[問題] 買粉底液的時候會一起購買粉餅嗎?
想請問大家
在購買底妝產品(例如粉底液)的同時,會同時購買一起做搭配的粉餅嗎?
因為假設要買粉底液,而口袋又沒這麼深的時候
那通常靠櫃的時候,可能就只帶粉底液而已
但同時櫃姐又會很邪惡的說「搭配同產品的粉餅效果會比較好喔」
聽到這句話你就覺得好像不一起帶粉餅,會遺憾終身的感覺
但因為之前有過買整組底妝+粉餅,結果搭配起來的效果卻不如想像中的好
往往都是單用粉底液很好用,加上粉餅原本的很好用就會變的「差強人意」
或是單用粉餅覺得不錯,可是一定得配上自家的底妝使用
如果跟別家的混用就整個大走針
走針之後你就更搞不清楚到底是粉底液在作怪還是粉餅在作怪
為此我家不知道囤了多少塊幾乎不動如山的粉餅
更不用說粉底液跟粉餅的消耗速度又不是等速前進
一定會有某一樣產品先用完,然後把它的夥伴拿去跟別人配對的情況
當然我知道各家產品在設計時一定就是設計成相容模式
但也不能免除1+1不=2,反而變成-1的狀況,讓人無法痛下決心購買整組阿
而且我實在不懂粉餅扣掉盒子之後,買起來竟然還比粉底液貴的理由在哪???
所以不知道大家在買底妝的同時都會一起購買粉餅嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.227.19.199
推
04/08 21:45, , 1F
04/08 21:45, 1F
推
04/08 21:46, , 2F
04/08 21:46, 2F
→
04/08 21:47, , 3F
04/08 21:47, 3F
推
04/08 21:51, , 4F
04/08 21:51, 4F
→
04/08 21:51, , 5F
04/08 21:51, 5F
→
04/08 21:56, , 6F
04/08 21:56, 6F
推
04/08 22:04, , 7F
04/08 22:04, 7F
推
04/08 22:04, , 8F
04/08 22:04, 8F
→
04/08 22:05, , 9F
04/08 22:05, 9F
→
04/08 22:05, , 10F
04/08 22:05, 10F
→
04/08 22:06, , 11F
04/08 22:06, 11F
→
04/08 22:06, , 12F
04/08 22:06, 12F
→
04/08 22:07, , 13F
04/08 22:07, 13F
推
04/08 22:07, , 14F
04/08 22:07, 14F
→
04/08 22:07, , 15F
04/08 22:07, 15F
→
04/08 22:07, , 16F
04/08 22:07, 16F
→
04/08 22:07, , 17F
04/08 22:07, 17F
推
04/08 22:15, , 18F
04/08 22:15, 18F
→
04/08 22:15, , 19F
04/08 22:15, 19F
推
04/08 22:17, , 20F
04/08 22:17, 20F
→
04/08 22:36, , 21F
04/08 22:36, 21F
推
04/08 22:41, , 22F
04/08 22:41, 22F
→
04/08 22:41, , 23F
04/08 22:41, 23F
→
04/08 23:08, , 24F
04/08 23:08, 24F
→
04/08 23:09, , 25F
04/08 23:09, 25F
→
04/08 23:12, , 26F
04/08 23:12, 26F
推
04/08 23:13, , 27F
04/08 23:13, 27F
推
04/08 23:26, , 28F
04/08 23:26, 28F
→
04/08 23:40, , 29F
04/08 23:40, 29F
→
04/08 23:40, , 30F
04/08 23:40, 30F
→
04/08 23:40, , 31F
04/08 23:40, 31F
推
04/08 23:41, , 32F
04/08 23:41, 32F
推
04/09 00:20, , 33F
04/09 00:20, 33F
→
04/09 00:21, , 34F
04/09 00:21, 34F
→
04/09 00:22, , 35F
04/09 00:22, 35F
→
04/09 00:22, , 36F
04/09 00:22, 36F
→
04/09 00:22, , 37F
04/09 00:22, 37F
→
04/09 00:22, , 38F
04/09 00:22, 38F
推
04/09 00:26, , 39F
04/09 00:26, 39F
推
04/09 00:52, , 40F
04/09 00:52, 40F
→
04/09 01:36, , 41F
04/09 01:36, 41F
→
04/09 01:57, , 42F
04/09 01:57, 42F
→
04/09 02:08, , 43F
04/09 02:08, 43F
推
04/09 09:02, , 44F
04/09 09:02, 44F
→
04/09 09:02, , 45F
04/09 09:02, 45F
推
04/09 09:56, , 46F
04/09 09:56, 46F
推
04/09 09:59, , 47F
04/09 09:59, 47F
→
04/09 10:00, , 48F
04/09 10:00, 48F
推
04/09 10:01, , 49F
04/09 10:01, 49F
推
04/09 10:47, , 50F
04/09 10:47, 50F
→
04/09 10:47, , 51F
04/09 10:47, 51F
→
04/09 10:47, , 52F
04/09 10:47, 52F
→
04/09 14:35, , 53F
04/09 14:35, 53F
→
04/09 22:01, , 54F
04/09 22:01, 54F
→
04/09 22:02, , 55F
04/09 22:02, 55F
推
04/11 03:18, , 56F
04/11 03:18, 56F
推
04/13 10:38, , 57F
04/13 10:38, 57F
推
04/15 05:32, , 58F
04/15 05:32, 58F
→
04/15 05:33, , 59F
04/15 05:33, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):