Re: [問題] 請問1+1=2是如何證出來的

看板Math作者 (+oo)時間21年前 (2003/01/11 17:25), 編輯推噓239(239015)
留言254則, 235人參與, 4年前最新討論串1/1
※ 引述《bigjuto (用過的都說棒)》之銘言: : 是用皮亞諾公設嗎... : 該如何去證? Author: Pinter We will proceed as follows: we define 0 = {}. In order to define "1," we must fix a set with exactly one element; thus 1 = {0}. Continuing in fashion, we define 2 = {0,1}, 3 = {0,1,2}, 4 = {0,1,2,3}, etc. The reader should note that 0 = {}, 1 = {{}}, 2 = {{},{{}}}, etc. Our natural numbers are constructions beginning with the empty set. The preceding definitions can be restarted, a little more precisely, as follows. If A is a set, we define the successor of A to be the set A^+, given by A^+ = A ∪ {A}. Thus, A^+ is obtained by adjoining to A exactly one new element, namely the element A. Now we define 0 = {}, 1 = 0^+, 2 = 1^+, 3 = 2^+, etc. 現在問題來了, 有一個 set 是包括所有 natural numbers 的嗎 ? (甚至問 一個 class). 這邊先定義一個名詞, 接著在引 A9, 我們就可以造出一個 set 包括所有的 natural numbers. A set A is called a successor set if it has the following properties: i) {} [- A. ii) If X [- A, then X^+ [- A. It is clear that any successor set necessarily includes all the natural numbers. Motivated bt this observation, we introduce the following important axiom. A9 (Axiom of Infinity). There exist a successor set. As we have noted, every successor set includes all the natural numbers; thus it would make sense to define the "set of the natural numbera" to be the smallest successor set. Now it is easy to verify that any intersection of successor sets is a successor set; in particular, the intersection of all the successor sets is a successor set (it is obviously the smallest successor set). Thus, we are led naturally to the following definition. 6.1 Definition By the set of the natural numbers we mean the intersection of all the successor sets. The set of the natural numbers is designated by the symbol ω; every element of ω is called a natural number. 6.2 Theorem For each n [- ω, n^+≠0. Proof. By definition, n^+ = n ∪ {n}; thus n [- n^+ for each natural number n; but 0 is the empty set, hence 0 cannot be n^+ for any n. 6.3 Theorem (Mathematical Induction). Let X be a subset of ω; suppose X has the following properties: i) 0 [- X. ii) If n [- X, then n^+ [- X. Then X = ω. Proof. Conditions (i) and (ii) imply that X is a successor set. By 6.1 ω is a subset of every successor set; thus ω 包含於 X. But X 包含於 ω; so X = ω. 6.4 Lemma Let m and natural numbers; if m [- n^+, then m [- n or m = n. Proof. By definition, n^+ = n ∪ {n}; thus, if m [- n^+, then m [- n or m [- {n}; but {n} is a singleton, so m [- {n} iff m = n. 6.5 Definition A set A is called transitive if, for such x [- A, x 包含於 A. 6.6 Lemma Every natural number is a transitive set. Proof. Let X be the set of all the elements of ω which are transitive sets; we will prove, using mathematical induction (Theorem 6.3), that X = ω; it will follow that every natural number is a transitive set. i) 0 [- X, for if 0 were not a transitive set, this would mean that 存在 y [- 0 such that y is not a subset of 0; but this is absurd, since 0 = {}. ii) Now suppose that n [- X; we will show that n^+ is a transitive set; that is, assuming that n is a transitive set, we will show that n^+ is a transitive set. Let m [- n^+; by 6.4 m [- n or m = n. If m [- n, then (because n is transitive) m 包含於 n; but n 包含於 n^+, so m 包含於 n^+. If n = m, then (because n 包含於 n^+) m 包含於 n^+; thus in either case, m 包含於 n^+, so n^+ [- X. It folloes by 6.3 that X = ω. 6.7 Theorem Let n and m be natural numbers. If n^+ = m^+, then n = m. Proof. Suppose n^+ = m^+; now n [- n^+, hence n [- m^+; thus by 6.4 n [- m or n = m. By the very same argument, m [- n or m = n. If n = m, the theorem is proved. Now suppose n≠m; then n [- m and m [- n. Thus by 6.5 and 6.6, n 包含於 m and m 包含於 n, hence n = m. 6.8 Recursion Theorem Let A be a set, c a fixed element of A, and f a function from A to A. Then there exists a unique function γ: ω -> A such that I. γ(0) = c, and II. γ(n^+) = f(γ(n)), 對任意的 n [- ω. Proof. First, we will establish the existence of γ. It should be carefully noted that γ is a set of ordered pairs which is a function and satisfies Conditions I and II. More specifically, γ is a subset of ω╳A with the following four properties: 1) 對任意的 n [- ω, 存在 x [- A s.t. (n,x) [- γ. 2) If (n,x_1) [- γ and (n,x_2) [- γ, then x_1 = x_2. 3) (0,c) [- γ. 4) If (n,x) [- γ, then (n^+,f(x)) [- γ. Properties (1) and (2) express the fact that γ is a function from ω to A, while properties (3) and (4) are clearly equivalent to I and II. We will now construct a graph γ with these four properties. Let Λ = { G | G 包含於 ω╳A and G satisfies (3) and (4) }; Λ is nonempty, because ω╳A [- Λ. It is easy to see that any intersection of elements of Λ is an element of Λ; in particular, γ = ∩ G G[-Λ is an element of Λ. We proceed to show that γ is the function we require. By construction, γ satisfies (3) and (4), so it remains only to show that (1) and (2) hold. 1) It will be shown by induction that domγ = ω, which clearly implies (1). By (3), (0,c) [- γ; now suppose n [- domγ. Then 存在 x [- A 使得 (n,x) [-γ; by (4), then, (n^+,f(x)) [- γ, so n^+ [- domγ. Thus, by Theorem 6.3 domγ = ω. 2) Let N = { n [- ω | (n,x) [- γ for no more than one x [- A }. It will be shown by induction that N = ω. To prove that 0 [- N, we first assume the contrary; that is, we assume that (0,c) [- γ and (0,d) [- γ where c≠d. Let γ^* = γ - {(0,d)}; certainly γ^* satisfies (3); to show that γ^* satisfies (4), suppose that (n,x) [- γ^*. Then (n,x) [- γ, so (n^+,f(x)) [- γ; but n^+≠0 (Theorem 6.2), so (n^+,f(x))≠(0,d), and consequently (n^+,f(x)) [- γ^*. We conclude that γ^* satisfies (4), so γ^* [- Λ; but γ is the intersection of all elements of Λ, so γ 包含於 γ^*. This is impossible, hence 0 [- N. Next, we assume that n [- N and prove that n^+ [- N. To do so, we first assume the contrary -- that is, we suppose that (n,x) [- γ, (n^+,f(x)) [- γ, and (n^+,u) [- γ where u≠f(x). Let γ^。 = γ - {(n^+,u)}; γ^。 satisfies (3) because (n^+,u)≠(0,c) (indeed, n^+≠0 by Theorem 6.2). To show that γ^。 satisfies (4), suppose (m,v) [- γ^。; then (m,v) [- γ, so (m^+,f(v)) [- γ. Now we consider two cases, according as (a) m^+≠n^+ or (b) m^+ = n^+. a) m^+≠n^+. Then (m^+,f(v))≠(n^+,u), so (m^+,f(v)) [- γ^。. b) m^+ = n^+. Then m = n by 6.7, so (m,v) = (n,v); but n [- N, so (n,x) [- γ for no more than one x [- A; it follows that v = x, and so (m^+,f(v)) = (n^+,f(x)) [- γ^。. Thus, in either case (a) or (b), (m^+,f(v)) [- γ^。, thus, γ^。 satisfies Condition (4), so γ^。[- Λ. But γ is the intersection of all the elements of Λ, so γ 包含於 γ^。; this is impossible, so we conclude that n^+ [- N. Thus N = ω. Finally, we will prove that γ is unique. Let γ and γ' be functions, from ω to A which satisfy I and II. We will prove by induction that γ = γ'. Let M = { n [- ω | γ(n) = γ'(n) }. Now γ(0) = c = γ'(0), so 0 [- M; next, suppose that n [- M. Then γ(n^+) = f(γ(n)) = f(γ'(n)) = γ'(n^+), hence n^+ [- M. If m is a natural number, the recurion theorem guarantees the existence of a unique function γ_m: ω -> ω defined by the two Conditions I. γ_m(0)=m, II. γ_m(n^+) = [γ_m(n)]^+, 對任意的 n [- ω. Addition of natural numbers is now defined as follows: m + n = γ_m(n) for all m, n [- ω. 6.10 m + 0 = m, m + n^+ = (m + n)^+. 6.11 Lemma n^+ = 1 + n, where 1 is defined to be 0^+ Proof. This can be proven by induction on n. If n = 0, then we have 0^+ = 1 = 1 + 0 (this last equality follows from 6.10), hence the lemma holds for n = 0. Now, assuming the lemma is true for n, let us show that it holds for n^+: 1 + n^+ = (1 + n)^+ by 6.10 = (n^+)^+ by the hypothesis of induction. 把 n = 1 並且注意 2 = 1^+, 故 1 + 1 = 2. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 140.112.247.33

218.166.83.69 06/28, , 1F
哇靠好屌
218.166.83.69 06/28, 1F

61.229.69.217 08/28, , 2F
3銀
61.229.69.217 08/28, 2F

01/10 17:57, , 3F
緊握小根根
01/10 17:57, 3F

01/10 17:58, , 4F
緊握小根根
01/10 17:58, 4F

01/10 18:00, , 5F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:00, 5F

01/10 18:05, , 6F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:05, 6F

01/10 18:13, , 7F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:13, 7F

01/10 18:23, , 8F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:23, 8F

01/10 18:25, , 9F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:25, 9F

01/10 18:26, , 10F
緊握小根根
01/10 18:26, 10F

04/24 18:08, , 11F
￿￿￿￿￿
04/24 18:08, 11F

05/16 00:29, , 12F
2000gandam@yahoo.com.tw
05/16 00:29, 12F

03/30 18:46, , 13F
朝聖
03/30 18:46, 13F

07/18 07:41, , 14F
借轉
07/18 07:41, 14F

09/07 00:05, , 15F
test
09/07 00:05, 15F

09/11 02:07, , 16F
八卦板來朝聖 看到第四頁以後就笑了...
09/11 02:07, 16F

09/11 09:13, , 17F
XD
09/11 09:13, 17F

11/21 18:01, , 18F
ㄎㄎ
11/21 18:01, 18F

09/08 16:39, , 19F
O_O
09/08 16:39, 19F

09/19 14:23, , 20F
90902Bbbsai
09/19 14:23, 20F

11/05 03:13, , 21F
來朝聖
11/05 03:13, 21F

11/05 03:19, , 22F
朝聖
11/05 03:19, 22F

11/05 08:08, , 23F
朝聖 跨謀
11/05 08:08, 23F

11/05 10:25, , 24F
洗咧攻殺毀
11/05 10:25, 24F

11/21 19:39, , 25F
朝聖
11/21 19:39, 25F

11/21 19:40, , 26F
跨隆謀
11/21 19:40, 26F

11/21 19:44, , 27F
來朝聖 原來1+1=2是這麼複雜的式子
11/21 19:44, 27F

11/21 19:56, , 28F
朝聖
11/21 19:56, 28F

11/21 20:01, , 29F
朝聖 請問甚麼是一 甚麼是二? 有必要那麼複雜嗎
11/21 20:01, 29F

11/21 20:12, , 30F
朝聖
11/21 20:12, 30F

11/21 21:28, , 31F
這不會有循環證法問題嗎???
11/21 21:28, 31F

01/10 17:45, , 32F
.......
01/10 17:45, 32F

04/07 23:40, , 33F
-]這個屬於符號看得好累
04/07 23:40, 33F

04/07 23:41, , 34F
要是x-]X可以改成x in X,會容易得多吧!
04/07 23:41, 34F

05/10 21:12, , 35F
2010/05/10
05/10 21:12, 35F

05/12 15:12, , 36F
2010 / 05 / 12
05/12 15:12, 36F

05/27 13:11, , 37F
2010/05/27
05/27 13:11, 37F

07/08 15:14, , 38F
2010.7/8
07/08 15:14, 38F

07/08 15:18, , 39F
朝聖
07/08 15:18, 39F
還有 175 則推文
07/15 22:30, , 215F
2016/07/15 我到底看了三小
07/15 22:30, 215F

08/05 16:33, , 216F
2016/08/05
08/05 16:33, 216F

08/30 23:00, , 217F
2016/8/30
08/30 23:00, 217F

09/29 06:02, , 218F
2016/9/29
09/29 06:02, 218F

12/13 14:08, , 219F
來朝聖 2016/12/13
12/13 14:08, 219F

01/09 09:40, , 220F
恩恩 跟我想的一樣 2017/
01/09 09:40, 220F

01/10 01:32, , 221F
太深奧了
01/10 01:32, 221F

03/07 11:19, , 222F
大獅必推!
03/07 11:19, 222F

04/25 21:35, , 223F
朝聖 2017/4/25
04/25 21:35, 223F

05/09 12:03, , 224F
朝聖 2017/05/09 XD
05/09 12:03, 224F

09/01 12:55, , 225F
2017/09/01 朝聖 plover大大生日快樂!
09/01 12:55, 225F

09/13 21:27, , 226F
朝聖 2017/09/12
09/13 21:27, 226F

10/23 10:10, , 227F
朝聖 2017/10/23
10/23 10:10, 227F

11/12 15:19, , 228F
2017/11/12 朝聖
11/12 15:19, 228F

01/10 12:09, , 229F
2018 1 10 推
01/10 12:09, 229F

01/14 22:41, , 230F
朝聖推
01/14 22:41, 230F

01/14 22:42, , 231F
朝聖 2018/01/14
01/14 22:42, 231F

01/14 22:45, , 232F
朝聖 2018.01.14
01/14 22:45, 232F

01/14 22:46, , 233F
2018/01/14 朝聖
01/14 22:46, 233F

01/22 02:35, , 234F
2018/01/22 朝聖
01/22 02:35, 234F

01/22 14:58, , 235F
2018/1/22
01/22 14:58, 235F

02/03 20:29, , 236F
2018/02/03朝聖
02/03 20:29, 236F

03/12 09:44, , 237F
[-是指 "belong to"嗎 ∈
03/12 09:44, 237F

04/06 15:39, , 238F
20180406
04/06 15:39, 238F

06/03 00:19, , 239F
20180603朝聖
06/03 00:19, 239F

06/03 22:34, , 240F
2018/06/03朝聖
06/03 22:34, 240F

06/04 13:55, , 241F
20180604 朝聖
06/04 13:55, 241F

09/10 18:24, , 242F
2018/9/10 朝聖
09/10 18:24, 242F

09/25 01:33, , 243F
2018.9.25 朝聖
09/25 01:33, 243F

09/25 21:23, , 244F
107.09.25
09/25 21:23, 244F

09/25 21:25, , 245F
緊握小根根
09/25 21:25, 245F

10/15 15:00, , 246F
2018.10.15朝聖數學的起源
10/15 15:00, 246F

10/17 22:12, , 247F
高二生瑟瑟發抖
10/17 22:12, 247F

12/02 01:47, , 248F
2018.12.02
12/02 01:47, 248F

12/05 15:42, , 249F
2018.12.5
12/05 15:42, 249F

12/05 15:53, , 250F
2018/12/5 朝聖
12/05 15:53, 250F

12/08 19:26, , 251F
...朝聖
12/08 19:26, 251F

01/03 14:35, 5年前 , 252F
2019.1.3 朝聖
01/03 14:35, 252F

03/17 00:04, 5年前 , 253F
朝聖……
03/17 00:04, 253F

09/25 12:22, 4年前 , 254F
2019/9/25 考古朝聖
09/25 12:22, 254F
文章代碼(AID): #-7-C1CF (Math)