Baseball won't go the way of the NBA
http://tinyurl.com/6e2dzdz
Much of the last week (if not, in fact, the past six months) has been devoted
to wailing and gnashing about Carmelo Anthony and what his insistence to play
for the Knicks means for the NBA. As a Cleveland fan, I'm certainly sensitive
to the issue of elite players using their free agency leverage to engineer
hand-picked “power” teams. Trust me, I've been there.
Is this good for the NBA? Frankly, I don't care all that much. It's the NBA.
I'll get by.
More interesting to me is the question, “What does this mean for baseball?"
To be honest, I don't think it means a damned thing.
Baseball teams have been putting together collections of elite talent for the
entire modern free-agency era, arguably since the end of the 19th century.
Sure, there have been flurries of arguments against a high-budget team
(usually the Yankees) putting together an unbeatable juggernaut at the
expense of the so-called “little guys,” but this rarely materializes. I see
a couple obvious factors here, and one surprising one.
One obvious one is roster size. One player on an NBA roster makes up 20
percent of the team in play and about 8 percent of the whole team: In MLB,
these numbers are more like 10 percent and 4 percent. If an NBA team gets
three elite players, they make up 60 percent of the starting lineup, and
probably play on the order of 50 percent of the total minutes. If the
Phillies sign even as many as four elite starting pitchers, they still need a
bullpen, offense, and defense.
Another factor is that one elite player can have a disproportionate impact on
a basketball game. Not only did LeBron James lead a team of role players to
the NBA Finals in 2007, but the Detroit Pistons of the early-00's were the
only team in recent memory (since 1980, say?) to win the Finals without
having one of the five best players in the NBA on the squad. In contrast, not
only did Felix Hernandez, good enough to win the Cy Young he deserved, not
lead the Seattle Mariners to a winning record, he didn't do so while having
Cliff Lee in the same rotation.
That seems like another factor: Admittedly, I'm a much bigger baseball fan
than NBA fan, but it just seems like there are more players in MLB that can
be considered really excellent compared to their peers. (Of course, there are
twice as many positions, too.)
The surprising reason, however, might be at least partially explained by the
salary cap (or lack thereof). There was no way for New Jersey to offer
Anthony a different amount of money than New York. While Cleveland could
offer James more money than any other team, it was only one more year, and
the percentage difference was fixed. In contrast, the woeful Detroit Tigers
were able to entice Ivan Rodriguez with what was considered a
disproportionate offer at the time, and although such plans don't always bear
fruit (Jayson Werth's deal with Washington comes to mind as the most recent
example of one not likely to work), the Tigers did win the AL Pennant in 2006.
Also, there are more ways to put together a playoff-caliber team in MLB,
which is why we've seen teams like Tampa Bay, San Francisco, Texas, St.
Louis, and Philadelphia in the World Series in recent years. The baseball
playoffs are more susceptible to randomness, too: It's pretty rare for an NBA
champion to be a team that pulled several upsets en route to their title.
I'm not saying one sport is better than the other: You're here, so you
probably share my opinion on the subject. But I'm pretty confident that while
the NBA landscape might have been changed significantly for the foreseeable
future, the MLB landscape looks pretty much unaffected by it.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.25.133
推
03/01 13:27, , 1F
03/01 13:27, 1F
推
03/01 13:42, , 2F
03/01 13:42, 2F
→
03/01 13:43, , 3F
03/01 13:43, 3F
→
03/01 14:15, , 4F
03/01 14:15, 4F
→
03/01 14:22, , 5F
03/01 14:22, 5F
推
03/01 14:36, , 6F
03/01 14:36, 6F
→
03/01 14:37, , 7F
03/01 14:37, 7F
→
03/01 14:38, , 8F
03/01 14:38, 8F
→
03/01 14:38, , 9F
03/01 14:38, 9F
→
03/01 14:57, , 10F
03/01 14:57, 10F
推
03/01 15:34, , 11F
03/01 15:34, 11F
推
03/01 15:35, , 12F
03/01 15:35, 12F
→
03/01 15:36, , 13F
03/01 15:36, 13F
→
03/01 15:44, , 14F
03/01 15:44, 14F
→
03/01 15:50, , 15F
03/01 15:50, 15F
推
03/01 16:34, , 16F
03/01 16:34, 16F
→
03/01 16:35, , 17F
03/01 16:35, 17F
推
03/01 16:41, , 18F
03/01 16:41, 18F
推
03/01 16:53, , 19F
03/01 16:53, 19F
→
03/01 17:08, , 20F
03/01 17:08, 20F
→
03/01 17:08, , 21F
03/01 17:08, 21F
推
03/01 17:14, , 22F
03/01 17:14, 22F
推
03/01 17:16, , 23F
03/01 17:16, 23F
推
03/01 17:17, , 24F
03/01 17:17, 24F
→
03/01 17:18, , 25F
03/01 17:18, 25F
→
03/01 17:18, , 26F
03/01 17:18, 26F
→
03/01 17:24, , 27F
03/01 17:24, 27F
→
03/01 17:25, , 28F
03/01 17:25, 28F
→
03/01 17:26, , 29F
03/01 17:26, 29F
→
03/01 17:28, , 30F
03/01 17:28, 30F
→
03/01 17:28, , 31F
03/01 17:28, 31F
→
03/01 17:29, , 32F
03/01 17:29, 32F
→
03/01 17:29, , 33F
03/01 17:29, 33F
→
03/01 17:30, , 34F
03/01 17:30, 34F
→
03/01 17:31, , 35F
03/01 17:31, 35F
→
03/01 17:33, , 36F
03/01 17:33, 36F
推
03/01 17:40, , 37F
03/01 17:40, 37F
推
03/01 17:42, , 38F
03/01 17:42, 38F
→
03/01 17:42, , 39F
03/01 17:42, 39F
→
03/01 17:47, , 40F
03/01 17:47, 40F
推
03/01 17:52, , 41F
03/01 17:52, 41F
→
03/01 17:54, , 42F
03/01 17:54, 42F
→
03/01 17:56, , 43F
03/01 17:56, 43F
→
03/01 17:56, , 44F
03/01 17:56, 44F
→
03/01 17:57, , 45F
03/01 17:57, 45F
推
03/01 18:03, , 46F
03/01 18:03, 46F
→
03/01 18:03, , 47F
03/01 18:03, 47F
→
03/01 18:03, , 48F
03/01 18:03, 48F
推
03/01 18:03, , 49F
03/01 18:03, 49F
推
03/01 18:04, , 50F
03/01 18:04, 50F
→
03/01 18:04, , 51F
03/01 18:04, 51F
→
03/01 18:05, , 52F
03/01 18:05, 52F
推
03/01 18:12, , 53F
03/01 18:12, 53F
推
03/01 18:14, , 54F
03/01 18:14, 54F
→
03/01 18:15, , 55F
03/01 18:15, 55F
→
03/01 18:15, , 56F
03/01 18:15, 56F
→
03/01 18:16, , 57F
03/01 18:16, 57F
推
03/01 18:16, , 58F
03/01 18:16, 58F
推
03/01 18:29, , 59F
03/01 18:29, 59F
推
03/01 18:35, , 60F
03/01 18:35, 60F
→
03/01 18:35, , 61F
03/01 18:35, 61F
→
03/01 18:36, , 62F
03/01 18:36, 62F
推
03/01 18:36, , 63F
03/01 18:36, 63F
推
03/01 18:48, , 64F
03/01 18:48, 64F
推
03/01 18:52, , 65F
03/01 18:52, 65F
→
03/01 18:53, , 66F
03/01 18:53, 66F
→
03/01 18:53, , 67F
03/01 18:53, 67F
推
03/01 19:07, , 68F
03/01 19:07, 68F
→
03/01 19:08, , 69F
03/01 19:08, 69F
→
03/01 19:08, , 70F
03/01 19:08, 70F
→
03/01 19:09, , 71F
03/01 19:09, 71F
→
03/01 19:10, , 72F
03/01 19:10, 72F
推
03/01 19:11, , 73F
03/01 19:11, 73F
→
03/01 19:11, , 74F
03/01 19:11, 74F
→
03/01 19:12, , 75F
03/01 19:12, 75F
→
03/01 19:13, , 76F
03/01 19:13, 76F
推
03/01 19:59, , 77F
03/01 19:59, 77F
推
03/01 20:00, , 78F
03/01 20:00, 78F
推
03/01 20:02, , 79F
03/01 20:02, 79F
→
03/01 20:03, , 80F
03/01 20:03, 80F
推
03/01 20:11, , 81F
03/01 20:11, 81F
推
03/01 20:19, , 82F
03/01 20:19, 82F
→
03/01 22:04, , 83F
03/01 22:04, 83F
→
03/01 22:04, , 84F
03/01 22:04, 84F
→
03/01 23:46, , 85F
03/01 23:46, 85F