Re: [消息] Twins, Luis Ayala Reach Agreement
結果..
為了完成這筆交易,
把Bobby Korecky移出了四十人名單,
然後就被ARI 撿去了,
真是令人無言...
為了一個擺明免洗,成績也在低點的RP,
放走了自己進步中的新人,
雖說Korecky一直被認為是low ceiling,
不過Ayala就有比較好嗎?
這交易意義到底在哪裡?
※ 引述《shancko (雅典等等我)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《zsxdaqwe (J I M)》之銘言:
: : According to Joe Christensen of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the Twins reached
: : an agreement with reliever Luis Ayala today on a one-year, $1.3MM deal.
: : He can earn another $575K in incentives. If met, he'd exceed his '08 salary of
: : $1.7MM.
: : Ayala was ranked as a Type B free agent after the season, but the Mets did not
: : offer him arbitration.
: : Ayala, 31, posted a 5.71 ERA in 75.6 innings for the Nationals and Mets last
: : year. He stuck out just 5.95 per nine innings, but showed good control with a
: : 2.85 BB/9. He showed an elevated groundball rate in his short stint with the
: : Mets.
: : =====================================================================
: : 到BR看一下他的GAMELOG,蠻多一局爆的,雖然以前在博覽會/國民ERA都還保持不錯
: : 不過就是H9偏高、K9偏低,希望Ayala加入牛棚後能幫助多多喔!
: : PS.簽了Ayala,是不是就代表有人要被交易了阿@@
: 說實話,我對於TWINS的操作看的有點膩了
: 大家都知道在投手方面
: 我們只缺一個很值得信任的setup
: FO不願意花多一點點的錢,或根本把type A排除在候選名單外
: 既然如此
: 我還比較能接受直接從3A或2A拉人上來賭賭看
: 一來省錢
: 二來TWINS最不缺的就是這種低K/9,但所謂"good control"的投手了
: 現在花1.3M去簽Luis Ayala根本是個雞肋合約
: 好像只是為了堵球迷的嘴,說球隊在offseason不是完全沒動作
: 我現在氣的半死中
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.222.122
→
02/20 00:12, , 1F
02/20 00:12, 1F
推
02/20 00:32, , 2F
02/20 00:32, 2F
推
02/20 00:36, , 3F
02/20 00:36, 3F
→
02/21 00:27, , 4F
02/21 00:27, 4F
→
02/21 00:27, , 5F
02/21 00:27, 5F
→
02/21 00:28, , 6F
02/21 00:28, 6F
→
02/21 16:03, , 7F
02/21 16:03, 7F
→
02/21 16:49, , 8F
02/21 16:49, 8F
→
02/21 16:49, , 9F
02/21 16:49, 9F
→
02/21 16:51, , 10F
02/21 16:51, 10F
→
02/21 17:43, , 11F
02/21 17:43, 11F
→
02/21 17:46, , 12F
02/21 17:46, 12F
→
02/21 17:48, , 13F
02/21 17:48, 13F
→
02/21 17:49, , 14F
02/21 17:49, 14F
→
02/21 17:51, , 15F
02/21 17:51, 15F
→
02/21 19:06, , 16F
02/21 19:06, 16F
→
02/21 19:06, , 17F
02/21 19:06, 17F
→
02/21 19:07, , 18F
02/21 19:07, 18F
→
02/24 20:51, , 19F
02/24 20:51, 19F
→
07/02 19:04,
5年前
, 20F
07/02 19:04, 20F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):