[外電] The Four Horsemen: Deron Williams
The four horsemen: Deron Williams
原文:http://www.mavs.com/the-four-horsemen-deron-williams/
It says a lot that one of the things Deron Williams is looking forward to
most about his time in Dallas is the franchise’s stability.
Since the 2008-09 season, the Mavs organization has revolved around
the core of star player Dirk Nowitzki, head coach Rick Carlisle,
general manager Donnie Nelson, and owner Mark Cuban.
Carlisle, the newest of the bunch, is one of just three coaches who has
been with the same team since the beginning of the 2010-11 season.
There is certainly plenty of tenure in Dallas.
小胖對小牛隊最期待的一件事情就是團隊內部的穩定性。
小牛的運作核心:Dirk, 卡帥, 小尼, Cuban 四人從08-09賽季開始合作至今
同時卡帥是從10-11賽季至今唯三還待在同隊的教練。
That has to be appealing for someone like Williams, who played for four
different coaches between 2011 and 2015 in Brooklyn: Avery Johnson,
P.J. Carlesimo, Jason Kidd, and most recently Lionel Hollins.
A point guard is the closest thing in basketball to an NFL quarterback,
whose success in football is dependent not only on his own ability,
but also the continuity of the program. Constantly adjusting to new systems
year after year in either sport can stunt a young player’s development or,
in the veteran Williams’ case, could potentially result in a drop-off in stats.
Last season he shot a career-low 38.7 percent from the field with a
50.4 true shooting percentage.
這對小胖來說無疑是非常吸引人的,因為他從2011到2015已經和四位不同教練
合作過:Avery Johnson, P.J. Carlesimo, Jason Kidd, Lionel Hollins.
PG就像是美式足球裡面的四分衛,不只是個人能力,一個體系運作的持續性也
會影響他們的表現。
一直在適應新體系的小胖可能是因此狀況下跌,
上賽季他38.7%的命中率是生涯新低,TS則是50.4%
But that isn’t the case in Dallas, where the Mavs have run a pick-and-roll
offense centered around Nowitzki and a bevy of guards for many years now,
and the results have clearly been positive for nearly every player in that
position. However, after starting four different point guards in each of the
last four seasons (with cameos by Mike James and Jameer Nelson), the Mavs
must be excited about the possibility of having Williams act as a mainstay
at the point guard spot moving forward. Plugging him into the pick-and-roll,
a system in which he thrived in Utah during the first half of his career, could
very well lead to a dramatic boost in Williams’ numbers.
小牛隊的狀況完全不一樣,小牛長期以Dirk為中心,和許多不同的後衛搭配
玩P&R的進攻系統已經證明大部份參與的後衛都能打出正面的效果。
連續四個賽季用不同先發PG(還沒算上Mike James, Jameer Nelson)的小牛
將會非常期待小胖成為他們的新主控。
小牛以P&R為主的進攻系統可能會讓小胖迎來爆發,因為P&R正是他在
爵士隊輝煌時期的成名武器。
In fact, regardless of system, point guards have nearly always played well
next to Nowitzki. Below is a chart showing the shooting percentages of
12 of the 17 starting point guards the German has played with who posted
at least a 57.0 true shooting percentage, sorted by TS%.
(All numbers from Basketball-Reference.com.)
事實上幾乎所有PG在Dirk身邊都能打得很好。
以下是總共17名與Dirk合作的先發PG中的12名球員的數據:
PLAYER SEASON FG% 3P% FT% TS%
JASON TERRY 2004-05 50.1% 42.0% 84.4% 60.6%
STEVE NASH 2000-01 48.7% 40.6% 89.5% 60.3%
STEVE NASH 2001-02 48.3% 45.5% 88.7% 60.2%
STEVE NASH 1999-00 47.7% 40.3% 88.2% 60.1%
JOSE CALDERON 2013-14 45.6% 44.9% 82.5% 59.6%
DEVIN HARRIS 2007-08 48.3% 35.7% 82.1% 59.2%
STEVE NASH 2003-04 47.0% 40.5% 91.6% 59.0%
JASON KIDD 2009-10 42.3% 42.5% 80.8% 57.7%
STEVE NASH 2002-03 46.5% 41.3% 90.9% 57.6%
JASON TERRY 2005-06 47.0% 41.1% 80.0% 57.5%
DARREN COLLISON 2012-13 47.1% 35.3% 88.0% 57.5%
DEVIN HARRIS 2006-07 49.2% 28.0% 82.4% 57.4%
In the same way Carlisle’s offense made Dallas paradise for starting
point guards, so too did Don Nelson’s offense, which featured four times
a point guard with a true shooting percentage higher than 60.0. This isn’t
a guarantee that Williams will put up monster numbers this season, but
there’s more than a decade’s worth of evidence that he will fit just fine in
Carlisle’s offense. What’s most intriguing is that the name at the top of
that list, Jason Terry, was also the last starting point guard for the
Mavericks who could consistently create his own offense. Devin Harris was able
to do the same thing in the 2007-08 season but was eventually traded for
Jason Kidd. Kidd and Jose Calderon were both excellent players (Kidd, obviously,
is a future Hall of Famer) but there’s some added value in players like
Williams and Terry who, if the play breaks down, can still generate a good
shot.
同樣的,卡帥的進攻戰術也讓達拉斯成為先發PG的天堂,這並不是保證下季小胖
能大爆發,但是有超過十年的證據來證明他能夠融入卡帥的進攻系統。
更讓人期待的是表格中的地名:Jet,是達拉斯最後一位有進攻創造力的先發PG
小哈在07-08年也做的到但是後來就被交易換來Kidd了。
Kidd和Calderon都是很優秀的球員,但是小胖和Jet這種能單打的PG在卡帥的體系
中會有更高的價值。
In that regard, what makes this a new case is the fact that the Mavs didn’t
necessarily sign Williams strictly to play next to Nowitzki. Primarily, they
seized the opportunity to sign him because he’s a good player. Secondary is
his fit within the pick-and-roll offense. Third, however, is his ability to run the
offense but also to carry some of the offensive load himself.
這樣看來,或許有另一個角度來解釋小牛隊與小胖的簽約:小牛簽他並不是
要他在Dirk身邊打球,而是因為 1. 他是一個好球員 2. 他很適合P&R
3. 他還具備一些自走砲能力
Earlier this summer, Dallas had an entire roster assembled but with no starting
point guard to orchestrate the offense. J.J. Barea and Raymond Felton both
made positive impacts off the bench last season, and Devin Harris played
shooting guard a majority of the time, but there was a need for a starting-
caliber point who could score. Chandler Parsons will have the ball in his hands
plenty this season,
but it’s still an obvious plus to have another player on the roster who can
make things happen. And because both players can facilitate and score, it makes
defending them that much more difficult. Both players can also catch and shoot
from behind the arc. They fit very well together.
這個休賽季小牛隊一度缺少先發PG,JJB和肥頓上個賽季都有好表現,小哈主要是
打SG,但是他們還是沒辦法頂上先發PG的缺口。CP25將會有大量的持球時間,但
還是缺少一個能安穩地把球送到他手上的人。如果能有人和CP合作,兩人都具備
進攻創造力和C&S的能力,他們將會完美搭配、讓防守者很頭痛。
That’s a huge positive for the Mavericks for several reasons. With Williams
and Parsons both in the mix, Carlisle has the option to keep at least one of
them on the floor at all times, giving Dallas a reliable, proven playmaker to
manage the flow of the game. Barea can also be counted on to control the tempo
and has the chance to continue his role as a terrific change-of-pace option off
the bench. But the other benefit has to do with Parsons’ health status. The
forward maintains that he’ll be ready to go by the time the season starts, but
if there’s a setback in his recovery process, the Mavs know they’ll still
have a capable ball-handler to run the offense. Dallas will not be relying too
much on one player this season, and that could make everyone’s job easier.
同時擁有CP25和小胖將會有許多好處。卡帥可以讓他們兩人至少一人待在場上,讓
場上一直有個可靠的進攻組織者,JJB將會是錦上添花,並且繼續從板凳出發,
保持他亂刀流的特色。另外,CP25的健康狀況也是一個考量的點,如果他不能趕上
開季,小牛隊至少還有小胖可以處理球、發動進攻。有眾多進攻好手的小牛隊將
不會依賴單一球員,而讓大家的負擔更輕鬆。
And because there are so many threats in the starting lineup — Williams,
Nowitzki, Parsons, and Wes Matthews — all of the Mavericks’ primary scorers
should have some extra room to operate. Unlike on a more traditional team
featuring one or two “go-to” guys, multi-dimensional offensive players who
can create their own offense, Dallas now has four of them.
It will now be more difficult for defenses to focus in on any single player,
let alone double-team him. Dirk, for example, faced many doubles last season,
particularly in the low post along the baseline. But good luck doing that with
players like Williams, Matthews, and Parsons spotting up around the perimeter.
先發陣容有許多進攻好手:D-Will, Dirk, CP, Wes。小牛不像是傳統的隊伍依靠一到
兩個進攻核心,而是有四個能自行創造進攻的箭頭。防守者將會更難一對一防守他們
任何一個人,也不知道該不該包夾。像是去年的Dirk就不斷遭到包夾,今年防守者
如果想繼續包夾他,那就祝他們好運吧! (望向旁邊埋伏的Wes, CP, D-Will)
That should especially benefit Williams, who has spent the last four-plus
seasons in a system which struggled to create space for its players. Going back
to the 2010-11 season, when the Nets traded for Williams, the club has only
shot better than 35.0 percent on 3s as a team twice. The Mavs, meanwhile, have
shot below 35.0 percent from deep just twice this millennium. That will make
Williams, who has shot 37.2 percent from deep across the last three seasons,
that much more dangerous in Dallas’ wide-open offense.
這將會尤其讓小胖如魚得水。過去四個賽季他都在一個很難為球員拉開進攻空間的
進攻體系中。10-11賽季剛得到小胖的籃網隊只有兩次全隊三分命中率超過35%。
反之小牛隊從21世紀以來只有兩次低於35%。過去三個賽季三分命中率37.2%的小胖
在小牛體系中將會更致命。
To better illustrate this, here’s an example of Brooklyn’s pick-and-roll
offense from last season. Thaddeus Young is a fine shooter as a power forward,
but the Nets ran a lot of 3-out, 2-in offense last season, as opposed to the
4-out system Dallas has run for Nowitzki’s entire career. By that, I mean
their two big men play inside the arc, closer to the basket.
While that style of play certainly has its merits, it occasionally
results in a crowded lane on drives to the rim.
這裡有個去年籃網隊P&R的例子:Thaddeus Young是個及格的PF射手,但是籃網
採用許多三外兩內的戰術,兩個大個子塞在籃下有時會造成切入的路線太擁擠。
相反的Dirk的整個生涯小牛隊都很愛用四外一內。
http://imgur.com/mQ7Hr4P

More bodies closer to the basket played a role in Williams’ field goal
percentage dropping to 45.7 percent from within three feet last season,
according to Basketball-Reference.
But that doesn’t mean Williams simply can’t finish: He shot 64.6
percent inside of three feet in 2013-14, playing in what eventually became
Jason Kidd’s wide-open four-out system, featuring Paul Pierce at the power
forward spot. That system resulted in floor spacing like this.
根據 Basketball-Reference ,上一季,籃網隊的戰術使得籃下太多球員,小胖三呎
之內的命中率降到45.7%,但這並不代表他籃下終結能力很差,
13-14球季,Jason Kidd 讓Paul Pierce拉上大前鋒打四外一內的戰術,
小胖三呎之內的命中率是64.6%,如下圖。
http://imgur.com/VndFt1a

Pierce, the power forward, can shoot well enough to keep his defender, Josh
McRoberts, from sinking down far enough to help against Williams’ drive. This
is the way many teams in the league, including and especially the Mavs, space
the floor in today’s game, and an open lane should making finishing at the rim
a whole lot easier for the new Mavs point guard.
四號位Pierce的投射能力使得他的防守者Josh McRoberts沒辦法下沈太多去阻擋
小胖的切入。這是現今聯盟許多隊伍,包括小牛隊,拉開空間的打法。
小牛隊能拉出一條康莊大道給他們新來的PG。
On the other side of the ball, Williams gives the Mavs an element the club has
missed for a few seasons. At 6-foot-3, 200 pounds, Williams has good size for a
point guard and the strength to potentially defend “up” a position at
shooting guard. That could come in handy, as Carlisle frequently plays multiple
point guards at the same time.
Last season, Rajon Rondo had the length to defend either guard spot, but
not since Kidd played the 1 have the Mavs had a starting point guard who could
combine excellent offensive ability with defensive versatility.
而小胖也能給予小牛近幾季缺乏的一些元素:6-3, 200磅的他有絕佳的身材跟對抗性可以
提供一號位上的防守,同時也有對位SG的潛力。這對這幾年很愛把一堆後衛擺在場上的
卡帥來說無疑是非常有幫助的,去年有可以防守後場兩個位置的Rondo,但自從Kidd離開
以後小牛隊已經很久沒有能在進攻端和防守端都能有良好貢獻的先發PG了。
Hopefully both Williams and the Mavs can find the stability they’re looking
for, because on paper this looks like it has the potential to be a pretty
special union.
希望小胖跟小牛隊都能找到彼此的歸宿,而他們看起來確實有潛力成為一個很特別的搭配。
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
這是一篇系列文,分別寫了D-Will, Wes, CP, Dirk
本來想全部翻完的,不過開季前感覺來不及QQ 看看開打前能寫多少就多少吧!
D-Will健康時候的球風我個人覺得真的非常適合Dirk和卡帥,
一直都蠻喜歡看他的Crossover, 投籃姿勢也很順暢,
下一季其實還蠻期待他能有好表現的!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.48.73
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Mavericks/M.1443264696.A.13A.html
推
09/26 19:00, , 1F
09/26 19:00, 1F
推
09/26 19:33, , 2F
09/26 19:33, 2F
推
09/26 19:44, , 3F
09/26 19:44, 3F
→
09/26 19:44, , 4F
09/26 19:44, 4F
推
09/26 19:48, , 5F
09/26 19:48, 5F
推
09/26 19:54, , 6F
09/26 19:54, 6F
推
09/26 20:00, , 7F
09/26 20:00, 7F
推
09/26 20:01, , 8F
09/26 20:01, 8F
→
09/26 20:03, , 9F
09/26 20:03, 9F
推
09/26 20:16, , 10F
09/26 20:16, 10F
推
09/26 20:26, , 11F
09/26 20:26, 11F
推
09/26 20:32, , 12F
09/26 20:32, 12F
推
09/26 21:10, , 13F
09/26 21:10, 13F
推
09/26 21:59, , 14F
09/26 21:59, 14F
推
09/26 23:25, , 15F
09/26 23:25, 15F
→
09/27 04:49, , 16F
09/27 04:49, 16F
→
09/27 04:49, , 17F
09/27 04:49, 17F
推
09/27 09:36, , 18F
09/27 09:36, 18F
噓
09/27 09:46, , 19F
09/27 09:46, 19F
推
09/27 10:09, , 20F
09/27 10:09, 20F
→
09/27 10:09, , 21F
09/27 10:09, 21F
→
09/27 10:27, , 22F
09/27 10:27, 22F
→
09/27 10:29, , 23F
09/27 10:29, 23F
推
09/27 10:39, , 24F
09/27 10:39, 24F
推
09/27 15:24, , 25F
09/27 15:24, 25F
→
09/27 15:25, , 26F
09/27 15:25, 26F
→
09/27 16:12, , 27F
09/27 16:12, 27F
→
09/27 16:12, , 28F
09/27 16:12, 28F
推
09/27 18:50, , 29F
09/27 18:50, 29F
推
09/27 20:54, , 30F
09/27 20:54, 30F
推
09/27 21:06, , 31F
09/27 21:06, 31F
推
09/27 21:20, , 32F
09/27 21:20, 32F
→
09/27 21:20, , 33F
09/27 21:20, 33F
推
09/27 22:11, , 34F
09/27 22:11, 34F
→
09/27 22:12, , 35F
09/27 22:12, 35F
推
09/27 22:48, , 36F
09/27 22:48, 36F
推
09/28 06:08, , 37F
09/28 06:08, 37F
推
09/28 13:01, , 38F
09/28 13:01, 38F
推
09/28 13:51, , 39F
09/28 13:51, 39F
推
09/28 14:05, , 40F
09/28 14:05, 40F
→
09/28 14:05, , 41F
09/28 14:05, 41F
→
09/28 14:05, , 42F
09/28 14:05, 42F
推
09/28 14:07, , 43F
09/28 14:07, 43F
→
09/28 14:07, , 44F
09/28 14:07, 44F
推
09/28 14:44, , 45F
09/28 14:44, 45F
→
09/28 17:21, , 46F
09/28 17:21, 46F
推
09/29 00:03, , 47F
09/29 00:03, 47F
推
09/29 13:21, , 48F
09/29 13:21, 48F
→
09/29 13:27, , 49F
09/29 13:27, 49F
推
10/01 10:34, , 50F
10/01 10:34, 50F
討論串 (同標題文章)