Re: [閒聊] Vshojo是不是要炸箱ㄌ已回收
看成員推特截圖沒有內鬥 槍口一致對Nux
看起來兩邊都有失誤的地方
一邊VShojo發公告澄清 一邊Nux刪影片道歉
除非Nux又有料要爆
公告了道歉了 私下解決
應該就句點在這了吧
怎麼跟烏頭那次有點像 不過網址裡有一堆截圖可以慢慢品嘗
懶人包翻譯+-看 想看更多進去慢慢看
https://medium.com/@gunrun/addressing-security-accusations-2ce5e0b554cd
"VShojo stayed silent, while indies suffered"
"VShojo默不作聲，個人勢受苦"
Allegation — People were still in danger of phishing attacks from VShojo.org
指控--人們仍然面臨來自 VShojo.org 的網絡釣魚攻擊的危險
Reality: Our cybersecurity team was able to work with law enforcement to
obtain the target list from the threat actor. This list confirmed that only
two phishing attempts were made. One to Nux and the other to Sakii.
現實: 我們的網絡安全團隊與法務部門合作，從威脅行為者那裡獲取目標列表。
此列表確認僅進行了兩次網絡釣魚嘗試。 一個是Nux，另一個是Sakii。
"VShojo Approved Nux’s Video"
"VShojo 承認了 Nux的影片"
Allegation — VShojo gave Nux approval to release his video
指控——VShojo 批准 Nux 發布他的影片
Reality: VShojo never at any point said that he had permission, nor were we
asked
現實: VShojo從來沒有說過他有許可，我們也沒有被問到。
VShojo was given limited time to suggest edits and create a statement
VShojo 被給予有限時間給予編輯建議和創建聲明
Politeness in Twitter reply text was misconstrued as approval/endorsement
推特上禮貌性的回文被誤解為批准/認可
Notes are written in a polite manner, but are critical of information Nux
covered in the video.
註釋以禮貌的方式書寫, 但對關於Nux的訊息進行批評
Suggestions for edits were ignored (beyond blurring of some names)
編輯建議被忽略 (除了馬賽克一些名字)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.181.180.8 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Marginalman/M.1638088638.A.F78.html
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇)：
