Re: [情報] Heat Waived Jerry Stackhouse
※ 引述《dwyanes (小宇)》之銘言:
: 餓死抬頭
: 詳細再補充...
這算是個明智的決定,在沒有統治性中鋒坐鎮的熱火,中鋒海似乎是唯一解,
下面這篇外電是寫在釋出Stackhouse之前,他也是贊成釋出Stackhouse。
他的理由認為Stackhouse在Miller缺陣期間出賽時間就很少了(他只是個救火隊員),
更何況Miller也快回來了(下個月),因此,沒必要再裁掉擁有低位防守技巧的Magloire。
或者,另一個建議是先裁掉Magloire(他應該不會再跟別隊簽約),然後在球季中續簽。
顯然熱火是採取第一個選項裁掉Stackhouse。那麼裁掉Pittman呢?
Releasing a promising rookie like Pittman would definitely be a foolish move.
再者,Haslem本季真的有可能會報銷,應該可申請傷病例外條款(價值大概五百多萬?)
得再看看季中能不能再搞到一個可用之兵?
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/524942-heat-to-sign-dampier
Miami Heat Set To Sign Erick Dampier: Who Should They Release?
Who to cut?
The problem now is who to cut. Do they release Jamaal Magloire, who provided
a nice post presence on the defensive end tonight against the Pacers? Maybe.
Do they part with rookie Dexter Pittman? I hope not. What about Jerry
Stackhouse?
The best move in my mind is to release Stackhouse. He hasn’t played much in
Mike Miller’s absence. What’s the point of holding onto him, especially
considering Miller should return in a few weeks.
If the Heat don’t want to get rid of Stackhouse, they can choose to release
Magloire. They could then always re-sign him later in the season if they
desire. He isn’t likely to sign with another team anyway and Dampier is
essentially a better version of Magloire.
Releasing a promising rookie like Pittman would definitely be a foolish move.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.136.67.127
→
11/24 09:23, , 1F
11/24 09:23, 1F
推
11/24 09:27, , 2F
11/24 09:27, 2F
→
11/24 09:34, , 3F
11/24 09:34, 3F
→
11/24 09:35, , 4F
11/24 09:35, 4F
→
11/24 09:35, , 5F
11/24 09:35, 5F
推
11/24 09:36, , 6F
11/24 09:36, 6F
→
11/24 09:42, , 7F
11/24 09:42, 7F
→
11/24 09:43, , 8F
11/24 09:43, 8F
推
11/24 09:45, , 9F
11/24 09:45, 9F
推
11/24 09:47, , 10F
11/24 09:47, 10F
→
11/24 09:48, , 11F
11/24 09:48, 11F
→
11/24 09:48, , 12F
11/24 09:48, 12F
推
11/24 09:49, , 13F
11/24 09:49, 13F
→
11/24 09:50, , 14F
11/24 09:50, 14F
→
11/24 09:52, , 15F
11/24 09:52, 15F
→
11/24 09:53, , 16F
11/24 09:53, 16F
→
11/24 09:53, , 17F
11/24 09:53, 17F
推
11/24 09:54, , 18F
11/24 09:54, 18F
推
11/24 10:00, , 19F
11/24 10:00, 19F
推
11/24 10:02, , 20F
11/24 10:02, 20F
→
11/24 10:03, , 21F
11/24 10:03, 21F
→
11/24 10:04, , 22F
11/24 10:04, 22F
推
11/24 10:15, , 23F
11/24 10:15, 23F
→
11/24 10:16, , 24F
11/24 10:16, 24F
→
11/24 10:17, , 25F
11/24 10:17, 25F
→
11/24 10:17, , 26F
11/24 10:17, 26F
→
11/24 10:18, , 27F
11/24 10:18, 27F
→
11/24 10:22, , 28F
11/24 10:22, 28F
→
11/24 10:32, , 29F
11/24 10:32, 29F
→
11/24 10:38, , 30F
11/24 10:38, 30F
→
11/24 10:38, , 31F
11/24 10:38, 31F
推
11/24 10:46, , 32F
11/24 10:46, 32F
→
11/24 10:46, , 33F
11/24 10:46, 33F
→
11/24 10:49, , 34F
11/24 10:49, 34F
推
11/24 11:04, , 35F
11/24 11:04, 35F
推
11/24 11:18, , 36F
11/24 11:18, 36F
→
11/24 11:18, , 37F
11/24 11:18, 37F
推
11/24 11:24, , 38F
11/24 11:24, 38F
→
11/24 11:24, , 39F
11/24 11:24, 39F
→
11/24 11:27, , 40F
11/24 11:27, 40F
推
11/24 11:29, , 41F
11/24 11:29, 41F
→
11/24 11:30, , 42F
11/24 11:30, 42F
※ 編輯: loed 來自: 114.136.67.127 (11/24 11:30)
推
11/24 11:30, , 43F
11/24 11:30, 43F
推
11/24 12:24, , 44F
11/24 12:24, 44F
推
11/24 19:11, , 45F
11/24 19:11, 45F
→
12/10 18:06,
5年前
, 46F
12/10 18:06, 46F
→
04/19 17:49,
5年前
, 47F
04/19 17:49, 47F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):