[P2G ] 請教關於兩套配裝問題
剛剛上XLINK打超金獅(需破角)
我穿的裝備技能有 屬性攻擊強化、斬味+1、業物
拿雙影劍G。
隊友A他穿的是 劍聖頭+麒麟裝+雙影劍G
技能有 跑者、精靈加護、屬性攻擊強化、心眼、砥石使用高速化
大致對話如下↓
隊友A:你的配裝怪怪的耶,看一下我的。
我:哪裡怪@@"
隊友A:業物不如砥石使用高速化,等於沒有,所以你的技能只剩兩招,技能太少了
應該是你自己配的吧?我這套萬用裝就還不錯用。
我想請問板上各位強者,屬攻強化、斬味+1、業物
真的有這麼一文不值嗎?
我的想法是,團戰的話,就穿一些能提升傷害輸出的裝
反正幾乎都是把魔物固定起來打居多
而劍聖+麒麟這套萬用裝單P就非常好用,因為有些是生存技能
這根本是兩套取向不同的裝,被說成"怪怪的".."技能好少"
我問他打金獅幹嘛配心眼,他說後腳有時候會彈刀
(可是不是要破角嗎?)
當然以外觀的話絕對是麒麟裝取勝啦!!
想聽聽各位的意見
說不定我的觀念是錯的Orz
<(_ _)>謝謝收看
--
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ 刺槍術! ▂▅▅
▄▄▄▄● ▄▄▄▄▄ 氣刀體一致! █ 你還有365塊肥皂沒撿!
▌▄▄ ▌ ▌ ▄▄▄▄▄ 一,二,殺~ ▃▃ ▲ 強制登入
▌▄▄ ◢◤ ▄▄▄▄ ◢█◣ ◢▄█ █ █ █ ◢▄█ █▄▄ 無法登出
▌▄▄ ◤▼ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ █ █ █ ◢ ▼ █ █ █ █▅▅ 終身免費
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ◥█◤ █ █ ◥◣▄ █ █ █ █▄▄ ψaappjj
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.165.139.102
推
10/31 14:31, , 1F
10/31 14:31, 1F
→
10/31 14:34, , 2F
10/31 14:34, 2F
→
10/31 14:36, , 3F
10/31 14:36, 3F
推
10/31 14:37, , 4F
10/31 14:37, 4F
→
10/31 14:38, , 5F
10/31 14:38, 5F
推
10/31 14:42, , 6F
10/31 14:42, 6F
→
10/31 14:43, , 7F
10/31 14:43, 7F
→
10/31 14:44, , 8F
10/31 14:44, 8F
→
10/31 14:44, , 9F
10/31 14:44, 9F
推
10/31 14:45, , 10F
10/31 14:45, 10F
→
10/31 14:45, , 11F
10/31 14:45, 11F
→
10/31 14:45, , 12F
10/31 14:45, 12F
→
10/31 14:46, , 13F
10/31 14:46, 13F
推
10/31 15:36, , 14F
10/31 15:36, 14F
→
10/31 15:37, , 15F
10/31 15:37, 15F
→
10/31 15:37, , 16F
10/31 15:37, 16F
推
10/31 15:38, , 17F
10/31 15:38, 17F
→
10/31 15:39, , 18F
10/31 15:39, 18F
→
10/31 15:39, , 19F
10/31 15:39, 19F
→
10/31 15:41, , 20F
10/31 15:41, 20F
→
10/31 15:41, , 21F
10/31 15:41, 21F
推
10/31 15:41, , 22F
10/31 15:41, 22F
→
10/31 15:43, , 23F
10/31 15:43, 23F
→
10/31 15:50, , 24F
10/31 15:50, 24F
→
10/31 15:50, , 25F
10/31 15:50, 25F
推
10/31 15:51, , 26F
10/31 15:51, 26F
推
10/31 15:52, , 27F
10/31 15:52, 27F
→
10/31 15:54, , 28F
10/31 15:54, 28F
推
10/31 15:54, , 29F
10/31 15:54, 29F
→
10/31 15:55, , 30F
10/31 15:55, 30F
→
10/31 15:56, , 31F
10/31 15:56, 31F
→
10/31 15:56, , 32F
10/31 15:56, 32F
推
10/31 16:10, , 33F
10/31 16:10, 33F
→
10/31 16:11, , 34F
10/31 16:11, 34F
→
10/31 16:12, , 35F
10/31 16:12, 35F
推
10/31 16:18, , 36F
10/31 16:18, 36F
推
10/31 16:20, , 37F
10/31 16:20, 37F
→
10/31 16:21, , 38F
10/31 16:21, 38F
推
10/31 16:24, , 39F
10/31 16:24, 39F
推
10/31 16:25, , 40F
10/31 16:25, 40F
推
10/31 16:26, , 41F
10/31 16:26, 41F
推
10/31 16:27, , 42F
10/31 16:27, 42F
推
10/31 16:35, , 43F
10/31 16:35, 43F
→
10/31 16:36, , 44F
10/31 16:36, 44F
→
10/31 16:36, , 45F
10/31 16:36, 45F
推
10/31 16:38, , 46F
10/31 16:38, 46F
→
10/31 16:38, , 47F
10/31 16:38, 47F
推
10/31 16:40, , 48F
10/31 16:40, 48F
推
10/31 16:43, , 49F
10/31 16:43, 49F
推
10/31 16:44, , 50F
10/31 16:44, 50F
推
10/31 16:50, , 51F
10/31 16:50, 51F
→
10/31 16:50, , 52F
10/31 16:50, 52F
→
10/31 16:57, , 53F
10/31 16:57, 53F
→
10/31 16:57, , 54F
10/31 16:57, 54F
推
10/31 17:03, , 55F
10/31 17:03, 55F
推
10/31 17:05, , 56F
10/31 17:05, 56F
推
10/31 18:55, , 57F
10/31 18:55, 57F
→
10/31 19:08, , 58F
10/31 19:08, 58F
→
10/31 19:08, , 59F
10/31 19:08, 59F
→
10/31 19:09, , 60F
10/31 19:09, 60F
推
10/31 19:22, , 61F
10/31 19:22, 61F
→
10/31 19:23, , 62F
10/31 19:23, 62F
→
10/31 19:23, , 63F
10/31 19:23, 63F
推
10/31 19:26, , 64F
10/31 19:26, 64F
→
10/31 19:27, , 65F
10/31 19:27, 65F
→
10/31 19:31, , 66F
10/31 19:31, 66F
→
10/31 19:32, , 67F
10/31 19:32, 67F
→
10/31 23:35, , 68F
10/31 23:35, 68F
推
11/01 00:05, , 69F
11/01 00:05, 69F
→
11/01 00:18, , 70F
11/01 00:18, 70F
→
11/01 00:23, , 71F
11/01 00:23, 71F
→
11/01 00:24, , 72F
11/01 00:24, 72F
推
11/01 00:31, , 73F
11/01 00:31, 73F
→
11/01 00:32, , 74F
11/01 00:32, 74F
推
11/01 00:33, , 75F
11/01 00:33, 75F
→
11/01 00:44, , 76F
11/01 00:44, 76F
推
11/01 01:13, , 77F
11/01 01:13, 77F
→
11/01 01:14, , 78F
11/01 01:14, 78F
→
11/01 01:43, , 79F
11/01 01:43, 79F
→
11/01 01:46, , 80F
11/01 01:46, 80F
推
11/01 09:03, , 81F
11/01 09:03, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):