Re: Re: [問題] 請求推薦這三家廠商的UI
LG的UI個人比較沒有深入使用,所以不評論
以現今的市場來看
拿到HTC手機的UI多半都是Sense6跟Sense7
所以HTC部份我就拿這兩個來講
至於三星
使用者多半拿到的UI是Note4那版的TouchWiz(忘記第幾版)
少數是新的S6的新UI,跟舊長壽機(如Note3/Note2的舊UI)
所以我大部分就拿Note4的那版來講
首先是HTC的Sense6/Sense7
重點: UI順暢度很強悍,硬體就算比較中階也比同級順暢
社交整合度高,BlinkFeed集於一身又不難用的方便性
Sense7加入的主題功能使可玩性小小提昇
缺點: 自訂性上的操作還是稍顯不足,主題的自訂功能未臻完善,
但整體上其實瑕不掩瑜
三星Note4這版的TouchWiz
重點: 自訂性上尚可,循環桌面/多重視窗/全能搜的方便性極高
(要循環桌面,必須關掉內建的Flipboard頁面)
順暢度尚可(GPU同級較差+2k拖累..有時會掉FPS)
缺點: UI肥大,TouchWiz吃掉的RAM著實不小..
另外因為S-PEN的關係,Note4會加重吃RAM的情形
"設定"這個內建的App也是吃RAM的元兇之一 (至少100MB的可用RAM)
如果剩餘的RAM不夠多時,多半就會小小卡頓
新版S6的TouchWiz整體雖然很順,但也失去了某些自訂性..
另外就是...大部分內建App的設計法..還是很舊很舊的思維= =
最後就是..因為SystemUI跟Framework幾乎被大改..有時會有奇怪毛病
這是我目前的理解與體會,供原PO參考XD 也歡迎各位指教~ ((逃
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HTC One.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.105.62
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1433421276.A.FDB.html
推
06/04 21:03, , 1F
06/04 21:03, 1F
→
06/04 21:03, , 2F
06/04 21:03, 2F
→
06/04 21:10, , 3F
06/04 21:10, 3F
推
06/04 21:16, , 4F
06/04 21:16, 4F
→
06/04 22:38, , 5F
06/04 22:38, 5F
→
06/04 22:38, , 6F
06/04 22:38, 6F
推
06/04 22:52, , 7F
06/04 22:52, 7F
→
06/04 23:03, , 8F
06/04 23:03, 8F
→
06/04 23:11, , 9F
06/04 23:11, 9F
→
06/04 23:11, , 10F
06/04 23:11, 10F
→
06/04 23:12, , 11F
06/04 23:12, 11F
→
06/04 23:12, , 12F
06/04 23:12, 12F
推
06/04 23:33, , 13F
06/04 23:33, 13F
→
06/04 23:34, , 14F
06/04 23:34, 14F
→
06/04 23:34, , 15F
06/04 23:34, 15F
→
06/04 23:35, , 16F
06/04 23:35, 16F
推
06/04 23:41, , 17F
06/04 23:41, 17F
→
06/04 23:42, , 18F
06/04 23:42, 18F
→
06/04 23:47, , 19F
06/04 23:47, 19F
→
06/04 23:47, , 20F
06/04 23:47, 20F
推
06/04 23:49, , 21F
06/04 23:49, 21F
→
06/04 23:50, , 22F
06/04 23:50, 22F
→
06/04 23:50, , 23F
06/04 23:50, 23F
→
06/04 23:50, , 24F
06/04 23:50, 24F
→
06/04 23:52, , 25F
06/04 23:52, 25F
→
06/04 23:52, , 26F
06/04 23:52, 26F
→
06/04 23:52, , 27F
06/04 23:52, 27F
→
06/04 23:53, , 28F
06/04 23:53, 28F
→
06/04 23:53, , 29F
06/04 23:53, 29F
→
06/04 23:53, , 30F
06/04 23:53, 30F
→
06/04 23:54, , 31F
06/04 23:54, 31F
→
06/04 23:55, , 32F
06/04 23:55, 32F
→
06/04 23:55, , 33F
06/04 23:55, 33F
→
06/04 23:55, , 34F
06/04 23:55, 34F
→
06/04 23:56, , 35F
06/04 23:56, 35F
→
06/04 23:56, , 36F
06/04 23:56, 36F
→
06/04 23:56, , 37F
06/04 23:56, 37F
→
06/04 23:56, , 38F
06/04 23:56, 38F
→
06/04 23:56, , 39F
06/04 23:56, 39F
→
06/04 23:57, , 40F
06/04 23:57, 40F
→
06/04 23:57, , 41F
06/04 23:57, 41F
→
06/04 23:58, , 42F
06/04 23:58, 42F
→
06/04 23:58, , 43F
06/04 23:58, 43F
→
06/04 23:58, , 44F
06/04 23:58, 44F
→
06/04 23:58, , 45F
06/04 23:58, 45F
→
06/04 23:59, , 46F
06/04 23:59, 46F
→
06/05 00:00, , 47F
06/05 00:00, 47F
→
06/05 00:01, , 48F
06/05 00:01, 48F
推
06/05 00:04, , 49F
06/05 00:04, 49F
推
06/05 07:09, , 50F
06/05 07:09, 50F
推
06/05 08:31, , 51F
06/05 08:31, 51F
推
06/05 08:43, , 52F
06/05 08:43, 52F
→
06/05 08:43, , 53F
06/05 08:43, 53F
→
06/05 08:44, , 54F
06/05 08:44, 54F
→
06/05 10:36, , 55F
06/05 10:36, 55F
→
06/05 10:37, , 56F
06/05 10:37, 56F
推
06/05 10:49, , 57F
06/05 10:49, 57F
→
06/05 10:58, , 58F
06/05 10:58, 58F
→
06/05 10:58, , 59F
06/05 10:58, 59F
→
06/05 10:58, , 60F
06/05 10:58, 60F
推
06/05 11:40, , 61F
06/05 11:40, 61F
→
06/05 11:56, , 62F
06/05 11:56, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):
問題
23
52