Re: [閒聊]X燒進來
※ 引述《fzman47 (a man)》之銘言:
: 給Maple凱瑞型法師好嗎? 馬爾,蛇女,勒布朗,維克特...明天有龍獸
: 不要再給卡薩雷克薩可以嗎?
: MMD不能選艾克,特朗德,波比嗎?
: 蛇蛇選個坦角這麼難嗎? 牛,布朗姆,貪肯奇,特朗德...
: 為什麼NL?最正常,選角比較正常啊
: 還有隊伍CC技那麼少,佔優下也打不了團,遊戲一直拖到大後期優勢都磨光了
: ROX都能出夜曲了...你還在META3曉
: 銅牌快氣到語無倫次了
告訴你啦 叉燒思維是不會改的
明天照樣這樣選啦 為什麼?
因為在他的思考裡面 他的陣容肯定是沒問題的
邏輯上來說 我選的陣容前期都能贏四五千 有什麼問題?
後期打輸那是選手自己玩到輸的 不是我B/P問題
這就是台大邏輯?懂??
他才不會考慮為什麼前期贏四五千 為什麼後面會被對面拖到後期
他才不會考慮MMD為什麼中期都會被打出破口導致遊戲一直往後拖
他才不會考慮MMD吶兒推牆亂推 0怒傳送
藍寶亂燒甚至不燒直接按金人導致團戰一直打不贏
他才不會想到要是MMD拿艾克無腦E上去黏人比賽可能直接領先到最後END GAME
這就是叉燒 懂??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.43.102.84
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1475385516.A.D70.html
推
10/02 13:19, , 1F
10/02 13:19, 1F
推
10/02 13:19, , 2F
10/02 13:19, 2F
→
10/02 13:19, , 3F
10/02 13:19, 3F
推
10/02 13:19, , 4F
10/02 13:19, 4F
推
10/02 13:19, , 5F
10/02 13:19, 5F
推
10/02 13:19, , 6F
10/02 13:19, 6F
噓
10/02 13:19, , 7F
10/02 13:19, 7F
噓
10/02 13:20, , 8F
10/02 13:20, 8F
推
10/02 13:20, , 9F
10/02 13:20, 9F
→
10/02 13:20, , 10F
10/02 13:20, 10F
推
10/02 13:20, , 11F
10/02 13:20, 11F
不 這篇是再說教練沒用 MMD拿這兩隻發揮哪一次好過
你選個艾克就可以把雪球直接滾到底 不會被滾回來
怕艾克前期輸CS?有差嗎 選這兩隻也是輸CS呀
推
10/02 13:20, , 12F
10/02 13:20, 12F
噓
10/02 13:20, , 13F
10/02 13:20, 13F
推
10/02 13:20, , 14F
10/02 13:20, 14F
推
10/02 13:20, , 15F
10/02 13:20, 15F
推
10/02 13:20, , 16F
10/02 13:20, 16F
→
10/02 13:20, , 17F
10/02 13:20, 17F
推
10/02 13:20, , 18F
10/02 13:20, 18F
噓
10/02 13:20, , 19F
10/02 13:20, 19F
推
10/02 13:21, , 20F
10/02 13:21, 20F
噓
10/02 13:21, , 21F
10/02 13:21, 21F
推
10/02 13:21, , 22F
10/02 13:21, 22F
噓
10/02 13:21, , 23F
10/02 13:21, 23F
→
10/02 13:21, , 24F
10/02 13:21, 24F
噓
10/02 13:21, , 25F
10/02 13:21, 25F
→
10/02 13:21, , 26F
10/02 13:21, 26F
推
10/02 13:21, , 27F
10/02 13:21, 27F
→
10/02 13:21, , 28F
10/02 13:21, 28F
→
10/02 13:21, , 29F
10/02 13:21, 29F
→
10/02 13:21, , 30F
10/02 13:21, 30F
噓
10/02 13:21, , 31F
10/02 13:21, 31F
※ 編輯: ADIE2 (115.43.102.84), 10/02/2016 13:24:45
→
10/02 13:22, , 32F
10/02 13:22, 32F
→
10/02 13:22, , 33F
10/02 13:22, 33F
噓
10/02 13:22, , 34F
10/02 13:22, 34F
推
10/02 13:22, , 35F
10/02 13:22, 35F
推
10/02 13:22, , 36F
10/02 13:22, 36F
→
10/02 13:23, , 37F
10/02 13:23, 37F
還有 145 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
10/02 13:49, , 183F
10/02 13:49, 183F
推
10/02 13:50, , 184F
10/02 13:50, 184F
→
10/02 13:50, , 185F
10/02 13:50, 185F
→
10/02 13:50, , 186F
10/02 13:50, 186F
推
10/02 13:52, , 187F
10/02 13:52, 187F
噓
10/02 13:53, , 188F
10/02 13:53, 188F
→
10/02 13:54, , 189F
10/02 13:54, 189F
噓
10/02 13:54, , 190F
10/02 13:54, 190F
推
10/02 13:55, , 191F
10/02 13:55, 191F
推
10/02 13:56, , 192F
10/02 13:56, 192F
推
10/02 13:57, , 193F
10/02 13:57, 193F
推
10/02 14:00, , 194F
10/02 14:00, 194F
推
10/02 14:12, , 195F
10/02 14:12, 195F
→
10/02 14:12, , 196F
10/02 14:12, 196F
噓
10/02 14:15, , 197F
10/02 14:15, 197F
噓
10/02 14:16, , 198F
10/02 14:16, 198F
→
10/02 14:17, , 199F
10/02 14:17, 199F
→
10/02 14:18, , 200F
10/02 14:18, 200F
→
10/02 14:19, , 201F
10/02 14:19, 201F
推
10/02 14:20, , 202F
10/02 14:20, 202F
→
10/02 14:21, , 203F
10/02 14:21, 203F
→
10/02 14:26, , 204F
10/02 14:26, 204F
噓
10/02 14:28, , 205F
10/02 14:28, 205F
→
10/02 14:35, , 206F
10/02 14:35, 206F
→
10/02 14:37, , 207F
10/02 14:37, 207F
噓
10/02 14:39, , 208F
10/02 14:39, 208F
噓
10/02 14:41, , 209F
10/02 14:41, 209F
推
10/02 14:56, , 210F
10/02 14:56, 210F
推
10/02 14:56, , 211F
10/02 14:56, 211F
→
10/02 14:56, , 212F
10/02 14:56, 212F
推
10/02 15:05, , 213F
10/02 15:05, 213F
噓
10/02 17:04, , 214F
10/02 17:04, 214F
推
10/02 17:42, , 215F
10/02 17:42, 215F
推
10/02 18:14, , 216F
10/02 18:14, 216F
→
10/02 18:14, , 217F
10/02 18:14, 217F
→
10/02 18:15, , 218F
10/02 18:15, 218F
噓
10/02 18:29, , 219F
10/02 18:29, 219F
推
10/02 19:10, , 220F
10/02 19:10, 220F
推
10/02 19:31, , 221F
10/02 19:31, 221F
→
10/02 19:31, , 222F
10/02 19:31, 222F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
閒聊
32
115
以下文章回應了本文:
閒聊
-2
15
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):
閒聊
32
115
閒聊
35
222
閒聊
-2
15
閒聊
7
21
閒聊
-14
38
閒聊
0
14