Re: [外電] It's time for Erick Dampier
看到不簽P有可能是他狀況不好 就像去年一樣 在簽蛋皮之前
一堆人說他有問題 有興趣的人可以去翻一下文都還在
看看當時師婆講的話跟現在的態度 根本就是Copy過來而已
然後蛋皮真的有問題嗎? 事實是他幫熱火扛到了先發中鋒 聖誕大賽還幫頂了湖人三塔
那一場扛住拜能跟守擋拆守的精采 贏下重要比賽
今年偉德受到的保護是最好的 後場的人手充裕讓他可以精力充沛的用最好狀態上場殺爆
可是LC就上場時間一直降不下來 今天最多贏到32分 還是上了三十幾分鐘
照道理來講LBJ今年的替補也不少 八爺 健康的MM JJ都可以上 但是頂不上的是
他每場要打10~15Min的PF Bosh要打近40%時間的中鋒 這都不是他們該出現的位置
球季到一半狀態終於從高檔滑落 這是警訊 濕婆還在腦包 我就不想講了 去年的文都在
去看一看應該很熟析 我想大P現在應該可能很疑惑熱火為啥不簽他吧XD
※ 引述《loed ()》之銘言:
熱火缺什麼? 你知道!我知道!!獨眼龍也知道!!!
就好像只有濕婆不知道!? 記者問他為何不簽Dampier,
濕婆說:我覺得的現在陣容還不錯!?時間還早,當前的工作是把現有球員訓練好。
該文作者認為,簽Dampier一定比Anthony有用,特別是他的籃板能力;禁區嚇阻力也夠。
Dampier絕對能頂替大Z的先發地位,是個堪用的中鋒(不跟怪物中鋒比的話)。
花$1.4 million就能解決的問題,為何不去做???
It's time for Erick Dampier
: By Tom Haberstroh
: The Heat have already shaken up their depth chart at center this season,
: sliding Joel Anthony to the bench and inserting Zydrunas Ilgauskas into the
: starting five. Miami’s thinness up front has been a punching bag for Heat
: critics. But that perceived weakness could turn into a strength with one
: move: signing free agent Erick Dampier.
: The 14-year veteran offers the Heat a narrow set of skills as a big man but
: seeing that he’s a free agent expected to sign for the veteran minimum of
: $1.4 million, that’s par for the course. But what Dampier does do well --
: rebound and block shots -- should draw the Heat’s interest.
: When asked after Tuesday’s practice about possibility of adding Dampier to
: the frontcourt, head coach Erik Spoelstra expressed confidence in his current
: personnel.
: "Really, this is who we have," Spoelstra said. "We feel like we have enough.
: You know, we tweaked the rotation so that might change things up a little
: bit. But it’s far too early to make a real objective evaluation. My job is
: to coach these guys and worry about who’s in the gym."
: And there are some real worries. Along with their propensity to turn the ball
: over, rebounding has been a documented chink in the Heat's armor. Currently,
: the team's 23.0 offensive rebounding rate places them third to last in the
: NBA. It’s unfair to knock the 7-foot-3 Ilgauskas for not collecting
: offensive boards, considering he’s typically roaming the perimeter for
: pick-and-pops. But Anthony’s a different story. The 6-foot-9 center has been
: a below-average offensive rebounder this season, collecting 8.6 percent of
: available Heat missed shots. This, despite being firmly planted around the
: basket in offensive sets.
: For all the energy Anthony brings, his hyperactivity doesn’t translate to
: beating others to the live ball. On the defensive end, the UNLV product is
: too busy fly-swatting others shots, rather than preventing the opposition
: from acquiring second-chance points. In fact, the Heat’s defensive
: rebounding rate soars from 61.5 percent while Anthony’s on the floor to 70.9
: percent after he exits the game.
: At 6-foot-11, Dampier has proven to be a skilled rebounder in his NBA career,
: and earned the 2003-04 crown as the very best in the league. As a 34-year-old
: last season in Dallas, Dampier collected an estimated 11.6 percent of the
: Mavericks’ missed shots while he was on the floor, which ranked in the top
: 10 among regular centers. His glasswork has depreciated over the years but he
: should still be a substantial upgrade over Miami’s current alternatives.
: In contrast to Anthony, Dampier is long enough to block shots without
: relinquishing his box-out position or getting into foul trouble. The
: 35-year-old veteran was above average in both shot-blocking and defensive
: rebounding as a center in 2009-10, with 1.1 blocks and five defensive
: rebounds per game. The Heat may tout Anthony’s visible effort in blocking
: shots, but they’d be far better off overall with Dampier’s more
: conservative approach, which doesn’t leave the paint vulnerable to put-backs
: or routinely send opponents to the charity stripe.
: Offensively, Dampier represents a veritable upgrade to Anthony as well. They’
: re built from the same mold in that they each fall under the category of
: low-usage and offensively limited centers. But Dampier’s a more efficient
: option beneath the basket. When your scoring responsibility is restricted to
: easy put-backs, Anthony’s career 48 percent field goal percentage should be
: of great concern. However, Dampier has enjoyed a similar offensive role over
: the past four seasons in Dallas and has connected on no fewer than 62.4
: percent of his field goals in any of those seasons.
: But there are reasons why Dampier hasn’t been snapped up from the waiver
: wire yet. One is mileage. He's 35 years old, and through his 14 seasons, he
: has logged nearly 25,000 minutes in his NBA career. Concerns about his balky
: left knee are legitimate, as it hobbled him throughout 2009-10 and required
: minor arthroscopic surgery in May. Furthermore, a free-agent signing may send
: mixed signals to the locker room, one that Miami head coach Erik Spoelstra
: has been vocally reluctant to disrupt.
: The Heat have passed over Dampier’s services once this offseason before. But
: for the league minimum, he serves as a tangible upgrade over Anthony, at the
: very least. And on the high-end, he could challenge Ilgauskas for the
: starting gig -- and win it.
: For $1.4 million, it’s a deal that’s growing increasingly hard to pass up.
: http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/miamiheat/post/_/id/1190/its-time-for-dampier
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.185.233.113
推
02/13 15:26, , 1F
02/13 15:26, 1F
→
02/13 15:28, , 2F
02/13 15:28, 2F
推
02/13 15:30, , 3F
02/13 15:30, 3F
推
02/13 15:30, , 4F
02/13 15:30, 4F
推
02/13 15:31, , 5F
02/13 15:31, 5F
→
02/13 15:32, , 6F
02/13 15:32, 6F
推
02/13 15:33, , 7F
02/13 15:33, 7F
→
02/13 15:33, , 8F
02/13 15:33, 8F
推
02/13 15:34, , 9F
02/13 15:34, 9F
→
02/13 15:34, , 10F
02/13 15:34, 10F
推
02/13 15:36, , 11F
02/13 15:36, 11F
→
02/13 15:36, , 12F
02/13 15:36, 12F
→
02/13 15:37, , 13F
02/13 15:37, 13F
→
02/13 15:38, , 14F
02/13 15:38, 14F
→
02/13 15:38, , 15F
02/13 15:38, 15F
推
02/13 15:41, , 16F
02/13 15:41, 16F
噓
02/13 15:45, , 17F
02/13 15:45, 17F
推
02/13 15:45, , 18F
02/13 15:45, 18F
→
02/13 15:46, , 19F
02/13 15:46, 19F
推
02/13 15:47, , 20F
02/13 15:47, 20F
→
02/13 15:48, , 21F
02/13 15:48, 21F
推
02/13 15:49, , 22F
02/13 15:49, 22F
→
02/13 15:50, , 23F
02/13 15:50, 23F
→
02/13 15:51, , 24F
02/13 15:51, 24F
→
02/13 15:52, , 25F
02/13 15:52, 25F
推
02/13 17:20, , 26F
02/13 17:20, 26F
→
09/11 01:47, , 27F
09/11 01:47, 27F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):