[討論] Rebound & Unearth

看板Magic作者KomachiO (～江戸っ子気質な死神～)時間9年前 (2015/03/05 11:14)推噓13(13推 0噓 29→)

留言42則, 7人參與討論串1/1

總之，自己的坑自己收。 http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=198301 上面是歷時施放，底下的規則部分有對Rebound的細部解說。只取跟這次在推文中起爭議的相關部分： "If a spell moves itself into another zone as part of its resolution (as Arc Blade, All Suns' Dawn, and Beacon of Unrest do), rebound won't get a chance to apply." 中文簡翻：當一個咒語於結算時會將自己移往其他區域時，彈回效應將不會生效。結論：擅闖時間、精研時序這類的咒語貼上彈回之後不能多賺一個回合。這部分是咱的理解錯誤。至於咱原本用來佐證的破墳： http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=175111 上面是叛徒之王塞基司，底下的規則(ry "If a creature returned to the battlefield with unearth would leave the battlefield for any reason, it's exiled instead -- unless the spell or ability that's causing the creature to leave the battlefield is actually trying to exile it! In that case, it succeeds at exiling it. If it later returns the creature card to the battlefield (as Oblivion Ring or Flickerwisp might, for example), the creature card will return to the battlefield as a new object with no relation to its previous existence. The unearth effect will no longer apply to it." 中文簡翻：當一個生物以破墳的方式進入戰場後，因任何效應離場時，改為將其放逐之─ ─除非該效應本身便是將該生物放逐。在此情形下，該生物將正常的被放逐。但若它在稍後因任何效應移回戰場(如遺忘輪)，則該生物將會以全新的物件返回。破墳的效果不再影響該生物。結論：咱引述的破墳規則本身是正確的，但基於破墳本身的規則去推論彈回這點錯誤。(因為兩者規則完全不同) 因此產生了這次的規則混淆。以上。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.162.61.16 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Magic/M.1425525262.A.633.html

推

a921103030

03/05 12:11, , 1^F

03/05 12:11, 1^F

→

a921103030

03/05 12:11, , 2^F

03/05 12:11, 2^F

→

a921103030

03/05 12:11, , 3^F

03/05 12:11, 3^F