Re: Yastrzemski: 三冠王我也是看報紙才知道

看板MLB作者時間13年前 (2012/10/04 21:20), 編輯推噓8(808)
留言16則, 12人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《abc12812 ()》之銘言: : http://tinyurl.com/9gzsevh : "In '67, the Triple Crown was never even mentioned once," Yastrzemski said : Wednesday night. "We were so involved in the pennant race, I didn't know I : won the Triple Crown until the next day, when I read it in the paper." : Yastrzemski "1967的時候三冠王從來沒被提起過 我們一直沉浸在分區冠軍爭奪賽中 : 我也是隔天看報紙才知道得了三冠王" 那年的MVP票選也很有趣 雖然Yastrzemski打出號稱夢幻般的一季 但在MVP票選並沒有獲得全票 Name Pts 1st HR AVG OBP SLG Carl Yastrzemski 275 19 44 .326 .418 .622 Harmon Killebrew 161 0 44 Bill Freehan 137 0 Joe Horlen 91 0 Al Kaline 88 0 Jim Lonborg 82 0 Jim Fregosi 70 0 Cesar Tovar 70 1 6 .267 .325 .365 逃走的那一票是明尼蘇達的記者 而這票並不是投給並列全壘打王的Killebrew 而是投給多功能工具人Cesar Tovar 記者事後解釋他的理由 “He played six positions for the Twins and I saw him win games for them at all six positions. We didn’t have the best of player relations on our club, but Tovar never got mixed up in any of the clubhouse politics. He kept plugging away, no matter where they put him, and to me he did a tremendous job. If I wanted to be a ‘homer,’ I would have voted for Harmon Killebrew. But Tovar was my choice and, if I had to do it all over again, I’d vote for him again.” -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.25.133

10/04 21:24, , 1F
每個人對MVP的定義不同 要求也不同 我只能這樣解釋了
10/04 21:24, 1F

10/04 21:31, , 2F
就是個工具人控
10/04 21:31, 2F

10/04 21:31, , 3F
MVP字面上本來就很模糊 最有價值....每人真的不同
10/04 21:31, 3F

10/04 21:34, , 4F
很好奇分區冠軍跟季末表現到底會佔多少比重
10/04 21:34, 4F

10/04 22:06, , 5F
我覺得那個記者只是自以為眼光獨到天生反骨- -
10/04 22:06, 5F

10/04 22:13, , 6F
去年 David Robertson 都有票了....
10/04 22:13, 6F

10/04 22:57, , 7F
請教各位 We didn’t have the best of player relation
10/04 22:57, 7F

10/04 22:59, , 8F
某一年金鋼以大比分輸球,全場只靠一支全壘打得一分
10/04 22:59, 8F

10/04 22:59, , 9F
結果打出這支全壘打的球員得單場MVP,原因是他讓球隊
10/04 22:59, 9F

10/04 23:00, , 10F
on our club but Tovar never got mixed up in any of
10/04 23:00, 10F

10/04 23:00, , 11F
達成單季全員都有全壘打紀錄,只能說票選的東西很主觀
10/04 23:00, 11F

10/04 23:00, , 12F
in any of the clubhouse politics. 這句大概意思
10/04 23:00, 12F

10/04 23:18, , 13F
這些記者不只很主觀 有些人更是常常故意不投大熱門
10/04 23:18, 13F

10/04 23:20, , 14F
所謂的反骨
10/04 23:20, 14F

10/04 23:28, , 15F
反觀同一年的國聯MVP就全票通過
10/04 23:28, 15F

10/05 12:26, , 16F
他在休息室不讓任何人不爽很重要啊.....
10/05 12:26, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #1GROqiu8 (MLB)
文章代碼(AID): #1GROqiu8 (MLB)