[閒聊] LOL設計可以吃手吃腳的英雄的可行性?
最近新角跟調查兵團領便當的團長名字一樣
現在的處境也跟團長差不多
選下去就通常等著GG
有部分是操作者的問題
有部分是隊友無法配合
感覺目前只有獅子跟埃爾文的向性比較合
就結果論來說,目前埃爾文的設計有點失敗
也有可能是RIOT設計英雄的靈感目前陷入瓶頸
如果R社設計一個英雄可以吃手吃腳
概念有點像菲歐拉的破綻
該英雄(假設為C)可以選定敵方一個英雄
被選定後,該敵方英雄會隨機出現四肢和頭的圖示
而C就可以藉由普攻,去取得四肢或豆頁
取完其中一個,一秒後出現另外一個
如果五體都取得,則C攻速和穿透暴增
可以搭配其他技能或是隊友助攻擊殺該敵方英雄
而且被動可以設計在草叢或是野區有坦度加成
讓這支英雄可以走上走JG
講到這裡,大家或許覺得這英雄太無腦
但是要攻速和穿透暴增,也要取得對方的五體
所以普攻要打五下
要夠勇敢的召喚師才辦得到
因為這英雄有點嗜血,所以選擇野獸比較有感
就像雷葛爾是獅子人一樣殘暴
私以為大金剛大猩猩(Chimpanzee)最符合這種形象
不知道這種今天要吃手,明天要吃腳的大金剛
設計出來有沒有搞頭呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.137.238
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1477204540.A.E06.html
推
10/23 14:36, , 1F
10/23 14:36, 1F
推
10/23 14:36, , 2F
10/23 14:36, 2F
推
10/23 14:36, , 3F
10/23 14:36, 3F
推
10/23 14:36, , 4F
10/23 14:36, 4F
推
10/23 14:37, , 5F
10/23 14:37, 5F
→
10/23 14:37, , 6F
10/23 14:37, 6F
推
10/23 14:37, , 7F
10/23 14:37, 7F
推
10/23 14:37, , 8F
10/23 14:37, 8F
推
10/23 14:37, , 9F
10/23 14:37, 9F
推
10/23 14:37, , 10F
10/23 14:37, 10F
推
10/23 14:37, , 11F
10/23 14:37, 11F
推
10/23 14:37, , 12F
10/23 14:37, 12F
推
10/23 14:38, , 13F
10/23 14:38, 13F
推
10/23 14:38, , 14F
10/23 14:38, 14F
推
10/23 14:38, , 15F
10/23 14:38, 15F
※ 編輯: s860418 (1.160.137.238), 10/23/2016 14:40:44
推
10/23 14:39, , 16F
10/23 14:39, 16F
推
10/23 14:39, , 17F
10/23 14:39, 17F
推
10/23 14:39, , 18F
10/23 14:39, 18F
推
10/23 14:39, , 19F
10/23 14:39, 19F
推
10/23 14:39, , 20F
10/23 14:39, 20F
推
10/23 14:40, , 21F
10/23 14:40, 21F
推
10/23 14:40, , 22F
10/23 14:40, 22F
推
10/23 14:40, , 23F
10/23 14:40, 23F
→
10/23 14:41, , 24F
10/23 14:41, 24F
推
10/23 14:42, , 25F
10/23 14:42, 25F
推
10/23 14:43, , 26F
10/23 14:43, 26F
推
10/23 14:44, , 27F
10/23 14:44, 27F
推
10/23 14:44, , 28F
10/23 14:44, 28F
推
10/23 14:44, , 29F
10/23 14:44, 29F
推
10/23 14:45, , 30F
10/23 14:45, 30F
→
10/23 14:45, , 31F
10/23 14:45, 31F
→
10/23 14:45, , 32F
10/23 14:45, 32F
噓
10/23 14:46, , 33F
10/23 14:46, 33F
推
10/23 14:46, , 34F
10/23 14:46, 34F
推
10/23 14:52, , 35F
10/23 14:52, 35F
推
10/23 14:52, , 36F
10/23 14:52, 36F
推
10/23 14:52, , 37F
10/23 14:52, 37F
推
10/23 14:53, , 38F
10/23 14:53, 38F
噓
10/23 14:54, , 39F
10/23 14:54, 39F
噓
10/23 14:56, , 40F
10/23 14:56, 40F
推
10/23 14:56, , 41F
10/23 14:56, 41F
→
10/23 14:58, , 42F
10/23 14:58, 42F
→
10/23 15:00, , 43F
10/23 15:00, 43F
→
10/23 15:02, , 44F
10/23 15:02, 44F
推
10/23 15:05, , 45F
10/23 15:05, 45F
推
10/23 15:06, , 46F
10/23 15:06, 46F
→
10/23 15:11, , 47F
10/23 15:11, 47F
推
10/23 15:11, , 48F
10/23 15:11, 48F
→
10/23 15:15, , 49F
10/23 15:15, 49F
推
10/23 15:15, , 50F
10/23 15:15, 50F
推
10/23 15:15, , 51F
10/23 15:15, 51F
推
10/23 15:15, , 52F
10/23 15:15, 52F
推
10/23 15:17, , 53F
10/23 15:17, 53F
推
10/23 15:19, , 54F
10/23 15:19, 54F
→
10/23 15:20, , 55F
10/23 15:20, 55F
推
10/23 15:21, , 56F
10/23 15:21, 56F
推
10/23 15:21, , 57F
10/23 15:21, 57F
推
10/23 15:21, , 58F
10/23 15:21, 58F
噓
10/23 15:21, , 59F
10/23 15:21, 59F
→
10/23 15:21, , 60F
10/23 15:21, 60F
推
10/23 15:25, , 61F
10/23 15:25, 61F
推
10/23 15:26, , 62F
10/23 15:26, 62F
→
10/23 15:27, , 63F
10/23 15:27, 63F
推
10/23 15:27, , 64F
10/23 15:27, 64F
推
10/23 15:29, , 65F
10/23 15:29, 65F
→
10/23 15:30, , 66F
10/23 15:30, 66F
推
10/23 15:35, , 67F
10/23 15:35, 67F
噓
10/23 15:37, , 68F
10/23 15:37, 68F
→
10/23 15:41, , 69F
10/23 15:41, 69F
→
10/23 15:42, , 70F
10/23 15:42, 70F
→
10/23 15:46, , 71F
10/23 15:46, 71F
推
10/23 16:03, , 72F
10/23 16:03, 72F
推
10/23 16:25, , 73F
10/23 16:25, 73F
噓
10/23 16:25, , 74F
10/23 16:25, 74F
→
10/23 16:26, , 75F
10/23 16:26, 75F
推
10/23 16:28, , 76F
10/23 16:28, 76F
推
10/23 16:58, , 77F
10/23 16:58, 77F
→
10/23 17:58, , 78F
10/23 17:58, 78F
推
10/23 18:34, , 79F
10/23 18:34, 79F
推
10/23 18:55, , 80F
10/23 18:55, 80F
推
10/23 20:29, , 81F
10/23 20:29, 81F
→
10/23 20:31, , 82F
10/23 20:31, 82F
噓
10/23 20:46, , 83F
10/23 20:46, 83F
→
10/23 23:37, , 84F
10/23 23:37, 84F
推
10/24 00:15, , 85F
10/24 00:15, 85F