Re: [問題] 傷害不能被prevent?
※ 引述《neverbbs (真的!)》之銘言：
: 假設
: 反紅生物
: 在傷害不能被prevent的情況下
: 是否也是會被紅色來源造成傷害呢?
: protect from red 指的是prevent所有紅色傷害吧?
: 所以當Everlasting Torment在場上
: http://ww2.wizards.com/gatherer/CardDetails.aspx?&id=142036
: Players can't gain life.
: Damage can't be prevented.
: All damage is dealt as though its source had wither. (A source with wither
: deals damage to creatures in the form of -1/-1 counters.)
: 反色生物會被該色造成傷害並放上-1/-1 counters
: 這樣理解應該沒問題吧?
: 先在此感謝!
這是個好問題
我思考一會(大約5秒 囧>)覺得是不能做成傷害，即是不會放上-1/-1 counters
不過這還是要看原文怎樣寫才能確定
稍微查了一下，先看看rules 是怎樣寫的
502.80. Wither
502.80a Damage dealt to a creature by a source with wither doesn't stay on
that creature (see rule 212.3g). Rather, it causes that many -1/-1 counters
to be put on that creature.
502.80b Multiple instances of wither on the same object are redundant.
然後再看看官方的解釋
Wither isn't a replacement ability—it doesn't replace dealing damage with
something else—precisely because that would interact in potentially
confusing ways with abilities such as lifelink and deathtouch. To avoid that,
wither changes a variable that's never been altered before: what damage does
when it's dealt.
這說明wither不是一個代替性異能
一切和傷害有關的rules和異能也可以正常運作
例如lifelink, deathtouch, 這當然也包括prevent damage
source: http://0rz.tw/1c511
內裡有更詳盡的解釋和例子，有興的可以點進去後搜尋wither
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.160.168.63
※ 編輯: cetong 來自: 58.160.168.63 (11/12 08:14)
推
11/12 08:18, , 1F
11/12 08:18, 1F
抱歉....我眼殘
沒看到Damage can't be prevented.這行 <囧>
直覺性覺得是問prevent damage和wither的關係
刪除了文中錯誤的答案
以下才是原問題的正確答案
在Damage can't be prevented的情況下，的確可以對反色生物做成傷害
※ 編輯: cetong 來自: 58.160.168.63 (11/12 08:28)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：