Re: [閒聊] M17有辦法複製FW勝利方程式嗎
以今天來說是不可能
以我個人觀點來看
M17如果能把戰術搭配執行的徹底
也不用複製什麼的,自己就會有一套打AHQ的方法了
今天的表現讓人驚艷,但也捏了把冷汗
就是M17將遊戲結束的能力可以說是相當低落
這可不是睡一覺就能長回來的東西,而是必須經過訓練的
M17用很漂亮的方式直接封死了JT的運作
以比賽內容來說JT本應是會被當成豬肉鞭打的
但是還是搞到了第五場
代表M17確實有了一個致勝的手段,不論是頭腦、戰術、技術
這種針對式的打法在BO賽中是很有利的
因為你不但有一個直接的團隊收益,還能給對手更大的壓力
我先假設M17在明天也會有一套邏輯來處理AHQ
但就算執行效率跟今天一樣好
也沒辦法真正勝過AHQ
因為AHQ不是不善應對緊急狀況的隊伍,應該說他們很擅長應對
雖然AHQ的戰術執行跟團隊搭配沒有像閃電狼這麼突出
但是個人能力和會戰能力就是AHQ能在聯賽坐穩的原因
你要打出破口,總不能不看對線對手是誰吧?雖然JT個人能力也很好
但是你今天收尾搞的一團亂,總不能不看明天對手有多會打會戰吧?
光以這點來說M17輸面就大了
但比賽好玩的地方就是這裡
萬一M17真的有辦法搞得AHQ前期也運作不良
然後呈現一個互爆的狀況
那不論是對兩方還是觀眾,將又是一場體力的對決了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.11.224
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1472923805.A.7A0.html
推
09/04 01:31, , 1F
09/04 01:31, 1F
推
09/04 01:33, , 2F
09/04 01:33, 2F
→
09/04 01:33, , 3F
09/04 01:33, 3F
→
09/04 01:34, , 4F
09/04 01:34, 4F
要我說的話AHQ對當時版本的掌握反而比FW還好
能成功反打的原因就是團隊配合跟戰術執行相當相當徹底且精湛的關係
幸運之類的從來都不會是贏或輸的原因
要說的話,能引發幸運的要素追根究柢還是團隊實力
推
09/04 01:35, , 5F
09/04 01:35, 5F
推
09/04 01:35, , 6F
09/04 01:35, 6F
→
09/04 01:35, , 7F
09/04 01:35, 7F
→
09/04 01:36, , 8F
09/04 01:36, 8F
※ 編輯: ray48 (1.164.11.224), 09/04/2016 01:41:07
推
09/04 01:39, , 9F
09/04 01:39, 9F
推
09/04 01:40, , 10F
09/04 01:40, 10F
噓
09/04 01:41, , 11F
09/04 01:41, 11F
推
09/04 01:42, , 12F
09/04 01:42, 12F
推
09/04 01:42, , 13F
09/04 01:42, 13F
→
09/04 01:43, , 14F
09/04 01:43, 14F
→
09/04 01:46, , 15F
09/04 01:46, 15F
推
09/04 01:47, , 16F
09/04 01:47, 16F
推
09/04 01:48, , 17F
09/04 01:48, 17F
推
09/04 01:48, , 18F
09/04 01:48, 18F
推
09/04 01:50, , 19F
09/04 01:50, 19F
→
09/04 01:51, , 20F
09/04 01:51, 20F
→
09/04 01:51, , 21F
09/04 01:51, 21F
→
09/04 01:52, , 22F
09/04 01:52, 22F
→
09/04 01:52, , 23F
09/04 01:52, 23F
→
09/04 01:53, , 24F
09/04 01:53, 24F
→
09/04 01:53, , 25F
09/04 01:53, 25F
→
09/04 01:56, , 26F
09/04 01:56, 26F
推
09/04 01:56, , 27F
09/04 01:56, 27F
噓
09/04 02:03, , 28F
09/04 02:03, 28F
推
09/04 02:05, , 29F
09/04 02:05, 29F
推
09/04 02:07, , 30F
09/04 02:07, 30F
推
09/04 02:08, , 31F
09/04 02:08, 31F
→
09/04 02:08, , 32F
09/04 02:08, 32F
推
09/04 02:10, , 33F
09/04 02:10, 33F
推
09/04 02:13, , 34F
09/04 02:13, 34F
噓
09/04 02:13, , 35F
09/04 02:13, 35F
推
09/04 02:16, , 36F
09/04 02:16, 36F
噓
09/04 02:16, , 37F
09/04 02:16, 37F
推
09/04 02:16, , 38F
09/04 02:16, 38F
→
09/04 02:16, , 39F
09/04 02:16, 39F
→
09/04 02:20, , 40F
09/04 02:20, 40F
噓
09/04 02:27, , 41F
09/04 02:27, 41F
推
09/04 02:32, , 42F
09/04 02:32, 42F
推
09/04 02:34, , 43F
09/04 02:34, 43F
→
09/04 02:34, , 44F
09/04 02:34, 44F
→
09/04 02:35, , 45F
09/04 02:35, 45F
噓
09/04 02:43, , 46F
09/04 02:43, 46F
噓
09/04 03:04, , 47F
09/04 03:04, 47F
噓
09/04 03:04, , 48F
09/04 03:04, 48F
噓
09/04 07:17, , 49F
09/04 07:17, 49F
噓
09/04 07:51, , 50F
09/04 07:51, 50F
→
09/04 09:27, , 51F
09/04 09:27, 51F
噓
09/04 09:33, , 52F
09/04 09:33, 52F
噓
09/04 09:59, , 53F
09/04 09:59, 53F
推
09/04 12:14, , 54F
09/04 12:14, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):