[心得] 為什麼范加爾一直沿用Rooney
在這之前我一直以為范加爾是因為隊長壓力所以沒有扯下Rooney,
但今天突然發現了繼續用Rooney竟然是因為兩個字 – 防守
范加爾的哲學很簡單,控球,寧願贏得難看也不要輸得莫名其妙
如果現在給范加爾2010年的Makélele, Jason Terry
幾乎可以肯定他的表現會和鳥叔差不多
Rooney 與 Martial 當中鋒最大的差別就是防守
Rooney是從守門員、後衛到對方的前鋒,都可以防守
但 Martial 目前還不能證明他可以防守全場
防守與進攻才華 明顯范加爾選擇了前者
今天看了很多報道 看到很多都寫著
范加爾在賽後記者會都覺得曼聯踢得不錯
在休息室恭喜球員表現不錯
每個教練都有自己的哲學
也許我們已經習慣Fergie在平手時最後10分鐘還會想辦法搶分
或許我們已經習慣Fergie那種你可以進6球為什麼開始放鬆的態度
可能我們現在只能無奈接受范加爾的哲學
但昨天看到比賽結束范加爾走下來有球迷想和他握手
我突然想說我那時如果在那邊
我想和他說 Your football is so boring
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.78.60.59
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ManUtd/M.1445874068.A.99B.html
推
10/27 00:31, , 1F
10/27 00:31, 1F
→
10/27 00:39, , 2F
10/27 00:39, 2F
推
10/27 00:42, , 3F
10/27 00:42, 3F
推
10/27 00:43, , 4F
10/27 00:43, 4F
→
10/27 00:50, , 5F
10/27 00:50, 5F
推
10/27 00:55, , 6F
10/27 00:55, 6F
→
10/27 00:59, , 7F
10/27 00:59, 7F
推
10/27 01:03, , 8F
10/27 01:03, 8F
→
10/27 01:03, , 9F
10/27 01:03, 9F
推
10/27 01:32, , 10F
10/27 01:32, 10F
推
10/27 02:11, , 11F
10/27 02:11, 11F
→
10/27 02:12, , 12F
10/27 02:12, 12F
→
10/27 02:19, , 13F
10/27 02:19, 13F
→
10/27 02:20, , 14F
10/27 02:20, 14F
→
10/27 02:21, , 15F
10/27 02:21, 15F
→
10/27 02:22, , 16F
10/27 02:22, 16F
→
10/27 02:23, , 17F
10/27 02:23, 17F
→
10/27 02:23, , 18F
10/27 02:23, 18F
→
10/27 02:24, , 19F
10/27 02:24, 19F
→
10/27 02:25, , 20F
10/27 02:25, 20F
→
10/27 02:25, , 21F
10/27 02:25, 21F
→
10/27 02:26, , 22F
10/27 02:26, 22F
→
10/27 02:26, , 23F
10/27 02:26, 23F
→
10/27 02:27, , 24F
10/27 02:27, 24F
推
10/27 02:29, , 25F
10/27 02:29, 25F
→
10/27 02:30, , 26F
10/27 02:30, 26F
→
10/27 02:30, , 27F
10/27 02:30, 27F
→
10/27 02:31, , 28F
10/27 02:31, 28F
→
10/27 02:31, , 29F
10/27 02:31, 29F
→
10/27 02:32, , 30F
10/27 02:32, 30F
→
10/27 02:32, , 31F
10/27 02:32, 31F
→
10/27 02:32, , 32F
10/27 02:32, 32F
→
10/27 02:32, , 33F
10/27 02:32, 33F
推
10/27 02:33, , 34F
10/27 02:33, 34F
→
10/27 02:33, , 35F
10/27 02:33, 35F
→
10/27 02:34, , 36F
10/27 02:34, 36F
→
10/27 02:34, , 37F
10/27 02:34, 37F
→
10/27 02:38, , 38F
10/27 02:38, 38F
→
10/27 02:39, , 39F
10/27 02:39, 39F
→
10/27 02:41, , 40F
10/27 02:41, 40F
推
10/27 02:41, , 41F
10/27 02:41, 41F
→
10/27 02:42, , 42F
10/27 02:42, 42F
→
10/27 02:42, , 43F
10/27 02:42, 43F
→
10/27 02:43, , 44F
10/27 02:43, 44F
→
10/27 02:43, , 45F
10/27 02:43, 45F
推
10/27 02:43, , 46F
10/27 02:43, 46F
→
10/27 02:44, , 47F
10/27 02:44, 47F
→
10/27 02:44, , 48F
10/27 02:44, 48F
→
10/27 02:45, , 49F
10/27 02:45, 49F
→
10/27 02:46, , 50F
10/27 02:46, 50F
→
10/27 02:47, , 51F
10/27 02:47, 51F
推
10/27 02:48, , 52F
10/27 02:48, 52F
→
10/27 02:50, , 53F
10/27 02:50, 53F
推
10/27 02:50, , 54F
10/27 02:50, 54F
→
10/27 02:50, , 55F
10/27 02:50, 55F
→
10/27 02:50, , 56F
10/27 02:50, 56F
推
10/27 02:51, , 57F
10/27 02:51, 57F
→
10/27 02:52, , 58F
10/27 02:52, 58F
→
10/27 02:53, , 59F
10/27 02:53, 59F
→
10/27 02:54, , 60F
10/27 02:54, 60F
→
10/27 02:55, , 61F
10/27 02:55, 61F
推
10/27 02:56, , 62F
10/27 02:56, 62F
→
10/27 02:56, , 63F
10/27 02:56, 63F
→
10/27 02:56, , 64F
10/27 02:56, 64F
推
10/27 03:10, , 65F
10/27 03:10, 65F
→
10/27 03:10, , 66F
10/27 03:10, 66F
→
10/27 03:12, , 67F
10/27 03:12, 67F
噓
10/27 04:51, , 68F
10/27 04:51, 68F
噓
10/27 07:38, , 69F
10/27 07:38, 69F
推
10/27 09:30, , 70F
10/27 09:30, 70F
推
10/27 13:24, , 71F
10/27 13:24, 71F
推
10/27 14:53, , 72F
10/27 14:53, 72F
→
10/27 14:53, , 73F
10/27 14:53, 73F
→
10/27 14:56, , 74F
10/27 14:56, 74F
→
10/27 14:56, , 75F
10/27 14:56, 75F
推
10/27 15:01, , 76F
10/27 15:01, 76F
推
10/27 15:04, , 77F
10/27 15:04, 77F
推
10/27 15:06, , 78F
10/27 15:06, 78F
推
10/27 17:02, , 79F
10/27 17:02, 79F
→
10/27 17:03, , 80F
10/27 17:03, 80F
推
10/27 18:25, , 81F
10/27 18:25, 81F
噓
10/28 14:13, , 82F
10/28 14:13, 82F
推
10/28 16:59, , 83F
10/28 16:59, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):