[問題] 不玩遊戲,現在手機是否都已算效能過剩?
最近在物色新手機有這疑問
雖然大家都會強調晶片低階,效能不優
但這是否都是建立在玩遊戲的基礎上而言?
如果一般人不玩任何遊戲
單純滑滑批踢踢、臉書,看看水管等
市面上的中階手機是不是都可以算是效能過剩了?
更甚者是否記憶體反而比晶片更重要呢?
像我不玩手機遊戲的人
用s820跟s615的手機根本一樣
因為我根本用不滿他們的效能?
或者是低階晶片連基本的使用體驗都很糟糕呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.166.190.173
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1465028029.A.368.html
推
06/04 16:16, , 1F
06/04 16:16, 1F
→
06/04 16:17, , 2F
06/04 16:17, 2F
推
06/04 16:17, , 3F
06/04 16:17, 3F
※ 編輯: t048520 (1.166.190.173), 06/04/2016 16:18:26
推
06/04 16:18, , 4F
06/04 16:18, 4F
推
06/04 16:20, , 5F
06/04 16:20, 5F
→
06/04 16:22, , 6F
06/04 16:22, 6F
推
06/04 16:25, , 7F
06/04 16:25, 7F
→
06/04 16:25, , 8F
06/04 16:25, 8F
→
06/04 16:25, , 9F
06/04 16:25, 9F
→
06/04 16:29, , 10F
06/04 16:29, 10F
→
06/04 16:29, , 11F
06/04 16:29, 11F
→
06/04 16:29, , 12F
06/04 16:29, 12F
→
06/04 16:29, , 13F
06/04 16:29, 13F
→
06/04 16:29, , 14F
06/04 16:29, 14F
→
06/04 16:30, , 15F
06/04 16:30, 15F
→
06/04 16:33, , 16F
06/04 16:33, 16F
推
06/04 16:37, , 17F
06/04 16:37, 17F
推
06/04 16:43, , 18F
06/04 16:43, 18F
→
06/04 16:43, , 19F
06/04 16:43, 19F
推
06/04 16:48, , 20F
06/04 16:48, 20F
推
06/04 16:48, , 21F
06/04 16:48, 21F
→
06/04 16:48, , 22F
06/04 16:48, 22F
→
06/04 16:50, , 23F
06/04 16:50, 23F
推
06/04 17:01, , 24F
06/04 17:01, 24F
→
06/04 17:01, , 25F
06/04 17:01, 25F
→
06/04 17:03, , 26F
06/04 17:03, 26F
推
06/04 17:09, , 27F
06/04 17:09, 27F
推
06/04 17:16, , 28F
06/04 17:16, 28F
推
06/04 17:17, , 29F
06/04 17:17, 29F
→
06/04 17:17, , 30F
06/04 17:17, 30F
→
06/04 17:24, , 31F
06/04 17:24, 31F
→
06/04 17:24, , 32F
06/04 17:24, 32F
推
06/04 17:27, , 33F
06/04 17:27, 33F
推
06/04 17:30, , 34F
06/04 17:30, 34F
推
06/04 17:30, , 35F
06/04 17:30, 35F
推
06/04 17:32, , 36F
06/04 17:32, 36F
→
06/04 17:35, , 37F
06/04 17:35, 37F
→
06/04 17:35, , 38F
06/04 17:35, 38F
還有 32 則推文
→
06/04 18:57, , 71F
06/04 18:57, 71F
推
06/04 18:58, , 72F
06/04 18:58, 72F
推
06/04 19:00, , 73F
06/04 19:00, 73F
推
06/04 19:05, , 74F
06/04 19:05, 74F
→
06/04 19:05, , 75F
06/04 19:05, 75F
推
06/04 19:09, , 76F
06/04 19:09, 76F
→
06/04 19:09, , 77F
06/04 19:09, 77F
→
06/04 19:09, , 78F
06/04 19:09, 78F
推
06/04 19:09, , 79F
06/04 19:09, 79F
推
06/04 19:13, , 80F
06/04 19:13, 80F
推
06/04 19:14, , 81F
06/04 19:14, 81F
推
06/04 19:40, , 82F
06/04 19:40, 82F
推
06/04 19:43, , 83F
06/04 19:43, 83F
推
06/04 19:47, , 84F
06/04 19:47, 84F
推
06/04 19:56, , 85F
06/04 19:56, 85F
推
06/04 20:14, , 86F
06/04 20:14, 86F
→
06/04 20:14, , 87F
06/04 20:14, 87F
→
06/04 20:16, , 88F
06/04 20:16, 88F
推
06/04 20:20, , 89F
06/04 20:20, 89F
→
06/04 20:45, , 90F
06/04 20:45, 90F
→
06/04 20:45, , 91F
06/04 20:45, 91F
噓
06/04 20:45, , 92F
06/04 20:45, 92F
→
06/04 20:45, , 93F
06/04 20:45, 93F
→
06/04 20:46, , 94F
06/04 20:46, 94F
推
06/04 21:22, , 95F
06/04 21:22, 95F
推
06/04 21:29, , 96F
06/04 21:29, 96F
推
06/04 21:45, , 97F
06/04 21:45, 97F
推
06/04 22:16, , 98F
06/04 22:16, 98F
推
06/04 23:42, , 99F
06/04 23:42, 99F
推
06/05 00:49, , 100F
06/05 00:49, 100F
→
06/05 00:57, , 101F
06/05 00:57, 101F
→
06/05 00:57, , 102F
06/05 00:57, 102F
→
06/05 00:57, , 103F
06/05 00:57, 103F
推
06/05 01:29, , 104F
06/05 01:29, 104F
推
06/05 01:36, , 105F
06/05 01:36, 105F
推
06/05 01:52, , 106F
06/05 01:52, 106F
→
06/05 01:53, , 107F
06/05 01:53, 107F
推
06/05 02:14, , 108F
06/05 02:14, 108F
推
06/05 06:55, , 109F
06/05 06:55, 109F
推
06/07 20:55, , 110F
06/07 20:55, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):