※ 引述《CanoNYY (CanoNYY)》之銘言：
: 2011 Cy Young Predictor - NL
: RK PLAYER TEAM CYP G GS IP ER SO SV SHO W-L ERA VB
: 1 Ian Kennedy ARI 179.1 30 30 202.0 65 178 0 1 19- 4 2.90 10
: 2 Cliff Lee PHI 174.2 28 28 203.2 56 204 0 6 16- 7 2.47 12
: 3 Roy Halladay PHI 170.8 28 28 202.2 56 195 0 0 16- 5 2.49 12
: 4 Clayton Kershaw LAD 170.8 29 29 205.2 56 222 0 2 17- 5 2.45 0
: 5 Craig Kimbrel ATL 163.8 71 0 69.2 12 115 43 0 4- 2 1.55 0
: 6 John Axford MIL 148.7 66 0 64.2 16 75 41 0 2- 2 2.23 12
: 7 Cole Hamels PHI 148.0 28 28 194.0 56 171 0 0 14- 7 2.60 12
: 8 Brian Wilson SF 132.6 55 0 53.2 19 52 35 0 6- 4 3.19 2
: 9 Drew Storen WSH 132.6 62 0 64.1 23 58 34 0 6- 3 3.22 0
: 10 J.J. Putz ARI 131.8 52 0 51.1 14 51 38 0 2- 2 2.45 10
其實若按照國內媒體的擊敗王牌論
身為一個ACE，最重要的工作就是擊敗對方的王牌是吧? XD
來看看IPK在王牌對決時的戰績吧
Opp IP ER BB SO W-L ERA
U-ball 6.0 3 3 3 0-0
Kershaw 7.0 3 1 3 1-0
Lee 9.0 0 0 10 1-0
Lincecum 15.0 1 5 14 1-0
Cain 8.0 2 1 7 1-0
Greinke 7.0 0 2 5 1-0
---------------------------------------
52.0 9 12 42 5-0 1.55
IPK本季對戰ACE是全勝無敗還有很好的ERA
可見IPK才是真正的大比賽投手，不是只會靠欺負鳥投搶勝 (誤)
有興趣的話還可以查查一些特殊情況的數據
(ex: 2 outs RISP, Late & Close, High Lvrge, Pitch 101+)
IPK在這些特殊情況下的表現還蠻妙的就是
ps: 大家也可以看看其他ACE間的對戰狀況
我印象中是沒有人全勝無敗就是了
--
理性 勿戰
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.109.64.160
推
09/09 20:46, , 1F
09/09 20:46, 1F
推
09/09 20:47, , 2F
09/09 20:47, 2F
推
09/09 20:48, , 3F
09/09 20:48, 3F
推
09/09 20:50, , 4F
09/09 20:50, 4F
→
09/09 20:50, , 5F
09/09 20:50, 5F
推
09/09 20:50, , 6F
09/09 20:50, 6F
→
09/09 20:50, , 7F
09/09 20:50, 7F
推
09/09 20:53, , 8F
09/09 20:53, 8F
→
09/09 20:53, , 9F
09/09 20:53, 9F
推
09/09 20:55, , 10F
09/09 20:55, 10F
推
09/09 20:58, , 11F
09/09 20:58, 11F
→
09/09 21:00, , 12F
09/09 21:00, 12F
推
09/09 21:06, , 13F
09/09 21:06, 13F
推
09/09 21:06, , 14F
09/09 21:06, 14F
→
09/09 21:13, , 15F
09/09 21:13, 15F
推
09/09 21:14, , 16F
09/09 21:14, 16F
推
09/09 21:16, , 17F
09/09 21:16, 17F
推
09/09 21:22, , 18F
09/09 21:22, 18F
推
09/09 21:24, , 19F
09/09 21:24, 19F
推
09/09 21:25, , 20F
09/09 21:25, 20F
推
09/09 21:25, , 21F
09/09 21:25, 21F
→
09/09 21:28, , 22F
09/09 21:28, 22F
推
09/09 21:29, , 23F
09/09 21:29, 23F
推
09/09 21:29, , 24F
09/09 21:29, 24F
推
09/09 21:31, , 25F
09/09 21:31, 25F
→
09/09 21:32, , 26F
09/09 21:32, 26F
推
09/09 21:58, , 27F
09/09 21:58, 27F
→
09/09 22:01, , 28F
09/09 22:01, 28F
推
09/09 22:02, , 29F
09/09 22:02, 29F
推
09/09 22:03, , 30F
09/09 22:03, 30F
推
09/09 22:06, , 31F
09/09 22:06, 31F
推
09/09 22:18, , 32F
09/09 22:18, 32F
推
09/09 22:23, , 33F
09/09 22:23, 33F
推
09/09 22:31, , 34F
09/09 22:31, 34F
推
09/09 23:17, , 35F
09/09 23:17, 35F
推
09/09 23:23, , 36F
09/09 23:23, 36F
→
09/09 23:38, , 37F
09/09 23:38, 37F
推
09/09 23:47, , 38F
09/09 23:47, 38F
推
09/10 00:17, , 39F
09/10 00:17, 39F
推
09/10 00:19, , 40F
09/10 00:19, 40F
推
09/10 00:20, , 41F
09/10 00:20, 41F
推
09/10 00:28, , 42F
09/10 00:28, 42F
推
09/10 00:30, , 43F
09/10 00:30, 43F
推
09/10 00:34, , 44F
09/10 00:34, 44F
推
09/10 00:40, , 45F
09/10 00:40, 45F
推
09/10 01:12, , 46F
09/10 01:12, 46F
推
09/10 01:17, , 47F
09/10 01:17, 47F
推
09/10 01:25, , 48F
09/10 01:25, 48F
推
09/10 01:40, , 49F
09/10 01:40, 49F
推
09/10 01:46, , 50F
09/10 01:46, 50F
推
09/10 02:10, , 51F
09/10 02:10, 51F
→
09/10 02:52, , 52F
09/10 02:52, 52F
推
09/10 03:16, , 53F
09/10 03:16, 53F
推
09/10 09:04, , 54F
09/10 09:04, 54F
推
09/10 10:30, , 55F
09/10 10:30, 55F
推
09/10 15:02, , 56F
09/10 15:02, 56F
推
09/10 17:39, , 57F
09/10 17:39, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)