[外電] Diedre Pujols explains decision

看板MLB作者 (guest001)時間12年前 (2011/12/13 15:17), 編輯推噓54(54050)
留言104則, 48人參與, 最新討論串1/1
ESPN的新聞,紅雀一開始開130m/5y.............. 五樓說說紅雀到底有沒有想留人XDDDD http://goo.gl/4fhLo Diedre Pujols explains decision ESPN.com news services Albert Pujols' wife Diedre, in an interview with a radio station with ties to the former St. Louis Cardinals slugger, said the couple was prepared to take less money to stay in St. Louis, but were greatly disappointed when the team initially offered him a five-year deal. Thursday, Albert Pujols signed a 10-year, $254 million offer with the Los Angeles Angels that contained no deferred money, as well as a 10-year personal services contract following that deal. The Cardinals' last offer to Pujols was for 10 years and $210 million, with $30 million deferred. "The offer that people have seen on television I want to tell you what, listeners especially, had that offer been given to us with a guarantee, we would have the (Cardinals) bird on our back," Diedre Pujols told 99.1 Joy FM, a St. Louis-area Christian station that received some of its initial funding from Albert Pujols. Diedre Pujols, speaking with interviewer Sandi Brown, who is her friend, said the couple initially had no plans to ever leave St. Louis or the Cardinals, the only team the first baseman had ever played for. "When it all came down, I was mad. I was mad at God because I felt like all the signs that had been being played out through the baseball field, our foundation, our restaurant, the Down Syndrome Center, my relationships, my home, my family close," Diedre Pujols told the station. "I mean, we had no reason, not one reason, to want to leave. People were deceived by the numbers." She indicated the key moment was the Cardinals' initial offer of five years and $130 million. "When you have somebody say 'We want you to be a Cardinal for life' and only offer you a five-year deal, it kind of confused us," Diedre Pujols said. "Well, we got over that insult and felt like Albert had given so much of himself to baseball and into the community ... we didn't want to go through this again." Diedre Pujols told the station the negative reaction in St. Louis over her husband's decision to sign with the Angels has been striking. "Albert has never lied. People are like 'Oh, we thought we knew who he was.' Well, we thought we knew who they were," she told the station. "The city of St. Louis has absolutely been deceived and I have never seen hatred spread so fast and I understand why," she added. "Let me say that Albert and I never, not one time, ever made plans to leave this city." Diedre Pujols also said she had no ill will toward the Cardinals or owner Bill DeWitt and that she understands the fans' frustration with her husband's decision. "It's just like God," she said at the end of the interview, "to put us on a team called the Angels." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.204.26.9

12/13 15:19, , 1F
"The Decision" (誤
12/13 15:19, 1F

12/13 15:22, , 2F
五年完沒有五年的教練職嗎
12/13 15:22, 2F

12/13 15:24, , 3F
情與義 值零金
12/13 15:24, 3F

12/13 15:26, , 4F
合約後面差沒直接寫.慢走不送了...
12/13 15:26, 4F

12/13 15:29, , 5F
我以為只開 3年 六千萬 哈
12/13 15:29, 5F

12/13 15:30, , 6F
紅雀敢講這種合約本身就是一件很神奇的事
12/13 15:30, 6F

12/13 15:37, , 7F
要看有沒有加五年行政職
12/13 15:37, 7F

12/13 15:38, , 8F
五年真的很誇張..五年一億三千萬不知道有幾隊要搶zzzz
12/13 15:38, 8F

12/13 15:39, , 9F
從紅雀版轉戰到這裡來XD
12/13 15:39, 9F

12/13 15:43, , 10F
不夠積極吧...
12/13 15:43, 10F

12/13 15:46, , 11F
請問一下,合約裡那個deferred money是指什麼?謝謝
12/13 15:46, 11F

12/13 15:55, , 12F
應該是延遲給薪水的意思吧
12/13 15:55, 12F

12/13 15:56, , 13F
像馬林魚開個普吼獅的合約就有這條 不過天使簽的沒這條
12/13 15:56, 13F

12/13 16:03, , 14F
如有錯誤請訂正!!謝謝^^
12/13 16:03, 14F

12/13 16:30, , 15F
這根本吃人夠夠,走是對的
12/13 16:30, 15F

12/13 17:01, , 16F
祝普神帶領天使拿下世界大賽的冠軍
12/13 17:01, 16F

12/13 17:33, , 17F
= = 這價碼乾脆不要開....
12/13 17:33, 17F

12/13 17:54, , 18F
紅雀自知簽不下 乾脆當壞人(?
12/13 17:54, 18F

12/13 18:12, , 19F
但其實我覺得這樣滿理智的= =
12/13 18:12, 19F

12/13 18:13, , 20F
誇張XD
12/13 18:13, 20F

12/13 18:14, , 21F
五年真的蠻扯的XD
12/13 18:14, 21F

12/13 18:14, , 22F
沒簽還好 為了一個選手 綁死往後幾年的團隊薪資 不合啦!
12/13 18:14, 22F

12/13 18:30, , 23F
普神有弟弟在紅鳥擔任行政職嗎?
12/13 18:30, 23F

12/13 18:45, , 24F
其他球隊都不敢提低於7年,就紅雀敢提5年,擺明是利用Pujols對
12/13 18:45, 24F

12/13 18:46, , 25F
紅雀的愛
12/13 18:46, 25F

12/13 18:46, , 26F
紅雀的感情,如果有尊重Pujols的話,一開始至少也提個8年以上
12/13 18:46, 26F

12/13 18:47, , 27F
8Y/160M should be the starting point
12/13 18:47, 27F

12/13 19:00, , 28F
給一個31歲 今年成績下滑的選手8年約 並不聰明
12/13 19:00, 28F

12/13 19:01, , 29F
pujols對紅雀代表的跟一般球員完全不同
12/13 19:01, 29F

12/13 19:08, , 30F
真的很有愛就最後花點錢簽個一年約讓他在紅雀退休
12/13 19:08, 30F

12/13 19:09, , 31F
happy ending 不是花個200M簽一個開始要走下坡的球員
12/13 19:09, 31F

12/13 19:10, , 32F
紅雀:好啦 生涯最後一年 22K happy ending 有情有義 >.^
12/13 19:10, 32F

12/13 19:16, , 33F
出這價碼乾脆別出
12/13 19:16, 33F

12/13 19:22, , 34F
某人在搞笑嗎.pujols當代前幾問題不大.在歷史上也排的上號
12/13 19:22, 34F

12/13 19:22, , 35F
你以為這種球員多久能出一個...
12/13 19:22, 35F

12/13 19:23, , 36F
更可貴的是他從上MAJOR就在紅鳥.
12/13 19:23, 36F

12/13 19:24, , 37F
你翻翻最近20年.有幾個球員有這種背景
12/13 19:24, 37F

12/13 19:24, , 38F
基特:0.0/
12/13 19:24, 38F

12/13 19:24, , 39F
Mo:0.0/
12/13 19:24, 39F
還有 25 則推文
12/13 22:52, , 65F
前11Season WAR有80我還找不太到
12/13 22:52, 65F

12/13 23:02, , 66F
一開始就開八年以上總額接近200M 我相信簽得下來
12/13 23:02, 66F

12/13 23:06, , 67F
所以燒普侯斯球衣 說不定是準備改買天使的xd
12/13 23:06, 67F

12/13 23:15, , 68F
其實喊出 8 年 200M 普神很可能還是走, 但這個價紅鳥球團擺
12/13 23:15, 68F

12/13 23:16, , 69F
明就是討罵的...現在說甚麼都站不太住腳了...
12/13 23:16, 69F

12/13 23:22, , 70F
明年墊底吧 真沒誠意
12/13 23:22, 70F

12/13 23:34, , 71F
紅雀知道Pujols要的是怎樣長度的合約,一開始開5年就代表紅雀
12/13 23:34, 71F

12/13 23:34, , 72F
認為Pujols的價值,不值得紅雀跟他簽長約、承擔長約風險
12/13 23:34, 72F

12/13 23:35, , 73F
對Pujols來說,這表示紅雀已經暗示了不想留他的立場,之後的加
12/13 23:35, 73F

12/13 23:35, , 74F
碼與其說是想挽回,不如說是對球迷的交代
12/13 23:35, 74F

12/13 23:39, , 75F
之前還有一個八卦是紅鳥知道唯一競爭者馬大魚退出之後,又砍
12/13 23:39, 75F

12/13 23:39, , 76F
了價, 紅鳥站在球團角度開這價不為過, 那麼就別把輿論說成球
12/13 23:39, 76F

12/13 23:40, , 77F
員不給hometown discount, 我們盡力了之類的, 好聚好散唄:P
12/13 23:40, 77F

12/13 23:40, , 78F
其實我也覺得紅鳥合理可以開的價大概就是6-7年150~180M上下
12/13 23:40, 78F

12/13 23:42, , 79F
但如果這價屬實, 有一點比較糟的是Holliday是7年120M,Pujols
12/13 23:42, 79F

12/13 23:43, , 80F
我沒記錯跟Pujols是前後天生日(差一天還兩天),怎麼球團不覺
12/13 23:43, 80F

12/13 23:44, , 81F
得能給Pujols至少6+1呢? 似乎這合約有點太精太欺負自家人吧?
12/13 23:44, 81F

12/14 00:05, , 82F
普神走了我還考慮要不要支持紅鳥 這下我完全沒有懸念了
12/14 00:05, 82F

12/14 00:27, , 83F
生涯前11季有80WAR的 BR哥一定知道
12/14 00:27, 83F

12/14 00:30, , 84F
現在的價值觀很神奇 一定要說未來8年保證付你200M
12/14 00:30, 84F

12/14 00:30, , 85F
這樣才"尊重"球員
12/14 00:30, 85F

12/14 00:31, , 86F
.....去死吧 被簽走活該
12/14 00:31, 86F

12/14 00:31, , 87F
就只會丟這種約那隨便抓個鄉民去當GM就好了
12/14 00:31, 87F

12/14 00:54, , 88F
季初開打前肯推出長約, 到了季後一開始只推出五年合約
12/14 00:54, 88F

12/14 00:55, , 89F
前後態度差很大一定是個讓pujols決心走人的因素
12/14 00:55, 89F

12/14 01:49, , 90F
不是丟個大合約就是尊重 但不尊重可以從某些地方看得出來...
12/14 01:49, 90F

12/14 01:50, , 91F
像我是小球隊的球迷 我很清楚甚麼叫做球團採用溫情手段留人
12/14 01:50, 91F

12/14 01:50, , 92F
但紅鳥實在是一直想辦法把普神送出門 這就真的不是端合約這
12/14 01:50, 92F

12/14 01:50, , 93F
麼單純的一個問題了...
12/14 01:50, 93F

12/14 02:16, , 94F
對 關鍵就在紅雀談合約方式不像是在想要留普神 雖說到最後
12/14 02:16, 94F

12/14 02:18, , 95F
開到10年約 從最早談延長到真進FA過程中態度 是關鍵
12/14 02:18, 95F

12/14 06:47, , 96F
紅雀本來就不值得留戀 第一張合約就看得出來...
12/14 06:47, 96F

12/14 06:55, , 97F
怎麼看也覺得天使老闆有誠意太多了...
12/14 06:55, 97F

12/14 08:07, , 98F
球團在商言商,就不要怪球員為自身打算....
12/14 08:07, 98F

12/14 08:59, , 99F
紅雀大概也覺得沒差了 反正用普神拿到兩次了 賺夠了..
12/14 08:59, 99F

12/14 08:59, , 100F
小合約簽到賺到 簽不到就讓他走..
12/14 08:59, 100F

12/14 09:30, , 101F
紅雀開這種價 對照他給紅雀的 PUJOLS沒留下個PUJOLS魔咒已經
12/14 09:30, 101F

12/14 09:30, , 102F
不錯了 還要要求啥?
12/14 09:30, 102F

12/14 12:24, , 103F
曾孫未來的百年,紅雀(  ̄ c ̄)y▂ξ
12/14 12:24, 103F

12/14 13:04, , 104F
誇張 這種約難怪會不考慮
12/14 13:04, 104F
文章代碼(AID): #1EvlmI4z (MLB)