[問題] Josh Hamilton可以拿到多大的合約?
如題
今年上半季如鬼神班的MVP大熱門
Josh Hamilton
雖然依然繳出
AVG 0.285, RBI 128, HR 43
非常不錯的成績
但這樣的成績應該還是會讓許多遊騎兵迷失望
現年31歲,今年的成績也非常有可能是生涯年
拼勁十分受到讚賞
攻守也十分全面的好球員
但傷勢似乎也有隱憂
最重要的是
他今年最後幾場的表現
一定讓球團本身以及球迷印象深刻
連球迷都發出了噓聲
也因此,原本應該上看有25M/y 的年薪
會不會就因為這幾場打不好,以及下半季只有凡人的表現
而變成只有20M/y的行情
並且也降低了遊騎兵無論如何都要留住他的意願??
雖然他真的可以說是德州的看板球星
但遊騎兵開出8年200M的薪資是有可能的嗎?
(雖然有A-rod的前例,但今年Josh Hamilton的成績也沒當年的A-rod好)
不知道各位板友的看法怎樣?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 119.14.28.21
→
10/06 21:53, , 1F
10/06 21:53, 1F
推
10/06 21:54, , 2F
10/06 21:54, 2F
→
10/06 21:54, , 3F
10/06 21:54, 3F
→
10/06 21:55, , 4F
10/06 21:55, 4F
→
10/06 21:56, , 5F
10/06 21:56, 5F
推
10/06 21:56, , 6F
10/06 21:56, 6F
→
10/06 21:56, , 7F
10/06 21:56, 7F
→
10/06 21:56, , 8F
10/06 21:56, 8F
推
10/06 21:57, , 9F
10/06 21:57, 9F
推
10/06 21:58, , 10F
10/06 21:58, 10F
推
10/06 21:58, , 11F
10/06 21:58, 11F
推
10/06 21:58, , 12F
10/06 21:58, 12F
→
10/06 21:59, , 13F
10/06 21:59, 13F
→
10/06 21:59, , 14F
10/06 21:59, 14F
推
10/06 21:59, , 15F
10/06 21:59, 15F
→
10/06 22:00, , 16F
10/06 22:00, 16F
→
10/06 22:01, , 17F
10/06 22:01, 17F
→
10/06 22:01, , 18F
10/06 22:01, 18F
推
10/06 22:02, , 19F
10/06 22:02, 19F
推
10/06 22:03, , 20F
10/06 22:03, 20F
推
10/06 22:03, , 21F
10/06 22:03, 21F
推
10/06 22:08, , 22F
10/06 22:08, 22F
推
10/06 22:08, , 23F
10/06 22:08, 23F
→
10/06 22:08, , 24F
10/06 22:08, 24F
→
10/06 22:10, , 25F
10/06 22:10, 25F
→
10/06 22:10, , 26F
10/06 22:10, 26F
→
10/06 22:11, , 27F
10/06 22:11, 27F
→
10/06 22:11, , 28F
10/06 22:11, 28F
推
10/06 22:13, , 29F
10/06 22:13, 29F
推
10/06 22:14, , 30F
10/06 22:14, 30F
推
10/06 22:15, , 31F
10/06 22:15, 31F
推
10/06 22:15, , 32F
10/06 22:15, 32F
推
10/06 22:16, , 33F
10/06 22:16, 33F
推
10/06 22:16, , 34F
10/06 22:16, 34F
推
10/06 22:17, , 35F
10/06 22:17, 35F
→
10/06 22:20, , 36F
10/06 22:20, 36F
推
10/06 22:23, , 37F
10/06 22:23, 37F
推
10/06 22:24, , 38F
10/06 22:24, 38F
→
10/06 22:25, , 39F
10/06 22:25, 39F
還有 92 則推文
→
10/06 23:10, , 132F
10/06 23:10, 132F
→
10/06 23:10, , 133F
10/06 23:10, 133F
→
10/06 23:11, , 134F
10/06 23:11, 134F
推
10/06 23:11, , 135F
10/06 23:11, 135F
→
10/06 23:12, , 136F
10/06 23:12, 136F
→
10/06 23:12, , 137F
10/06 23:12, 137F
→
10/06 23:12, , 138F
10/06 23:12, 138F
推
10/06 23:13, , 139F
10/06 23:13, 139F
推
10/06 23:13, , 140F
10/06 23:13, 140F
→
10/06 23:14, , 141F
10/06 23:14, 141F
→
10/06 23:15, , 142F
10/06 23:15, 142F
推
10/06 23:16, , 143F
10/06 23:16, 143F
→
10/06 23:17, , 144F
10/06 23:17, 144F
→
10/06 23:17, , 145F
10/06 23:17, 145F
推
10/06 23:19, , 146F
10/06 23:19, 146F
推
10/06 23:19, , 147F
10/06 23:19, 147F
→
10/06 23:20, , 148F
10/06 23:20, 148F
→
10/06 23:20, , 149F
10/06 23:20, 149F
→
10/06 23:20, , 150F
10/06 23:20, 150F
推
10/06 23:33, , 151F
10/06 23:33, 151F
推
10/06 23:52, , 152F
10/06 23:52, 152F
推
10/06 23:58, , 153F
10/06 23:58, 153F
推
10/07 00:01, , 154F
10/07 00:01, 154F
→
10/07 00:02, , 155F
10/07 00:02, 155F
→
10/07 00:03, , 156F
10/07 00:03, 156F
→
10/07 00:09, , 157F
10/07 00:09, 157F
推
10/07 00:12, , 158F
10/07 00:12, 158F
推
10/07 00:13, , 159F
10/07 00:13, 159F
推
10/07 00:20, , 160F
10/07 00:20, 160F
推
10/07 00:21, , 161F
10/07 00:21, 161F
推
10/07 00:33, , 162F
10/07 00:33, 162F
→
10/07 00:33, , 163F
10/07 00:33, 163F
推
10/07 00:35, , 164F
10/07 00:35, 164F
→
10/07 00:36, , 165F
10/07 00:36, 165F
推
10/07 01:07, , 166F
10/07 01:07, 166F
→
10/07 01:51, , 167F
10/07 01:51, 167F
→
10/07 02:00, , 168F
10/07 02:00, 168F
推
10/07 07:36, , 169F
10/07 07:36, 169F
推
10/07 13:39, , 170F
10/07 13:39, 170F
推
10/07 15:52, , 171F
10/07 15:52, 171F