[閒聊] Bend test: Note3 vs. iPhone 6+已回收
自昨天開始有使用者表示自己的iPhone6+『彎掉了』之後
例如 http://t.co/Zru9uozhMU
『彎曲門』 #bentgate 也引起了各式各樣的討論與諷刺
LG當然沒忘了他們首款彎曲螢幕
http://t.co/cj5R49Rlkq
Unbox Therapy更親手折彎了一台iPhone+ (真的是錢太多……)
在最新的影片中更加入了Note3的抗彎曲測試 (抗彎曲測試 是我自己加的)
iPhone6+ http://youtu.be/znK652H6yQM
Samsung Note3 http://youtu.be/FwM4ypi3at0
(影片中甚至表示折Note3時用了更大的力氣)
測試結果是:Note3折不彎也沒斷
當然塑膠與金屬的延展性本來就相差甚大,
但在影片中呈現的同樣用很大的力氣去彎折時,
Note3的本體框架撐得住而不斷裂也的確很出色。
(Note3的背蓋本來就很有彈性,所以機體其他部份就很重要了)
過去比較常看到的應該是放在屁股口袋然後把螢幕『坐破』的情形,
但手機本體被壓到彎曲的確是較少見到。
有人提出說:現在的問題在於Apple採用了全金屬機身的同時,
有沒有針對機體本身架構特別強化以避免機身彎曲的問題?
其實我比較想看的是有沒有人要折一下hTC M7或M8的,這樣比可能比較公平 XD
不同手機被被彎的圖
http://www.cultofmac.com/297404/get-bent-shocking-history-bent-smartphones/
(……呃,iPhone家族的數量還是領先? XD)
其實若真的很用力去折、彎、或壓,應該也沒幾款手機可以撐得住不會變型。
而實際的問題就在於:在一般日常生活使用狀況下,
應該具有多少程度耐彎曲/擠壓的能力?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 149.159.27.253
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1411520997.A.A36.html
※ 編輯: hohiyan (149.159.27.253), 09/24/2014 09:13:27
推
09/24 09:15, , 1F
09/24 09:15, 1F
→
09/24 09:16, , 2F
09/24 09:16, 2F
※ 編輯: hohiyan (149.159.27.253), 09/24/2014 09:27:12
推
09/24 09:23, , 3F
09/24 09:23, 3F
→
09/24 09:23, , 4F
09/24 09:23, 4F
推
09/24 09:31, , 5F
09/24 09:31, 5F
→
09/24 09:36, , 6F
09/24 09:36, 6F
→
09/24 09:38, , 7F
09/24 09:38, 7F
→
09/24 09:38, , 8F
09/24 09:38, 8F
→
09/24 09:42, , 9F
09/24 09:42, 9F
推
09/24 09:43, , 10F
09/24 09:43, 10F
→
09/24 09:45, , 11F
09/24 09:45, 11F
→
09/24 09:52, , 12F
09/24 09:52, 12F
→
09/24 09:52, , 13F
09/24 09:52, 13F
推
09/24 09:57, , 14F
09/24 09:57, 14F
→
09/24 09:58, , 15F
09/24 09:58, 15F
→
09/24 09:58, , 16F
09/24 09:58, 16F
推
09/24 09:58, , 17F
09/24 09:58, 17F
推
09/24 10:01, , 18F
09/24 10:01, 18F
推
09/24 10:07, , 19F
09/24 10:07, 19F
→
09/24 10:21, , 20F
09/24 10:21, 20F
→
09/24 10:23, , 21F
09/24 10:23, 21F
→
09/24 10:27, , 22F
09/24 10:27, 22F
→
09/24 10:27, , 23F
09/24 10:27, 23F
→
09/24 10:28, , 24F
09/24 10:28, 24F
推
09/24 10:29, , 25F
09/24 10:29, 25F
→
09/24 10:30, , 26F
09/24 10:30, 26F
→
09/24 10:31, , 27F
09/24 10:31, 27F
推
09/24 10:31, , 28F
09/24 10:31, 28F
→
09/24 10:31, , 29F
09/24 10:31, 29F
→
09/24 10:32, , 30F
09/24 10:32, 30F
→
09/24 10:32, , 31F
09/24 10:32, 31F
→
09/24 10:33, , 32F
09/24 10:33, 32F
→
09/24 10:33, , 33F
09/24 10:33, 33F
→
09/24 10:33, , 34F
09/24 10:33, 34F
推
09/24 10:34, , 35F
09/24 10:34, 35F
推
09/24 10:37, , 36F
09/24 10:37, 36F
推
09/24 10:37, , 37F
09/24 10:37, 37F
推
09/24 10:49, , 38F
09/24 10:49, 38F
→
09/24 10:51, , 39F
09/24 10:51, 39F
→
09/24 10:51, , 40F
09/24 10:51, 40F
推
09/24 11:06, , 41F
09/24 11:06, 41F
→
09/24 11:06, , 42F
09/24 11:06, 42F
→
09/24 11:06, , 43F
09/24 11:06, 43F
→
09/24 11:06, , 44F
09/24 11:06, 44F
→
09/24 11:17, , 45F
09/24 11:17, 45F
推
09/24 11:19, , 46F
09/24 11:19, 46F
→
09/24 11:20, , 47F
09/24 11:20, 47F
→
09/24 11:21, , 48F
09/24 11:21, 48F
→
09/24 11:21, , 49F
09/24 11:21, 49F
推
09/24 11:28, , 50F
09/24 11:28, 50F
推
09/24 11:55, , 51F
09/24 11:55, 51F
→
09/24 11:56, , 52F
09/24 11:56, 52F
→
09/24 11:57, , 53F
09/24 11:57, 53F
推
09/24 12:07, , 54F
09/24 12:07, 54F
→
09/24 12:07, , 55F
09/24 12:07, 55F
推
09/24 12:12, , 56F
09/24 12:12, 56F
→
09/24 12:24, , 57F
09/24 12:24, 57F
推
09/24 12:38, , 58F
09/24 12:38, 58F
推
09/24 12:43, , 59F
09/24 12:43, 59F
→
09/24 12:44, , 60F
09/24 12:44, 60F
推
09/24 14:07, , 61F
09/24 14:07, 61F
推
09/24 14:09, , 62F
09/24 14:09, 62F
→
09/24 14:11, , 63F
09/24 14:11, 63F
推
09/24 14:26, , 64F
09/24 14:26, 64F
→
09/24 14:26, , 65F
09/24 14:26, 65F
推
09/24 14:35, , 66F
09/24 14:35, 66F
→
09/24 14:36, , 67F
09/24 14:36, 67F
推
09/24 15:10, , 68F
09/24 15:10, 68F
推
09/24 16:38, , 69F
09/24 16:38, 69F
推
09/24 17:08, , 70F
09/24 17:08, 70F
推
09/24 23:16, , 71F
09/24 23:16, 71F
推
09/25 00:15, , 72F
09/25 00:15, 72F
推
09/25 08:52, , 73F
09/25 08:52, 73F
→
09/25 08:52, , 74F
09/25 08:52, 74F
→
09/25 14:14, , 75F
09/25 14:14, 75F