[閒聊] 對於很顯色的潤唇膏看法?
事情是這樣的
好姐妹妹生日了要幫她挑禮物
輾轉得知她想要潤唇膏
跟朋友就想說送好一點的去專櫃幫她挑
試了幾款,覺得小香的擦起來不均勻
我個人是比較愛BB的修護唇膏,覺得光澤感不錯
朋友喜歡植村秀的炫色精萃潤唇膏,覺得很顯色!
但我想說潤唇膏不就是自然不太顯色的嗎?
這麼顯色感覺是很保濕的唇膏?不知道我們那位生日姐妹合不合意~
但朋友認為顯色的潤唇膏很特別~感覺擦起來有唇膏質感
很像賺到(?
是真的很顯色,下面是我們的試擦照,真的只塗一層而已!
http://imgur.com/XSqkgq4.jpg
以潤唇膏來說是否有點over ?!
而且這還是保守一點的橘紅色
他其他還有大紅色、深紅色、桃紅色 顏色更over
想問問大家如果收到潤唇膏的話
會覺得很顯色好嗎?
現在好猶豫要挑保守型還是顯色型啊~>_<
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 58.114.77.115
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MakeUp/M.1472657218.A.E43.html
推
08/31 23:30, , 1F
08/31 23:30, 1F
→
08/31 23:30, , 2F
08/31 23:30, 2F
推
08/31 23:31, , 3F
08/31 23:31, 3F
→
08/31 23:31, , 4F
08/31 23:31, 4F
推
08/31 23:34, , 5F
08/31 23:34, 5F
→
08/31 23:35, , 6F
08/31 23:35, 6F
似乎大家對潤唇膏的印象普遍如此!
推
08/31 23:35, , 7F
08/31 23:35, 7F
→
08/31 23:35, , 8F
08/31 23:35, 8F
其實她蠻敢擦的 所以我們有點猶豫~
推
08/31 23:38, , 9F
08/31 23:38, 9F
→
08/31 23:38, , 10F
08/31 23:38, 10F
推
08/31 23:39, , 11F
08/31 23:39, 11F
→
08/31 23:39, , 12F
08/31 23:39, 12F
哈哈真的 怎麼會這麼顯色啦~
推
08/31 23:41, , 13F
08/31 23:41, 13F
→
08/31 23:42, , 14F
08/31 23:42, 14F
推
08/31 23:43, , 15F
08/31 23:43, 15F
那你一定要試試植村秀這款!
→
08/31 23:43, , 16F
08/31 23:43, 16F
推
08/31 23:45, , 17F
08/31 23:45, 17F
→
08/31 23:45, , 18F
08/31 23:45, 18F
推
08/31 23:48, , 19F
08/31 23:48, 19F
推
08/31 23:49, , 20F
08/31 23:49, 20F
但覺得DIOR的蠻透的誒...老實說朋友嘴唇有點暗沉...
推
08/31 23:52, , 21F
08/31 23:52, 21F
她就是什麼色都擦..常常被我們說ㄏ一ㄠˊ吱吱XDDD
※ 編輯: dodoes (58.114.77.115), 09/01/2016 00:04:09
推
09/01 00:02, , 22F
09/01 00:02, 22F
→
09/01 00:02, , 23F
09/01 00:02, 23F
→
09/01 00:06, , 24F
09/01 00:06, 24F
推
09/01 00:07, , 25F
09/01 00:07, 25F
→
09/01 00:08, , 26F
09/01 00:08, 26F
推
09/01 00:19, , 27F
09/01 00:19, 27F
推
09/01 00:21, , 28F
09/01 00:21, 28F
推
09/01 00:30, , 29F
09/01 00:30, 29F
→
09/01 00:30, , 30F
09/01 00:30, 30F
→
09/01 00:30, , 31F
09/01 00:30, 31F
推
09/01 00:35, , 32F
09/01 00:35, 32F
推
09/01 00:42, , 33F
09/01 00:42, 33F
→
09/01 00:42, , 34F
09/01 00:42, 34F
→
09/01 00:42, , 35F
09/01 00:42, 35F
推
09/01 00:46, , 36F
09/01 00:46, 36F
→
09/01 00:46, , 37F
09/01 00:46, 37F
推
09/01 00:57, , 38F
09/01 00:57, 38F
→
09/01 00:57, , 39F
09/01 00:57, 39F
推
09/01 01:08, , 40F
09/01 01:08, 40F
推
09/01 01:08, , 41F
09/01 01:08, 41F
推
09/01 01:26, , 42F
09/01 01:26, 42F
推
09/01 08:24, , 43F
09/01 08:24, 43F
推
09/01 09:03, , 44F
09/01 09:03, 44F
→
09/01 09:04, , 45F
09/01 09:04, 45F
推
09/01 09:17, , 46F
09/01 09:17, 46F
→
09/01 09:17, , 47F
09/01 09:17, 47F
推
09/01 09:22, , 48F
09/01 09:22, 48F
推
09/01 09:56, , 49F
09/01 09:56, 49F
→
09/01 09:56, , 50F
09/01 09:56, 50F
推
09/01 10:32, , 51F
09/01 10:32, 51F
→
09/01 10:32, , 52F
09/01 10:32, 52F
→
09/01 10:32, , 53F
09/01 10:32, 53F
推
09/01 11:05, , 54F
09/01 11:05, 54F
→
09/01 11:06, , 55F
09/01 11:06, 55F
推
09/01 11:49, , 56F
09/01 11:49, 56F
推
09/01 11:52, , 57F
09/01 11:52, 57F
推
09/01 12:28, , 58F
09/01 12:28, 58F
→
09/01 12:28, , 59F
09/01 12:28, 59F
推
09/01 14:28, , 60F
09/01 14:28, 60F
推
09/01 14:39, , 61F
09/01 14:39, 61F
推
09/01 15:50, , 62F
09/01 15:50, 62F
→
09/01 15:50, , 63F
09/01 15:50, 63F
推
09/01 16:54, , 64F
09/01 16:54, 64F
推
09/01 17:37, , 65F
09/01 17:37, 65F
→
09/01 17:37, , 66F
09/01 17:37, 66F
推
09/01 19:07, , 67F
09/01 19:07, 67F
推
09/02 05:01, , 68F
09/02 05:01, 68F
→
09/02 05:01, , 69F
09/02 05:01, 69F
推
09/02 12:02, , 70F
09/02 12:02, 70F
推
09/02 19:25, , 71F
09/02 19:25, 71F
推
09/03 15:35, , 72F
09/03 15:35, 72F
→
09/03 17:37, , 73F
09/03 17:37, 73F
推
09/05 08:57, , 74F
09/05 08:57, 74F