Re: 2010 Five Questions: Milwaukee Brewers
※ 引述《sjvious (LoveIsSweetMisery)》之銘言：
: 有錯還請推文告知，小弟會立刻修改。
幫修正一些語意頗為詭異的地方
: At least there are some new faces. Along with Gallardo, the top of the
: rotation will include free-agent lefties Randy Wolf and Doug Davis. Between
: them, CHONE predicts that the Crew will get about 330 innings of sub-4.50
: pitching. Compared to replacement level, Wolf was a bit pricey. Compared to
: the disaster that was 2009 Brewers starting pitching, Wolf is a savior.
: 至少有三位是新面孔。除了 Gallardo 前段輪值還包含了FA簽來的 Randy Wolf 以及
: Doug Davis。CHONE 預測他們兩個大概能有330局的工作量且 ERA 低於 4.50。以市場
: 價格來說 Wolf 確實有一點點貴，但對於去年殘破的輪值，Wolf 顯然是一位酒鬼救星。
replacement level還是直譯出來較好 用"市場價值"去替代有點不妥
: Then there's Jeff Suppan. In a logical world, the Brewers would cut him
: loose, suffer the emotional pain of a $12 million sunk cost, and give his
: innings to someone—anyone—else. In this world, he may well end up with a
: rotation spot. He will give up a lot of runs.
: 再來是 Jeff Suppan，邏輯上來說酒鬼應該買斷他12M的肥約，甚至賣給其他潘那
: 但現實的結果是，他是球隊的第五號先發，且會設法減少他自己的失分。(??)
應該說：
如果酒鬼理智的話應該會想乾脆丟掉Suppan，寧願承受那丟到水裡的12M然後把他的局數
通通丟給隨便哪個人吃都好。
但是回歸現實，他大概仍會是輪值的一份子，然後繼續丟一堆分數...
: Even if Suppan sticks in the rotation for most of the season, this is a
: much-improved rotation. It doesn't look like a playoff-caliber one, but if
: Parra (still only 27) puts things together and rebounds to something like his
: 2008 season, it might be good enough to get the job done.
: 假使說 Suppan 罩得住的話，這輪值已經比去年進步很多了。雖然看起來不像能打進
: 季後賽的輪值，但如果才27歲的 Parra 能再度投出08年的好成績，看起來還有點搞頭。
你誤會stick這個字了 這裡stick in是"待在"的意思(有點negative的fu就是了)
所以應該是翻成：就算Suppan整季大部分時間都該死地待在先發，這仍會是個進步得多的
輪值。
: Officially, the Brewers aren't expecting much from the pair, but if both
: perform at the lower end of their offensive projections, it's easy to see an
: anemic overall offense result. For all that Ryan Braun and Prince Fielder can
: do, another down year from Corey Hart, a step back from Casey McGehee, and a
: couple of all-field youngsters could guarantee some awfully easy innings for
: opposing pitchers.
: 據傳，酒鬼對於兩隻新秀並沒有太高的期望，如果他們不能展現出進攻能力，那打線
: 看起來會相當貧弱。除了 Braun 跟 Fielder 外，在生涯低點的 Corey Hart 和退步
: 的 Casey McGehee 及兩隻年輕新秀，可以讓對手投起來很輕鬆。
第一句中間那句直譯成"如果他們的打擊都只能達到預測數據的下標..."會好一點
: Those annoyed by the constant low-level chatter about a long-term deal for
: Prince Fielder had better brace themselves. It ain't going away anytime soon.
: 這句不太會。
那些一直以來被有關小王子簽長約問題的低級討論弄得不爽的人，最好已經有心理準備了
。因為這些傳聞至少這一陣子都不會消失。
: A quick recap. Prince is now in his second season of arbitration. Last year,
: he signed a two-year deal that gave the club some cost certainty; this year,
: he's making $10.5 million. If Scott Boras and the Brewers settle on a
: one-year contract next year, we could be looking at something in Ryan Howard
: territory, pushing $20 million.
: 快速回顧：小王子正在薪資仲裁的第二年，去年他簽了2年約無疑給了酒鬼很大的支出
: 今年10.5M。如果 Bora$ 跟酒鬼談好明年簽一年約的話，猴兒的20M是對照組。
原文裡的some應該沒有"很大"的意思，這樣前後文看起來有點怪怪的
: It's conceivable that Milwaukee would do that. Between the low-cost Ryan
: Braun deal and Suppan's contract coming off the books, the money will be
: available. It's even possible that the Brewers could convince themselves that
: Fielder is worth a $150 million, seven-year megadeal.
: 是可以想像酒鬼高層會這麼做的。在 Braun 的佛心約和 Suppan 的肥約之間，酒鬼應該
: 還負擔得起。酒鬼甚至肖想7年150M綁住小王子是可行的。(哈哈哈---)
最後一句應該沒有你翻的那個意思，前面提到比照Howard的20M價碼，簽個一年20M的約
對酒鬼是沒有問題的，但是7y/150M就有點風險了(畢竟是7年平均高達22M...)
"甚至有可能酒鬼相信小王子是值得7y/150M這樣的超級大約的"←最後一句這樣翻就好了
: But this seems unlikely. First of all, Boras will want Fielder to test the
: rose-tinted waters of free agency. That probably rules out a long-term deal
: next winter. Second, while Fielder has shown some improvement at first base
: (-23 in 2006-07 to -7 in 2008-09, according to TotalZone), he's still a
: designated hitter in the not-too-distant future. The Brewers don't need one
: of those.
: 不過這似乎不太可能。首先，Bora$ 會希望小王子先到FA試試水溫。這或許排除了簽長約
: 的可能。其次，雖然小王子一壘的守備年年在進步，但不久的將來他也許會變打DH(??)
: 酒鬼一點都不想看到這些結果。
考慮他的體型，不久的將來會改打DH是possible的，你是對的。
: The Milwaukee front office isn't stupid. The odds that Fielder is wearing a
: Cerveceros uniform in 2012 are awfully low. Fielder can net a whole lot more
: than draft picks, and especially if the 2011 squad is shaping up to be
: another 80-win mediocrity, there's no reason to pay Fielder $20 million to be
: there. He might be part of a playoff run in 2010 or 2011, but it remains to
: be seen whether it's the Brewers he'll be leading into October.
: 酒鬼高層不是白癡。小王子在2012年穿Cerveceros制服的機率相當低。(??)
: 小王子比一大堆選秀全都還值錢，尤其是假使2011年的隊型還有可能拿下80勝的話
: 絕對沒有理由給只給他1年20M。10年或11年他可能會是季後賽的一份子，但仍有待
: 觀察他是不是那個帶領酒鬼前進10月的人。
Cerveceros是釀酒人的西班牙文，酒鬼在特殊的日子會改穿上胸前繡著這個字的球衣。
然後這後半段我想你是翻錯了，原文應該是說：如果2011這支隊伍仍然是隻80勝左右的
隊伍(換句話說，根本沒進步XD)，那麼根本沒有必要在小王子身上花上20M這筆錢。
最後一句則是說：或許小王子的身影還是會在往後兩個球季的季後賽中出現，但是到底
他所帶領的球隊會不會還是酒鬼就只能讓人拭目以待了。
如果我也有對原文理解錯誤的地方也歡迎指正喔:)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.217.50
※ 編輯: jdtrue 來自: 140.112.217.50 (04/02 04:51)
推
04/02 04:52, , 1F
04/02 04:52, 1F
→
04/02 10:00, , 2F
04/02 10:00, 2F
→
04/02 12:15, , 3F
04/02 12:15, 3F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇)：