[外電] FISH:Brendan Haywood's Flop Must Stop
上一篇大家在討論黑霧
剛好有外電就翻了~
I'd decided to retire my distaste with Big Wood’s late-last-season “I just
work here" declaration for a few reasons. Hey, maybe it’s been taken a
bit out of context. Or, hey, maybe he had a right to subtly express his
playing-time unhappiness. And heck, it’s a new season worthy of a fresh
start.
(作者決定拋棄他對黑霧上季後半段所發表的"我只是在這工作"所感到的厭惡
這件事已經過了一段時間，而且黑霧也有權表達上場時間的不滿，
另外這是個值得期待的新球季)
Most of all: The Mavs had enough faith in him to keep him while promising him
this year’s starting center job … to acquire “Starter 1A’’ Tyson
Chandler without expressed concerns about Haywood’s fragile psyche … and to
broadcast for all to hear how “elite’’ deep Dallas now is at the center
position.
(原本小牛隊黑霧有足夠的信心並承諾他會是這一季的先發中鋒...
但當小牛得到拳王時...
無疑是害怕黑霧那脆弱的...心靈...
此外，現在大家都說小牛隊在中鋒這個位置上是很堅強的!)
But my “I just work here’’ cynicism is mushrooming back. Its fertilizer is
the substandard performance of Haywood through two weeks of the NBA season.
(在開季兩個星期後，黑霧那不合格的表現...
"I just work here"的言論，聽起來就像個笑話...)
Fact: Dallas has played five games. In four of those games, Haywood has
scored two points or fewer.
(事實上，小牛隊已經打了五場球，
黑霧有上場的比賽只得了兩分或更少...)
You won’t find Mavs staffers saying much about this on the record. Big Wood
needs to be handled properly. The investment in him is sizeable (a guaranteed
five years and $41.745 million, and a possible sixth year at $10.5 million
more). The plan is for him to be here long-term, to fulfill the words we all
uttered about him last spring:
(小牛隊全隊上下沒有人對於這個記錄談論過多...
黑霧需要被嚴格的控管，因為對於他的投資是相當大的...
這約是為了讓他長期的留在達拉斯，去實現去年春天我們所說的....)
“The Best Center The Mavs Have Ever Had.’’
("小牛隊史上最棒的中鋒"
..........................)
Let me get to the money first. And then we’ll get to the damning stats.
(先給我錢，然後你們會看到可怕的數據!!!!)
Haywood’s deal over six years averages $8.3 mil per season (including that
insta-expiring sixth year that benefits the Mavs). This season, he’ll made
$6.9 mil. (Here is the detailed breakdown, as first reported by
DallasBasketball.com’s David Lord: 2010-11 $6,900,000; 2011-12 $7,624,500;
2012-13 $8,349,000; 2013-14 $9,073,500; 2014-15 $9,798,000; 2015-16
unguaranteed and a trade chip of $10,522,500.)
Is that too much for a top-10 center? Nope.
(黑霧的合約超過六年，平均薪資達到8.3M
這對於一個聯盟前10的中鋒，會太貴嗎???
一點都不!!!)
Is that a contract that invites buyer’s remorse if Big Wood is going to
score two points a game in four out of every five outings? Damn straight.
(當Cuban看到黑霧的數據會不會感到自責咧???
真是個糟透的決定...)
Haywood arrived in Dallas last February as if he was ecstatic to have escaped
Washington. His half-season in Dallas -- a PER of 16.1, a 56.4 shooting
percentage, 10.1 rebounds/36, a team-best 2.8 blocks/36, a lack of sloppiness
with 1.6 turnovers/36 – merited the positive talk and the attractive
contract.
(黑霧在二月時，欣喜若狂的離開華盛頓
去年留下的數據是每場16.1分 五成六四的投籃命中率
10.1個籃板 全隊最佳的2.8個火鍋以及1.6個失誤
理所當然得讓他在談新合約時十分順利...)
But let me dig up what I wrote about Brendan in training camp:
(容許我找出我在訓練營時對於黑霧的評論)
Why do some of those numbers feel fluky?
(為什麼那些數據看起來有點靠運氣???)
Is it because Haywood is sort of an odd bird … what an old-time coach might
critically call a “Good-Time Charlie’’? Is it because he seems kind of
sensitive, in need of a bone thrown, in need of a hug?
(這是因為黑霧是種怪鳥嗎?
還是因為他的多愁善感，需要大家的擁抱咧?)
Right now, though, it’s not about what the Mavs need to give Haywood; it’s
a Kennedyesque “what Haywood can do for the Mavs.’’
現在要討論的不是小牛隊需要給黑霧什麼
而是
小牛隊什麼改變?)
Take away the effort against the Clippers (six rebounds, 10 points and three
blocks) and here’s what you’re getting out of Big Wood:
Against Charlotte: three rebounds and two points
Against Memphis, four rebounds and zero points
Against Denver, four rebounds and two points
Against Denver again, seven rebounds and zero points
黑霧今年慘不忍睹的數據
Listen, I can appreciate and even champion a center who “does the little
things’’; DallasBasketball.com did it for a half-decade of Erick Dampier
screen-setting. But for Haywood, that’s four games … games against teams
missing big men like Zach Randolph, Chris Andersen, Kenyon Martin and Nene …
games in which fate and fortune invited Big Wood to thrive …
(聽著我能接受並且支持"做一些事情的中鋒"就像蛋皮....
但黑霧在這四場比賽...
根本沒有遇到什麼大個子...
彷彿就是要讓黑霧刷數據的....)
And he barely even showed up.
(而他就只負責走上球場...)
Like I say, the Mavericks right now have so many problems that you could
throw a dart – drunk and blind-folded – and pinpoint one worthy of
dissection. Part of Brendan’s ineffectiveness can certainly be tied to the
adjustment he’s making while being outplayed by Chandler, who has stolen his
starting job. (Worth noting: The two of them seem to be competitive in
practice but very friendly with each other as well.) I hasten to point out
that after Dallas’ win at the Clippers, I went on the FS Southwest postgame
show and praised Haywood for hustling through the game, once by flopping to
the floor for a loose ball.
(就像我所說的一樣，
目前小牛隊的問題多到可以用射飛鏢來決定要解決哪個問題，
對於黑霧的無用...
可能是因為他在競爭先發位置上
被拳王給解決了...
我曾在對快艇的勝利之後
讚美黑霧在球場上的拼勁~~~)
That’s the kind of “flop’’ Dallas needs out of Brendan Haywood, the
one-game good flop … not the four-game bad one.
(那樣的演出是達拉斯需要黑霧所做的
在場上一次又一次的展現拼勁
而不是這四場比賽的表現...)
http://0rz.tw/VPE2e
黑霧加油!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.127.140.2
推
11/10 00:11, , 1F
11/10 00:11, 1F
推
11/10 00:15, , 2F
11/10 00:15, 2F
→
11/10 00:16, , 3F
11/10 00:16, 3F
喔喔謝謝!!!!
※ 編輯: LKN555 來自: 59.127.140.2 (11/10 00:20)
→
11/10 00:22, , 4F
11/10 00:22, 4F
推
11/10 00:30, , 5F
11/10 00:30, 5F
→
11/10 00:32, , 6F
11/10 00:32, 6F
→
11/10 00:32, , 7F
11/10 00:32, 7F
→
11/10 00:33, , 8F
11/10 00:33, 8F
→
11/10 00:33, , 9F
11/10 00:33, 9F
→
11/10 00:34, , 10F
11/10 00:34, 10F
→
11/10 00:34, , 11F
11/10 00:34, 11F
→
11/10 00:35, , 12F
11/10 00:35, 12F
推
11/10 00:43, , 13F
11/10 00:43, 13F
→
11/10 00:44, , 14F
11/10 00:44, 14F
感謝大家!!!!
推
11/10 00:58, , 15F
11/10 00:58, 15F
推
11/10 01:00, , 16F
11/10 01:00, 16F
→
11/10 01:01, , 17F
11/10 01:01, 17F
推
11/10 01:15, , 18F
11/10 01:15, 18F
→
11/10 01:22, , 19F
11/10 01:22, 19F
→
11/10 01:22, , 20F
11/10 01:22, 20F
→
11/10 01:24, , 21F
11/10 01:24, 21F
推
11/10 01:25, , 22F
11/10 01:25, 22F
推
11/10 01:27, , 23F
11/10 01:27, 23F
推
11/10 01:28, , 24F
11/10 01:28, 24F
→
11/10 01:28, , 25F
11/10 01:28, 25F
→
11/10 01:29, , 26F
11/10 01:29, 26F
推
11/10 01:31, , 27F
11/10 01:31, 27F
推
11/10 01:32, , 28F
11/10 01:32, 28F
→
11/10 01:32, , 29F
11/10 01:32, 29F
→
11/10 01:33, , 30F
11/10 01:33, 30F
→
11/10 01:34, , 31F
11/10 01:34, 31F
推
11/10 01:34, , 32F
11/10 01:34, 32F
→
11/10 01:35, , 33F
11/10 01:35, 33F
→
11/10 01:35, , 34F
11/10 01:35, 34F
→
11/10 01:36, , 35F
11/10 01:36, 35F
→
11/10 01:36, , 36F
11/10 01:36, 36F
→
11/10 01:36, , 37F
11/10 01:36, 37F
推
11/10 01:36, , 38F
11/10 01:36, 38F
→
11/10 01:37, , 39F
11/10 01:37, 39F
→
11/10 01:39, , 40F
11/10 01:39, 40F
推
11/10 01:39, , 41F
11/10 01:39, 41F
→
11/10 01:40, , 42F
11/10 01:40, 42F
→
11/10 01:41, , 43F
11/10 01:41, 43F
→
11/10 01:41, , 44F
11/10 01:41, 44F
→
11/10 01:41, , 45F
11/10 01:41, 45F
→
11/10 01:42, , 46F
11/10 01:42, 46F
→
11/10 01:42, , 47F
11/10 01:42, 47F
→
11/10 01:42, , 48F
11/10 01:42, 48F
推
11/10 01:42, , 49F
11/10 01:42, 49F
推
11/10 01:43, , 50F
11/10 01:43, 50F
推
11/10 01:43, , 51F
11/10 01:43, 51F
→
11/10 01:44, , 52F
11/10 01:44, 52F
→
11/10 01:44, , 53F
11/10 01:44, 53F
→
11/10 01:44, , 54F
11/10 01:44, 54F
→
11/10 01:45, , 55F
11/10 01:45, 55F
→
11/10 01:46, , 56F
11/10 01:46, 56F
→
11/10 01:46, , 57F
11/10 01:46, 57F
→
11/10 01:46, , 58F
11/10 01:46, 58F
推
11/10 01:47, , 59F
11/10 01:47, 59F
→
11/10 01:47, , 60F
11/10 01:47, 60F
→
11/10 01:48, , 61F
11/10 01:48, 61F
推
11/10 01:49, , 62F
11/10 01:49, 62F
推
11/10 01:57, , 63F
11/10 01:57, 63F
推
11/10 01:59, , 64F
11/10 01:59, 64F
推
11/10 02:01, , 65F
11/10 02:01, 65F
※ 編輯: LKN555 來自: 59.127.140.2 (11/10 07:50)
討論串 (同標題文章)