Re: [問題] 彈回碰上buyback跟flashback

看板Magic作者 (穹光孤翼)時間14年前 (2010/05/13 03:19), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/7 (看更多)
※ 引述《lagerway (^^"....)》之銘言: : BUYBACK : You may pay an additional {3} as you cast this spell. If you do, put this card : into your hand as it resolves.) : REBOUND : If you cast this spell from your hand, exile it as it resolves. At the beginni : ng of your next upkeep, you may cast this card from exile without paying its m : ana cost. : 兩個都是as it resolves產生效應,為什麼使用buyback rebound不會發生作用?? : (還是FAQ有特別講??) : 我一直以為當Exile與回手同時作用時 Exile > 回手 : 就像flashback被Remand康掉時 會Exile一樣 : 而Rebound是Exile flashback是回手 : 所以這跟我原本認知不同QQ Remand [1][U] Instant Counter target spell. If that spell is countered this way, put it into its owner's hand instead of into that player's graveyard. Draw a card. 因為當你Remand從墓地返照的咒語 結算時被放逐而非進入墓地 而Remand是以"卡片回手"替代掉"進墳場"的動作 自然替代不掉被放逐的效果 === 而Rebound跟Buyback的效果是同時點觸發的 放逐跟回手沒有誰先誰後的次序 在這個例子中 一個咒語同時有Rebound跟Buyback的話 "as it resolves"因為是同時點觸發 又是同個玩家操控的話 那是玩家決定這兩個觸發異能 誰先進堆疊誰後進 ROE FAQ * If a replacement effect would cause a spell with rebound that you cast from your hand to be put somewhere else instead of your graveyard (such as Leyline of the Void might), you choose whether to apply the rebound effect or the other effect as the spell resolves. 所以你可以讓Rebound後進先結算 放逐出去 也可以讓Buyback後進先結算 回到手牌 決定權都在玩家 -- . ◥◣ \ | . この願いは 罪ですか? ψlonewing2008 ` |/ ' Sperare   èpeccato? . ▎◢ . ' 奈落へと堕ちた 金色の蝶は . ██ . . 幾つの罪に 翅を濡らしてゆくの? ' ' うみねこのく頃に . ' /▅▇. ◥ . ' . 07th Expansion presents. Welcome to Rokkenjima. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.99.113
文章代碼(AID): #1BwlyjXb (Magic)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1BwlyjXb (Magic)