[情報] Pierzynski, Utley 'Meanest' in MLB
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22297882/31976603
In a poll of 215 major-league players conducted by Sports Illustrated, White
Sox catcher A.J. Pierzynski was voted as the "meanest" player in baseball,
taking home 29 percent of the vote. Phillies second baseman Chase Utley (13
percent), now-jobless Milton Bradley (11 percent), soon-to-be-jobless Carlos
Zambrano (five percent) and Dodgers reliever Vicente Padilla (four percent)
were the other names that most frequently came up in the poll.
From the SI press release, White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen said the following
about Pierzynski: If you play against him, you hate him. If you play with
him, you hate him a little less.”
I can't say it's surprising that Pierzynski isn't well liked by his peers.
That's been common knowledge for a while ... but, "meanest?" Really?
Isn't this the sign we're getting a little too sensitive as a society? Maybe
biggest jerk or most annoying would sound better and yield similar results --
maybe even "biggest antagonist?" -- but "meanest" just has this connotation
like we're some child cowering in the corner because classmate isn't very
nice and we can't take it. So we'll run home to Mommy and Daddy and tell them
about the mean guy. I would hope that if some player specifically said "A.J.
is so mean!" that our collective response would be to man up and quit
whining. But hey, to each his own.
Now, to be fair, we can't blame the players for answering. They were simply
asked a question and answered it. And to be fair to SI, I'm probably
overreacting to its attempt to come up with an MLB equivalent to "dirtiest
player," which they ask in other sports.
I will say I was quite surprised that Pierzynski beat out the likes of
Zambrano and Bradley here, but I'm no player. I guess they'd know better who
is "mean."
沒想到追追會在榜上...甚至還比大Z高 (No.4)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.28.114
※ 編輯: Zamned 來自: 118.160.28.114 (09/15 19:41)
推
09/15 19:44, , 1F
09/15 19:44, 1F
推
09/15 19:44, , 2F
09/15 19:44, 2F
推
09/15 19:45, , 3F
09/15 19:45, 3F
推
09/15 19:49, , 4F
09/15 19:49, 4F
推
09/15 19:51, , 5F
09/15 19:51, 5F
→
09/15 19:53, , 6F
09/15 19:53, 6F
推
09/15 19:57, , 7F
09/15 19:57, 7F
→
09/15 19:58, , 8F
09/15 19:58, 8F
→
09/15 19:58, , 9F
09/15 19:58, 9F
→
09/15 20:00, , 10F
09/15 20:00, 10F
→
09/15 20:01, , 11F
09/15 20:01, 11F
→
09/15 20:01, , 12F
09/15 20:01, 12F
推
09/15 20:02, , 13F
09/15 20:02, 13F
推
09/15 20:25, , 14F
09/15 20:25, 14F
推
09/15 20:35, , 15F
09/15 20:35, 15F
→
09/15 20:36, , 16F
09/15 20:36, 16F
→
09/15 20:37, , 17F
09/15 20:37, 17F
推
09/15 20:46, , 18F
09/15 20:46, 18F
推
09/15 20:55, , 19F
09/15 20:55, 19F
推
09/15 21:00, , 20F
09/15 21:00, 20F
→
09/15 21:16, , 21F
09/15 21:16, 21F
推
09/15 21:29, , 22F
09/15 21:29, 22F
推
09/15 22:12, , 23F
09/15 22:12, 23F
→
09/15 22:19, , 24F
09/15 22:19, 24F
→
09/15 22:19, , 25F
09/15 22:19, 25F
推
09/15 22:22, , 26F
09/15 22:22, 26F
→
09/15 22:23, , 27F
09/15 22:23, 27F
→
09/15 22:23, , 28F
09/15 22:23, 28F
推
09/15 22:26, , 29F
09/15 22:26, 29F
推
09/15 22:26, , 30F
09/15 22:26, 30F
→
09/15 22:26, , 31F
09/15 22:26, 31F
→
09/15 22:28, , 32F
09/15 22:28, 32F
推
09/15 22:48, , 33F
09/15 22:48, 33F
→
09/15 22:48, , 34F
09/15 22:48, 34F
推
09/15 23:09, , 35F
09/15 23:09, 35F
推
09/15 23:16, , 36F
09/15 23:16, 36F
推
09/15 23:22, , 37F
09/15 23:22, 37F
→
09/15 23:22, , 38F
09/15 23:22, 38F
→
09/15 23:22, , 39F
09/15 23:22, 39F
→
09/15 23:23, , 40F
09/15 23:23, 40F
→
09/15 23:23, , 41F
09/15 23:23, 41F
→
09/15 23:24, , 42F
09/15 23:24, 42F
→
09/15 23:25, , 43F
09/15 23:25, 43F
推
09/15 23:33, , 44F
09/15 23:33, 44F
推
09/15 23:34, , 45F
09/15 23:34, 45F
推
09/15 23:41, , 46F
09/15 23:41, 46F
推
09/15 23:50, , 47F
09/15 23:50, 47F
推
09/15 23:55, , 48F
09/15 23:55, 48F
推
09/16 10:56, , 49F
09/16 10:56, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：