Fw: [新聞] 梁文傑評跆拳 阮昭雄批自以為是
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1G8w4vgO ]
作者: lostom (大茹) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [新聞] 梁文傑評跆拳 阮昭雄批自以為是
時間: Thu Aug 9 19:38:29 2012
政治中心/綜合報導
民進黨籍台北市議員梁文傑在臉書上評論跆拳道已完全運動化,遇上泰拳或拳擊手一定很
快被打趴,引發兩極看法;就連同黨市議員阮昭雄也在臉書上直轟自以為是。
台灣跆拳好手楊淑君、魏辰洋雙雙落敗,引發惋惜,不過,但梁文傑表示,自己看過幾場
跆拳道比賽後,「發現這種完全運動化的武術在實戰中毫無用處,遇到泰拳或拳擊手會很
快被打趴,一點都不值得學」。引發網友抨擊「他們用腳踢跆拳,你用嘴踢!」。
梁文傑在部落格上撰文「跆拳道是武術還是運動?」指出,今日的跆拳道已經是完全運動
化的武術,甚至未必可稱得上是武術。一旦與講究拳拳到肉、必須造成實質性傷害的泰拳
或拳擊較量,其運動而非武術的本質就會暴露出來。「如果你想學武防身,跆拳道不是好
的選擇。但如果你只想做運動,甚至想拿奧運金牌,學跆拳道未嘗不可」。
對於梁文傑的評論,阮昭雄也在臉書發文說,武術的學習在於經過技術的不斷精進,同時
要求武德品格也隨著提昇,這是習武的要義,而將武術運動化競技化是為了便於推廣、便
於讓非學習者了解;但用什麼武術打不過什麼武術,這對習武者是一大侮辱,也是對心性
學習精進者的不敬。
阮昭雄直批,政治人物的自以為是,讓我深感警惕;「我的同事文傑兄,身為你的同黨同
志(事), 對於你的發言是你的言論自由,但內容我卻深深不以為然!!!」
http://tinyurl.com/c6bsno9
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.114.87.75
→
08/09 19:39, , 1F
08/09 19:39, 1F
噓
08/09 19:39, , 2F
08/09 19:39, 2F
噓
08/09 19:39, , 3F
08/09 19:39, 3F
推
08/09 19:39, , 4F
08/09 19:39, 4F
→
08/09 19:39, , 5F
08/09 19:39, 5F
推
08/09 19:39, , 6F
08/09 19:39, 6F
推
08/09 19:40, , 7F
08/09 19:40, 7F
推
08/09 19:40, , 8F
08/09 19:40, 8F
→
08/09 19:40, , 9F
08/09 19:40, 9F
→
08/09 19:40, , 10F
08/09 19:40, 10F
→
08/09 19:40, , 11F
08/09 19:40, 11F
噓
08/09 19:40, , 12F
08/09 19:40, 12F
推
08/09 19:41, , 13F
08/09 19:41, 13F
噓
08/09 19:41, , 14F
08/09 19:41, 14F
→
08/09 19:41, , 15F
08/09 19:41, 15F
噓
08/09 19:41, , 16F
08/09 19:41, 16F
→
08/09 19:41, , 17F
08/09 19:41, 17F
→
08/09 19:41, , 18F
08/09 19:41, 18F
推
08/09 19:41, , 19F
08/09 19:41, 19F
噓
08/09 19:41, , 20F
08/09 19:41, 20F
→
08/09 19:41, , 21F
08/09 19:41, 21F
→
08/09 19:41, , 22F
08/09 19:41, 22F
推
08/09 19:42, , 23F
08/09 19:42, 23F
→
08/09 19:42, , 24F
08/09 19:42, 24F
→
08/09 19:42, , 25F
08/09 19:42, 25F
→
08/09 19:42, , 26F
08/09 19:42, 26F
推
08/09 19:42, , 27F
08/09 19:42, 27F
→
08/09 19:42, , 28F
08/09 19:42, 28F
噓
08/09 19:42, , 29F
08/09 19:42, 29F
→
08/09 19:43, , 30F
08/09 19:43, 30F
→
08/09 19:44, , 31F
08/09 19:44, 31F
→
08/09 19:44, , 32F
08/09 19:44, 32F
推
08/09 19:44, , 33F
08/09 19:44, 33F
→
08/09 19:44, , 34F
08/09 19:44, 34F
噓
08/09 19:44, , 35F
08/09 19:44, 35F
推
08/09 19:45, , 36F
08/09 19:45, 36F
→
08/09 19:45, , 37F
08/09 19:45, 37F
→
08/09 19:45, , 38F
08/09 19:45, 38F
噓
08/09 19:46, , 39F
08/09 19:46, 39F
還有 30 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
08/09 21:37, , 70F
08/09 21:37, 70F
→
08/09 21:38, , 71F
08/09 21:38, 71F
推
08/09 21:39, , 72F
08/09 21:39, 72F
→
08/09 21:40, , 73F
08/09 21:40, 73F
→
08/09 22:25, , 74F
08/09 22:25, 74F
→
08/09 22:25, , 75F
08/09 22:25, 75F
→
08/09 22:25, , 76F
08/09 22:25, 76F
推
08/09 22:48, , 77F
08/09 22:48, 77F
→
08/09 22:48, , 78F
08/09 22:48, 78F
→
08/09 22:49, , 79F
08/09 22:49, 79F
→
08/09 22:50, , 80F
08/09 22:50, 80F
→
08/09 22:51, , 81F
08/09 22:51, 81F
→
08/09 22:51, , 82F
08/09 22:51, 82F
→
08/09 22:52, , 83F
08/09 22:52, 83F
→
08/09 22:52, , 84F
08/09 22:52, 84F
→
08/09 22:53, , 85F
08/09 22:53, 85F
→
08/09 22:54, , 86F
08/09 22:54, 86F
推
08/09 22:54, , 87F
08/09 22:54, 87F
→
08/09 22:54, , 88F
08/09 22:54, 88F
→
08/09 22:54, , 89F
08/09 22:54, 89F
→
08/09 22:55, , 90F
08/09 22:55, 90F
→
08/09 22:56, , 91F
08/09 22:56, 91F
→
08/09 22:56, , 92F
08/09 22:56, 92F
推
08/10 00:24, , 93F
08/10 00:24, 93F
→
08/10 00:25, , 94F
08/10 00:25, 94F
推
08/10 00:31, , 95F
08/10 00:31, 95F
推
08/10 00:36, , 96F
08/10 00:36, 96F
→
08/10 08:31, , 97F
08/10 08:31, 97F
→
08/10 08:31, , 98F
08/10 08:31, 98F
推
08/10 09:39, , 99F
08/10 09:39, 99F
→
08/10 10:29, , 100F
08/10 10:29, 100F
推
08/10 15:56, , 101F
08/10 15:56, 101F
推
08/10 17:56, , 102F
08/10 17:56, 102F
→
08/10 17:57, , 103F
08/10 17:57, 103F
推
08/10 20:07, , 104F
08/10 20:07, 104F
推
08/11 11:49, , 105F
08/11 11:49, 105F
→
08/11 11:50, , 106F
08/11 11:50, 106F
推
08/28 02:07, , 107F
08/28 02:07, 107F
→
08/28 02:09, , 108F
08/28 02:09, 108F
→
08/28 02:11, , 109F
08/28 02:11, 109F