[問題] 為何國外賽評一致看雖lms?
早上邊上班邊看直播
看到差點跳起來歡呼
剛剛想說看個英文台聽國外賽評的播報
http://i.imgur.com/ZC7xNg3.jpg

我只記得他們說的大意
「雖然ahq夏季進步很多
但是h2k的光芒還是會蓋過他們」
「h2k是比較有天賦的選手」
「下路2對2的等級有差距」
「如果老山能拿出像李星的角色
或許可以一搏,但是...還是比不上 」
雖說我不是起q粉
但是他們代表lms 我就是支持力挺
但看到如此貶低真的很不是滋味
是因為優越感嗎這樣?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.247.143
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1475242897.A.40C.html
→
09/30 21:42, , 1F
09/30 21:42, 1F
推
09/30 21:42, , 2F
09/30 21:42, 2F
推
09/30 21:42, , 3F
09/30 21:42, 3F
噓
09/30 21:42, , 4F
09/30 21:42, 4F
推
09/30 21:42, , 5F
09/30 21:42, 5F
→
09/30 21:42, , 6F
09/30 21:42, 6F
推
09/30 21:43, , 7F
09/30 21:43, 7F

推
09/30 21:43, , 8F
09/30 21:43, 8F
是不會啦,能打進世界賽應該也沒有多弱
推
09/30 21:43, , 9F
09/30 21:43, 9F
推
09/30 21:43, , 10F
09/30 21:43, 10F
這看完了,賽評真的說他們可能狀況不好,他們覺得很失望
推
09/30 21:43, , 11F
09/30 21:43, 11F
→
09/30 21:43, , 12F
09/30 21:43, 12F
→
09/30 21:44, , 13F
09/30 21:44, 13F
推
09/30 21:44, , 14F
09/30 21:44, 14F
推
09/30 21:44, , 15F
09/30 21:44, 15F
推
09/30 21:45, , 16F
09/30 21:45, 16F
推
09/30 21:45, , 17F
09/30 21:45, 17F
推
09/30 21:45, , 18F
09/30 21:45, 18F
→
09/30 21:45, , 19F
09/30 21:45, 19F
推
09/30 21:45, , 20F
09/30 21:45, 20F
推
09/30 21:45, , 21F
09/30 21:45, 21F
推
09/30 21:46, , 22F
09/30 21:46, 22F
推
09/30 21:46, , 23F
09/30 21:46, 23F
最後一個 TSM 對 RNG 真的很瞎
明明就55開,可是4個都說 TSM 穩贏,瞎扯蛋
→
09/30 21:46, , 24F
09/30 21:46, 24F
推
09/30 21:47, , 25F
09/30 21:47, 25F
推
09/30 21:47, , 26F
09/30 21:47, 26F
推
09/30 21:47, , 27F
09/30 21:47, 27F
→
09/30 21:47, , 28F
09/30 21:47, 28F
推
09/30 21:47, , 29F
09/30 21:47, 29F
推
09/30 21:48, , 30F
09/30 21:48, 30F
推
09/30 21:48, , 31F
09/30 21:48, 31F
推
09/30 21:48, , 32F
09/30 21:48, 32F
噓
09/30 21:48, , 33F
09/30 21:48, 33F
→
09/30 21:48, , 34F
09/30 21:48, 34F
推
09/30 21:48, , 35F
09/30 21:48, 35F
→
09/30 21:48, , 36F
09/30 21:48, 36F
還有 73 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
09/30 22:54, , 110F
09/30 22:54, 110F
噓
09/30 23:00, , 111F
09/30 23:00, 111F
→
09/30 23:00, , 112F
09/30 23:00, 112F
→
09/30 23:03, , 113F
09/30 23:03, 113F
推
09/30 23:05, , 114F
09/30 23:05, 114F
推
09/30 23:07, , 115F
09/30 23:07, 115F
推
09/30 23:11, , 116F
09/30 23:11, 116F
推
09/30 23:19, , 117F
09/30 23:19, 117F
→
09/30 23:20, , 118F
09/30 23:20, 118F
推
09/30 23:24, , 119F
09/30 23:24, 119F
噓
09/30 23:25, , 120F
09/30 23:25, 120F
→
09/30 23:25, , 121F
09/30 23:25, 121F
推
09/30 23:27, , 122F
09/30 23:27, 122F
推
09/30 23:30, , 123F
09/30 23:30, 123F
→
09/30 23:30, , 124F
09/30 23:30, 124F
→
09/30 23:31, , 125F
09/30 23:31, 125F
→
09/30 23:31, , 126F
09/30 23:31, 126F
→
09/30 23:37, , 127F
09/30 23:37, 127F
推
09/30 23:38, , 128F
09/30 23:38, 128F
→
09/30 23:39, , 129F
09/30 23:39, 129F
推
09/30 23:40, , 130F
09/30 23:40, 130F

噓
09/30 23:42, , 131F
09/30 23:42, 131F
噓
09/30 23:43, , 132F
09/30 23:43, 132F
推
09/30 23:44, , 133F
09/30 23:44, 133F
推
09/30 23:44, , 134F
09/30 23:44, 134F
→
09/30 23:45, , 135F
09/30 23:45, 135F
→
09/30 23:45, , 136F
09/30 23:45, 136F
→
09/30 23:47, , 137F
09/30 23:47, 137F
→
09/30 23:47, , 138F
09/30 23:47, 138F
推
09/30 23:53, , 139F
09/30 23:53, 139F
推
09/30 23:53, , 140F
09/30 23:53, 140F
→
09/30 23:55, , 141F
09/30 23:55, 141F
推
10/01 00:06, , 142F
10/01 00:06, 142F
推
10/01 00:38, , 143F
10/01 00:38, 143F
→
10/01 00:38, , 144F
10/01 00:38, 144F
噓
10/01 00:56, , 145F
10/01 00:56, 145F
→
10/01 00:56, , 146F
10/01 00:56, 146F
推
10/01 01:00, , 147F
10/01 01:00, 147F
推
10/01 01:04, , 148F
10/01 01:04, 148F
推
10/01 02:02, , 149F
10/01 02:02, 149F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):