[閒聊] Riot當初應該重製路西恩而不是葛雷夫
一陣子沒玩LOL了
聽說路西恩最近超強
好像是因為裝備的關係
現在被Riot瘋狂nerf
看來是想把他砍回冰箱
現在想想還是很X 為何當時重製的是葛雷夫
而不是路西恩 葛雷夫是學長啊
再者 路西恩平衡難度高於舊版葛雷夫太多了
兼具持續輸出 高機動性 清兵快 又有爆發
一次可以取代葛雷夫和EZ
而且我覺得路西恩實在沒什麼特色
舊版葛雷夫好玩多了
所以當初Riot該重製的是路西恩
而不是葛雷夫
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.234.22.191
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1464946522.A.D2A.html
推
06/03 17:37, , 1F
06/03 17:37, 1F
噓
06/03 17:37, , 2F
06/03 17:37, 2F
路西恩那叫nerf吧 而且是從550→500
※ 編輯: AlLeN0121 (36.234.22.191), 06/03/2016 17:38:48
→
06/03 17:39, , 3F
06/03 17:39, 3F
噓
06/03 17:40, , 4F
06/03 17:40, 4F
推
06/03 17:40, , 5F
06/03 17:40, 5F
我是說機動性同樣都很高 但黑人輸出高太多
※ 編輯: AlLeN0121 (36.234.22.191), 06/03/2016 17:41:28
→
06/03 17:44, , 6F
06/03 17:44, 6F
推
06/03 17:49, , 7F
06/03 17:49, 7F
推
06/03 17:53, , 8F
06/03 17:53, 8F
→
06/03 17:53, , 9F
06/03 17:53, 9F
推
06/03 17:58, , 10F
06/03 17:58, 10F
噓
06/03 18:02, , 11F
06/03 18:02, 11F
推
06/03 18:04, , 12F
06/03 18:04, 12F
推
06/03 18:04, , 13F
06/03 18:04, 13F
推
06/03 18:05, , 14F
06/03 18:05, 14F
推
06/03 18:12, , 15F
06/03 18:12, 15F
推
06/03 18:16, , 16F
06/03 18:16, 16F
推
06/03 18:17, , 17F
06/03 18:17, 17F
推
06/03 18:19, , 18F
06/03 18:19, 18F
推
06/03 18:21, , 19F
06/03 18:21, 19F
推
06/03 18:24, , 20F
06/03 18:24, 20F
噓
06/03 18:30, , 21F
06/03 18:30, 21F
→
06/03 18:34, , 22F
06/03 18:34, 22F
推
06/03 18:36, , 23F
06/03 18:36, 23F
→
06/03 18:46, , 24F
06/03 18:46, 24F
→
06/03 18:46, , 25F
06/03 18:46, 25F
→
06/03 18:52, , 26F
06/03 18:52, 26F
推
06/03 18:55, , 27F
06/03 18:55, 27F
推
06/03 18:58, , 28F
06/03 18:58, 28F
→
06/03 18:58, , 29F
06/03 18:58, 29F
推
06/03 19:16, , 30F
06/03 19:16, 30F
推
06/03 19:19, , 31F
06/03 19:19, 31F
→
06/03 19:31, , 32F
06/03 19:31, 32F
→
06/03 19:32, , 33F
06/03 19:32, 33F
推
06/03 19:32, , 34F
06/03 19:32, 34F
→
06/03 19:34, , 35F
06/03 19:34, 35F
→
06/03 19:34, , 36F
06/03 19:34, 36F
推
06/03 19:49, , 37F
06/03 19:49, 37F
推
06/03 19:52, , 38F
06/03 19:52, 38F
→
06/03 19:52, , 39F
06/03 19:52, 39F
推
06/03 19:54, , 40F
06/03 19:54, 40F
推
06/03 20:08, , 41F
06/03 20:08, 41F
噓
06/03 20:14, , 42F
06/03 20:14, 42F
噓
06/03 20:15, , 43F
06/03 20:15, 43F
推
06/03 20:25, , 44F
06/03 20:25, 44F
噓
06/03 20:39, , 45F
06/03 20:39, 45F
→
06/03 20:39, , 46F
06/03 20:39, 46F
推
06/03 20:40, , 47F
06/03 20:40, 47F
推
06/03 20:43, , 48F
06/03 20:43, 48F
推
06/03 20:46, , 49F
06/03 20:46, 49F
→
06/03 21:09, , 50F
06/03 21:09, 50F
→
06/03 21:17, , 51F
06/03 21:17, 51F
噓
06/03 21:36, , 52F
06/03 21:36, 52F
→
06/03 21:45, , 53F
06/03 21:45, 53F
推
06/03 22:52, , 54F
06/03 22:52, 54F
→
06/03 22:53, , 55F
06/03 22:53, 55F
→
06/03 22:55, , 56F
06/03 22:55, 56F
推
06/04 00:41, , 57F
06/04 00:41, 57F
推
06/04 00:50, , 58F
06/04 00:50, 58F
推
06/04 07:59, , 59F
06/04 07:59, 59F
→
06/04 08:00, , 60F
06/04 08:00, 60F
→
06/04 08:01, , 61F
06/04 08:01, 61F
推
06/04 08:56, , 62F
06/04 08:56, 62F
推
06/04 11:02, , 63F
06/04 11:02, 63F
噓
06/04 13:03, , 64F
06/04 13:03, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):