 16:29, , 20F
12/09 16:29, 20F
推
12/09 16:32, , 21F
12/09 16:32, 21F
推
12/09 16:42, , 22F
12/09 16:42, 22F
→
12/09 16:42, , 23F
12/09 16:42, 23F
推
12/09 16:46, , 24F
12/09 16:46, 24F
→
12/09 16:48, , 25F
12/09 16:48, 25F
→
12/09 17:00, , 26F
12/09 17:00, 26F
推
12/09 17:01, , 27F
12/09 17:01, 27F
推
12/09 17:06, , 28F
12/09 17:06, 28F
推
12/09 17:11, , 29F
12/09 17:11, 29F
推
12/09 17:11, , 30F
12/09 17:11, 30F
推
12/09 17:11, , 31F
12/09 17:11, 31F
推
12/09 17:12, , 32F
12/09 17:12, 32F
推
12/09 17:13, , 33F
12/09 17:13, 33F
→
12/09 17:13, , 34F
12/09 17:13, 34F
→
12/09 17:16, , 35F
12/09 17:16, 35F
→
12/09 17:16, , 36F
12/09 17:16, 36F
推
12/09 17:21, , 37F
12/09 17:21, 37F
→
12/09 17:21, , 38F
12/09 17:21, 38F
推
12/09 17:39, , 39F
12/09 17:39, 39F
噓
12/09 17:46, , 40F
12/09 17:46, 40F
推
12/09 17:47, , 41F
12/09 17:47, 41F
推
12/09 18:07, , 42F
12/09 18:07, 42F
推
12/09 18:18, , 43F
12/09 18:18, 43F
→
12/09 18:18, , 44F
12/09 18:18, 44F
推
12/09 19:07, , 45F
12/09 19:07, 45F
→
12/09 19:07, , 46F
12/09 19:07, 46F
推
12/09 19:37, , 47F
12/09 19:37, 47F
→
12/09 19:37, , 48F
12/09 19:37, 48F
推
12/09 21:10, , 49F
12/09 21:10, 49F
推
12/09 21:51, , 50F
12/09 21:51, 50F
→
12/09 21:52, , 51F
12/09 21:52, 51F
→
12/09 22:35, , 52F
12/09 22:35, 52F
→
12/09 23:31, , 53F
12/09 23:31, 53F
→
12/09 23:37, , 54F
12/09 23:37, 54F
→
12/09 23:38, , 55F
12/09 23:38, 55F
→
12/09 23:38, , 56F
12/09 23:38, 56F
→
12/09 23:42, , 57F
12/09 23:42, 57F
→
12/09 23:42, , 58F
12/09 23:42, 58F
推
12/10 01:19, , 59F
12/10 01:19, 59F
推
12/10 01:22, , 60F
12/10 01:22, 60F
→
12/10 01:22, , 61F
12/10 01:22, 61F
→
12/10 02:47, , 62F
12/10 02:47, 62F
→
12/10 02:48, , 63F
12/10 02:48, 63F
→
12/10 02:48, , 64F
12/10 02:48, 64F
→
12/10 02:49, , 65F
12/10 02:49, 65F
→
12/10 02:50, , 66F
12/10 02:50, 66F
→
12/10 02:50, , 67F
12/10 02:50, 67F
推
12/10 04:24, , 68F
12/10 04:24, 68F
→
12/10 07:38, , 69F
12/10 07:38, 69F
→
12/10 12:46, , 70F
12/10 12:46, 70F
→
12/10 12:46, , 71F
12/10 12:46, 71F
推
12/10 19:27, , 72F
12/10 19:27, 72F
→
12/11 18:10, , 73F
12/11 18:10, 73F
推
12/13 14:47, , 74F
12/13 14:47, 74F
推
12/16 22:51, , 75F
12/16 22:51, 75F
→
12/16 22:52, , 76F
12/16 22:52, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):