[閒聊] Maple真的有比Bjergsen強嗎
Maple跟比爾森論純中路真的都是頂尖的
比爾森玩中路就是秀味十足,媽寶則是求穩的感覺(有點需要順風才敢兇)
會戰來說BJ比Maple有用太多了,很敢打很強勢,Maple則是一直在等對方失誤,但往往等
到自己隊友先犯二
Maple真的算不上一線,但則是強過同在二線西門的,不知道大家對於兩個看法如何?
PS補充 這邊說媽寶算是遊走在一線與二線中間,簡單說二線頂端,上不了一,有點像現
在NBA的Rajon Rondo
閃電狼強過TSM是事實,但只論中路答案很明顯的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.127.232
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1494811498.A.E1F.html
→
05/15 09:25, , 1F
05/15 09:25, 1F
推
05/15 09:25, , 2F
05/15 09:25, 2F
推
05/15 09:25, , 3F
05/15 09:25, 3F
→
05/15 09:25, , 4F
05/15 09:25, 4F
推
05/15 09:25, , 5F
05/15 09:25, 5F
推
05/15 09:25, , 6F
05/15 09:25, 6F
推
05/15 09:25, , 7F
05/15 09:25, 7F
推
05/15 09:25, , 8F
05/15 09:25, 8F
推
05/15 09:25, , 9F
05/15 09:25, 9F
推
05/15 09:25, , 10F
05/15 09:25, 10F
推
05/15 09:25, , 11F
05/15 09:25, 11F
→
05/15 09:25, , 12F
05/15 09:25, 12F
→
05/15 09:25, , 13F
05/15 09:25, 13F
推
05/15 09:25, , 14F
05/15 09:25, 14F
→
05/15 09:25, , 15F
05/15 09:25, 15F
→
05/15 09:25, , 16F
05/15 09:25, 16F
→
05/15 09:25, , 17F
05/15 09:25, 17F
推
05/15 09:25, , 18F
05/15 09:25, 18F
推
05/15 09:26, , 19F
05/15 09:26, 19F
推
05/15 09:26, , 20F
05/15 09:26, 20F
推
05/15 09:26, , 21F
05/15 09:26, 21F
推
05/15 09:26, , 22F
05/15 09:26, 22F
→
05/15 09:26, , 23F
05/15 09:26, 23F
推
05/15 09:26, , 24F
05/15 09:26, 24F
推
05/15 09:26, , 25F
05/15 09:26, 25F
推
05/15 09:26, , 26F
05/15 09:26, 26F
噓
05/15 09:26, , 27F
05/15 09:26, 27F
推
05/15 09:26, , 28F
05/15 09:26, 28F
推
05/15 09:26, , 29F
05/15 09:26, 29F
推
05/15 09:26, , 30F
05/15 09:26, 30F
噓
05/15 09:26, , 31F
05/15 09:26, 31F
推
05/15 09:26, , 32F
05/15 09:26, 32F
噓
05/15 09:26, , 33F
05/15 09:26, 33F
推
05/15 09:26, , 34F
05/15 09:26, 34F
推
05/15 09:26, , 35F
05/15 09:26, 35F
噓
05/15 09:26, , 36F
05/15 09:26, 36F
噓
05/15 09:27, , 37F
05/15 09:27, 37F
推
05/15 09:27, , 38F
05/15 09:27, 38F
推
05/15 09:27, , 39F
05/15 09:27, 39F
還有 116 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
05/15 09:52, , 156F
05/15 09:52, 156F
推
05/15 09:52, , 157F
05/15 09:52, 157F
→
05/15 09:52, , 158F
05/15 09:52, 158F
→
05/15 09:53, , 159F
05/15 09:53, 159F
→
05/15 09:53, , 160F
05/15 09:53, 160F
噓
05/15 09:53, , 161F
05/15 09:53, 161F
→
05/15 09:54, , 162F
05/15 09:54, 162F
推
05/15 09:54, , 163F
05/15 09:54, 163F
推
05/15 09:57, , 164F
05/15 09:57, 164F
推
05/15 10:02, , 165F
05/15 10:02, 165F
推
05/15 10:02, , 166F
05/15 10:02, 166F
→
05/15 10:03, , 167F
05/15 10:03, 167F
推
05/15 10:15, , 168F
05/15 10:15, 168F
→
05/15 10:15, , 169F
05/15 10:15, 169F
推
05/15 10:16, , 170F
05/15 10:16, 170F
→
05/15 10:17, , 171F
05/15 10:17, 171F
噓
05/15 10:32, , 172F
05/15 10:32, 172F
推
05/15 10:36, , 173F
05/15 10:36, 173F
推
05/15 10:55, , 174F
05/15 10:55, 174F
噓
05/15 11:01, , 175F
05/15 11:01, 175F
推
05/15 11:02, , 176F
05/15 11:02, 176F
噓
05/15 11:03, , 177F
05/15 11:03, 177F
→
05/15 11:03, , 178F
05/15 11:03, 178F
噓
05/15 11:39, , 179F
05/15 11:39, 179F
→
05/15 11:43, , 180F
05/15 11:43, 180F
噓
05/15 11:46, , 181F
05/15 11:46, 181F
推
05/15 12:04, , 182F
05/15 12:04, 182F
噓
05/15 12:38, , 183F
05/15 12:38, 183F
推
05/15 12:39, , 184F
05/15 12:39, 184F
推
05/15 12:40, , 185F
05/15 12:40, 185F
推
05/15 12:50, , 186F
05/15 12:50, 186F
→
05/15 13:33, , 187F
05/15 13:33, 187F
推
05/15 13:39, , 188F
05/15 13:39, 188F
噓
05/15 14:41, , 189F
05/15 14:41, 189F
噓
05/15 14:51, , 190F
05/15 14:51, 190F
推
05/15 15:37, , 191F
05/15 15:37, 191F
噓
05/15 15:38, , 192F
05/15 15:38, 192F
噓
05/15 16:14, , 193F
05/15 16:14, 193F
→
05/15 16:15, , 194F
05/15 16:15, 194F
推
05/15 17:33, , 195F
05/15 17:33, 195F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):