[外絮] Reddit - CloudTemplar對於抽籤結果看法
原文奉上:https://goo.gl/lzSo8f
[Korea]
Expectation before Worlds: 9/10
Performance up to now: 10/10
First I will talk about Korea. It's not because I'm Korean but Korea has
shown overwhelming performances over the years and that is why I expected
them do to well even though there were some worrying signs.
Earlier in the season IEM and MSI were both won by non-Korean teams. Also,
a lot of top players went overseas before the season making be only give 9
stars our of 10 for expectation.
But all 3 teams made it past groups with clean performances and SKT looked
invincible.
韓國賽區:
賽前期待指數:9/10
目前表現指數:10/10
我先探討韓國不是因為我是韓國人,而是這幾年韓國的表現實在非常出色
而這也是我期待甚高的原因,即便一開始有些值得擔憂的預兆
早些的 IEM 跟 MSI 都是由非韓隊伍奪冠,而且許多國內頂尖玩家出走也是讓我
之所以期待僅止於給九分的原因,但是三支代表隊都以非常精彩的表現在小組賽裡
脫穎而出,更別提 SKT 現在看起來所向披靡。
SKT
Pros: I don't think this team needs any explanation. They are just strong.
Cons: Being too strong is also a bad thing. It just makes it awkward when
they lose.
SKT
優點:我不認為認定他們強需要任何解釋,啊就超強啊
缺點:太強(喂!)也是個缺點,就是輸的時候看起來會很尷尬
KT
Pros: Aggressiveness and sharp rotations.
Cons: Risks from being too aggressive and nervous laning phase.
KT
優點:侵略性與非常敏銳的輪轉調線
缺點:太侵略導致有些風險,而且對現也有點需要注意
KOO
Pros: Free-spirited Pick/Bans combined with their perfect plays.
Cons: Pick/Ban gamble makes them inconsistent.
KOO
優點:靈活的 Pick/Ban,而且選的陣容都能玩得非常優秀
缺點:賭博性質的 Pick/Ban 增加了隊伍的不確定性
[Europe]
Expectation before Worlds: 6/10
Performance up to now: 8/10
I knew that European teams had very good scrim results against Korean teams
and watching LCS made be think that a team like Fnatic could be a threat.
But it is not like the M5 days and I could not get rid of the thought that
it was only Europe. It is true that Europe has been underwhelming the past
years.
But I was surprised after watching their games. Europe with their fresh
picks, unique style and Origens performance was totally unexpected.
General xPeke's experience made me admire him.
歐洲賽區:
賽前期待指數:6/10
目前表現指數:8/10
歐洲隊伍與韓國隊伍之間的對決都互有往來,而且在看過 LCS 賽季之後讓我覺得
Fnatic 著實可能是個威脅
但現在已經不是 M5 那個年代了,歐洲就僅止於如此,歷年來一直沒有什麼特殊表現
即便如此今年的比賽還是讓我非常讚嘆,嶄新的選角策略與戰術還有 Origens 的表現
出乎我意料之外,尤其是 xPeke 的表現令我印象深刻
Fnatic
Pros: Aggressive skirmishes leading into amazing team fights. Balance between
the old and new is impressive.
Cons: Inconsistent from their risky play style.
Fnatic
優點:透過侵略性的小會戰取得後來的團戰優勢,新舊戰術與選角的平衡也非常好
缺點:風險性太高的遊戲風格
Origen
Pros: Slow-paced and perfect game management. Can't forget this teams backdoor.
Cons: Seems to have trouble when opponents play a fast-paced game.
Origen
優點:大後期的風格與遊戲理解,令人難以忘懷的偷拆
缺點:快步調的遊戲開局似乎是他們的罩門
[NA]
Expectation before Worlds: 4/10
Performance up to now: 2/10
This is a region that I personally under hype. Even though this is the place
where LOL started they haven't had any great performances.
After watching TSM win IEM I thought maybe NA is different this year. Also
watching CLG at LCS made me think that with these performances and players,
NA might be different than before.
So its true that I was expecting them to do well. But they were weird.
We couldn't see their strengths that they showed at LCS. C9 who played
better than expected and were set to get out of groups lost all of their
remained matches and ended up failing to make it out.
The decisive problem with NA is that none of their teams had good game
management which was disappointing.
As someone who started LoL in the NA server and became a pro-gamer by
learning a lot from NA pro players, watching NA performing poorly was sad
to watch.
Especially Dyrus to me and our team(MIG) was one of those players
that made us seem like we were against a brick wall and seeing him retire
was sad to see. I will cheer on for you. Fighting!.
北美賽區:(淘汰的區域打最多呵呵)
這個區域我個人不甚看好,即便這裏是 LoL 的發源地,他們從未有任何好表現
在看到 TSM 在 IEM 奪冠之後,我猜想北美今年是否已經有所蛻變
而且在看到 CLG 季賽表現後,我開始認為北美今年也許真的有所不同了
是的,我曾期待過他們有所展現,但他們的成果實在是很尷尬...
原本在 LCS 裡的那些強勢之處不見了,跌破大家眼鏡的 C9 差一步就要突破小組賽
但最後還是被打回原形失敗收場
令人失望的是,一直以來北美的癥結點都是所有隊伍對遊戲的理解都不夠
畢竟我也是看著北美這些職業玩家一路成長過來的,北美的表現讓我非常難過
尤其我們(MIG)還曾被 Dyrus 肆虐過,看他退休也令人不勝唏噓,天佑北美
優點:呃... LoL的發源地算嗎?
缺點:所有隊伍遊戲理解都很糟
[LMS]
Expectation before Worlds: 5/10
Performance up to now: 7/10
As you will know, LMS is a region that gives me a lot of different feelings.
The feeling I got after watching LMS was these guys hasn't changed. Their
unique style of aggressiveness early in the game and Westdoor's champion pool
was still the same.
I didn't know how this style of play will work at Worlds especially their weak
points being so obvious I could not predict how the game will play out.
But their games at Worlds was very fun to watch. Even though they didn't fix
their weak points, they focused on playing around their strong points and
didn't give their opponent time to rest with their aggressive game style and
eventually both teams made it out of groups.
Especially FW beating KOO showed how scary this team is when they focus on
their strengths.
Win or lose this region will always show up and attractive region.
台港澳戰區(來啦!):
賽前期待指數:5/10
目前表現指數:7/10
台港澳一直是個讓我感觸良多的賽區,看完 LMS 季賽後我的感想是:
「這些傢伙沒有改變」,獨特的早期侵略與西門的角色池依舊如此(中槍啦)
我不知道這個風格是否能夠奏效,尤其這些缺點實在太過明顯以至於我無法
想像這些遊戲的結果會如何
但他們的比賽實在是太有趣了,即便他們沒有改善弱點,他們完全發揮所長
並用侵略的風格讓對手沒有喘息空間,而且最終兩支隊伍都從小組賽中晉級了
尤其是閃電狼擊敗 KOO 的比賽完全展現了他們的可怕之處,無論輸贏與否,
這個賽區的比賽都有得瞧了
FW
Pros: Balance between champion pools, team fighting and game management
is good and scary when they get a comp they are confident with
(feels like an aggressive Korean team).
Cons: Very inconsistent and look weak when Pick/Bans or the game
don't go their way.
閃電狼
優點:當拿到他們有信心的組合時,角色池、團戰與遊戲理解的配合非常令人畏懼
缺點:不穩定,而且如果選角不如己意或是逆風的時候就喪失神力了
AHQ
Pros: Good at building their lead. Great split pushing game management.
Cons: Their opponents are SKT.
AHQ戰隊
優點:很會取得領先地位,分推與遊戲理解很出色
缺點:他們要打 SKT (呃...)
China
Expectation before Worlds: 8/10
Performance up to now: 4/10
( EDG isn't that bad but since it is an overall average)
This is a region that was expected to match up to the Koreans.
Even though they don't look as strong for a region that is expected to
match up to Korea, the movement of top Korean players to China expected a
shift of dominance.
WE who was bottom of the table in China surprised everyone with their
performance at IEM and EDG winning MSI showed China could now match up to
Korea. This was the reason why China was expected to do so well at Worlds.
I also have watched a lot of LPL and was amazed at how single players will
carry the team and their incredible team fighting made me think that this was
the only region that could be a threat to Korea.
But after watching them at Worlds gave me a shock equivalent to a car crash.
Though it is not over as EDG is still in it, the other 2 teams aggressiveness
play style only showed up after they were eliminated.
EDG, who were rated to be aggressive and have game management skills that
could match the Koreans, didn't perform as expected(though I understand
this as they were against SKT).
I don't know whether it was communication problems or mental problems but
Worlds is a place where you come to prove yourself and there should be no
excuses.
I still believe EDG is a team you should not take easily. I hope they
perform as expected in the higher rounds.
It still is shocking thinking back at it. The legendary LPL.
中國賽區
賽前期待指數:8/10
目前表現指數:4/10(EDG 沒這麼爛,這是平均而言)
這是大家期待與韓國抗衡的賽區,即便看起來實力似乎存疑,但之前韓國出走潮的影響
還是讓大家期待中國賽區能夠是爭取主宰地位
連墊底的 WE 戰隊在 IEM 都能令大家驚呆了,EDG 在 MSI 奪冠也展現這個賽區的潛力
也難怪各方都期待他們在世界大賽的表現
我也看了許多 LPL 比賽,許多單人carry的表現與精彩的團戰讓我認為他們是韓國
戰隊奪冠之路的唯一威脅,但真正上陣的中國在世界賽的表現實在是嚇得我褲子都掉了
雖然在 EDG 被淘汰前他們仍舊有希望,另外兩隊原有的侵略風格只有在確定被淘汰之後
才有點表現,EDG 的表現也不如我們所預期的強悍(畢竟他們面對SKT)
我不知道究竟是語言溝通上的問題還是心態調整,在世界大賽的戰場上不容許失敗藉口
我還是認為 EDG 是隻有奪冠實力的隊伍,我希望他們在後續賽程上表現更好,偉哉LPL
EDG
Pros: A good mix of Korean and Chinese strengths.
Cons: Their laning phase looks shaky. Especially their top lane makes me cry.
EDG戰隊
優點:混合中韓兩方的強處
缺點:抖抖的對線期,尤其是上路都快讓我落淚了
[WC]
Only time is the answer. If they want to reduce that time then a lot of
talented players will be needed.
外卡賽區
只有時間會告訴我們結果,想要縮短展露頭角的所需時間的話他們會需要很多天才玩家
======================
各種吹捧 SKT 啊
想睡了先翻到這,留言也蠻多值得翻的,看大家反應再翻
--
作者 pigmimicat (dsf) 看板 LoL
標題 [心得] 關於奈德麗
時間 Thu Jan 31 03:52:56 2013
───────────────────────────────────────
跑三小 幹你娘
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.217.60
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1444668837.A.592.html
→
10/13 00:54, , 1F
10/13 00:54, 1F
→
10/13 00:54, , 2F
10/13 00:54, 2F
→
10/13 00:54, , 3F
10/13 00:54, 3F
→
10/13 00:54, , 4F
10/13 00:54, 4F
推
10/13 00:54, , 5F
10/13 00:54, 5F
推
10/13 00:55, , 6F
10/13 00:55, 6F
→
10/13 00:55, , 7F
10/13 00:55, 7F
推
10/13 00:55, , 8F
10/13 00:55, 8F
推
10/13 00:55, , 9F
10/13 00:55, 9F
推
10/13 00:55, , 10F
10/13 00:55, 10F
推
10/13 00:55, , 11F
10/13 00:55, 11F
哭了QQ,手腳太慢,感謝大家不棄嫌
話說這篇比之前上兩篇翻的打得還要多結果稿費比較少 GG
只好賣血湊賭本了
※ 編輯: thesidearm (140.112.217.60), 10/13/2015 00:57:00
推
10/13 00:55, , 12F
10/13 00:55, 12F
推
10/13 00:55, , 13F
10/13 00:55, 13F
→
10/13 00:56, , 14F
10/13 00:56, 14F
→
10/13 00:56, , 15F
10/13 00:56, 15F
→
10/13 00:56, , 16F
10/13 00:56, 16F
推
10/13 00:56, , 17F
10/13 00:56, 17F
推
10/13 00:57, , 18F
10/13 00:57, 18F
→
10/13 00:57, , 19F
10/13 00:57, 19F
推
10/13 00:58, , 20F
10/13 00:58, 20F
噓
10/13 00:59, , 21F
10/13 00:59, 21F
推
10/13 00:59, , 22F
10/13 00:59, 22F
推
10/13 01:00, , 23F
10/13 01:00, 23F
→
10/13 01:00, , 24F
10/13 01:00, 24F
推
10/13 01:00, , 25F
10/13 01:00, 25F
推
10/13 01:01, , 26F
10/13 01:01, 26F
推
10/13 01:02, , 27F
10/13 01:02, 27F
推
10/13 01:02, , 28F
10/13 01:02, 28F
→
10/13 01:03, , 29F
10/13 01:03, 29F
推
10/13 01:03, , 30F
10/13 01:03, 30F
→
10/13 01:03, , 31F
10/13 01:03, 31F
推
10/13 01:03, , 32F
10/13 01:03, 32F
推
10/13 01:04, , 33F
10/13 01:04, 33F
推
10/13 01:04, , 34F
10/13 01:04, 34F
推
10/13 01:04, , 35F
10/13 01:04, 35F
推
10/13 01:05, , 36F
10/13 01:05, 36F
推
10/13 01:05, , 37F
10/13 01:05, 37F
推
10/13 01:06, , 38F
10/13 01:06, 38F
推
10/13 01:08, , 39F
10/13 01:08, 39F
推
10/13 01:09, , 40F
10/13 01:09, 40F
推
10/13 01:10, , 41F
10/13 01:10, 41F
推
10/13 01:12, , 42F
10/13 01:12, 42F
推
10/13 01:13, , 43F
10/13 01:13, 43F
推
10/13 01:14, , 44F
10/13 01:14, 44F
→
10/13 01:14, , 45F
10/13 01:14, 45F
推
10/13 01:18, , 46F
10/13 01:18, 46F
推
10/13 01:21, , 47F
10/13 01:21, 47F
推
10/13 01:24, , 48F
10/13 01:24, 48F
推
10/13 01:25, , 49F
10/13 01:25, 49F
推
10/13 01:25, , 50F
10/13 01:25, 50F
→
10/13 01:27, , 51F
10/13 01:27, 51F
推
10/13 01:35, , 52F
10/13 01:35, 52F
推
10/13 01:41, , 53F
10/13 01:41, 53F
推
10/13 01:44, , 54F
10/13 01:44, 54F
推
10/13 01:44, , 55F
10/13 01:44, 55F
推
10/13 02:06, , 56F
10/13 02:06, 56F
推
10/13 02:06, , 57F
10/13 02:06, 57F
推
10/13 02:10, , 58F
10/13 02:10, 58F
推
10/13 02:16, , 59F
10/13 02:16, 59F
→
10/13 02:21, , 60F
10/13 02:21, 60F
推
10/13 02:26, , 61F
10/13 02:26, 61F
推
10/13 02:35, , 62F
10/13 02:35, 62F
推
10/13 03:24, , 63F
10/13 03:24, 63F
→
10/13 03:25, , 64F
10/13 03:25, 64F
推
10/13 03:27, , 65F
10/13 03:27, 65F
推
10/13 06:02, , 66F
10/13 06:02, 66F
推
10/13 06:11, , 67F
10/13 06:11, 67F
推
10/13 06:13, , 68F
10/13 06:13, 68F
推
10/13 07:39, , 69F
10/13 07:39, 69F
推
10/13 08:59, , 70F
10/13 08:59, 70F
→
10/13 09:11, , 71F
10/13 09:11, 71F
推
10/13 09:36, , 72F
10/13 09:36, 72F
推
10/13 10:14, , 73F
10/13 10:14, 73F
推
10/13 10:20, , 74F
10/13 10:20, 74F
推
10/13 10:27, , 75F
10/13 10:27, 75F
→
10/13 11:54, , 76F
10/13 11:54, 76F
推
10/13 13:31, , 77F
10/13 13:31, 77F
推
10/13 20:59, , 78F
10/13 20:59, 78F