以下的內容你可以當作我在豪洨
畢竟這都是還沒確認的改版內容
死亡之帽
120AP,+35%AP
或是
盧登回音
100AP,100+0.1AP,10%MS
你其他的裝備以及天賦符文(d AP)
技能傷害(a+ x AP)
帽 1.35x(d+120)+a
音 (d+100)x +a +n[100+0.1(d+100)]=a +100n +(x+0.1n)(d+100)
技能基礎傷害a在這裡是可以不討論的項目,因為不管出什麼裝備這個值都不會改變
技能係數x,跟角色的性質有關,如果是poke一下的話通常是0.6-0.8,打一整套的話
大部分會在2.0-3.0之間
打出幾個回音n,通常打一套下來n=2應該是極限了
通常這兩件裝備都會第一件或是第二件出,x的值不會超過100
-
好啦,講這麼多大家一定覺得我在練肖話,我們來看一下圖
http://i.imgur.com/CFORD82.png
圖裡面的A點就是兩件裝備黃金交叉的時候,如果技能係數比1.77高,死帽好,否則回音
當然這個範例有夠豪洨,因為這個範例中的其餘ap都是0,也就是你直衝這兩件裝備
-
下面來看一下實際的例子
假設你已經出了一件大裝,d=100
http://i.imgur.com/JluSIfu.png
那個技能係數的臨界值就會下降到1.24(也就是大概丟個兩招以上)
死帽效益就會超過盧登
-
你們可能很好奇,比如說一個係數是0.8的poke技能,到底要出盧登還是死帽比較痛?
(你是俗辣,POKE一下就閃人)
http://i.imgur.com/fAKsD8A.png
答案是,如果你其他裝備的ap少於340,那盧登比較好,反之死帽
(你如果目的只是要poke,出盧登在前期都會比較好,100基傷OP)
-
如果我是個接技高手,我能在一波交戰觸發兩次盧登呢?
這個案例裡面我們假設d=100,也就是這兩者是第二件大裝的情況
http://i.imgur.com/9SAH0nO.png
如果你一整套係數少於2.47的話,出盧登,否則死帽
(勒布朗QWE加起來係數是2.4,
但是W的位移還有等待E第二段的時間內你所有的位移,不知道能不能集滿一次回音)
(但是如果看到你的對手被E第二段綁住,你大概會繼續接到他死為止,
這時係數就會超過2.47了...)
-
所以這邊有個小結論
除非你的角色有這麼良好的位移,那我向你保證,第二件出死帽絕對比回音好
推
05/04 19:50,
05/04 19:50
→
05/04 19:50,
05/04 19:50
噓
05/04 20:02,
05/04 20:02
《淺談技能係數》——民明書坊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.34.88
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1434627125.A.7DA.html
推
06/18 19:33, , 1F
06/18 19:33, 1F
推
06/18 19:34, , 2F
06/18 19:34, 2F
推
06/18 19:35, , 3F
06/18 19:35, 3F
推
06/18 19:36, , 4F
06/18 19:36, 4F
推
06/18 19:36, , 5F
06/18 19:36, 5F
推
06/18 19:36, , 6F
06/18 19:36, 6F
推
06/18 19:37, , 7F
06/18 19:37, 7F
推
06/18 19:37, , 8F
06/18 19:37, 8F
推
06/18 19:37, , 9F
06/18 19:37, 9F
推
06/18 19:38, , 10F
06/18 19:38, 10F
推
06/18 19:39, , 11F
06/18 19:39, 11F
推
06/18 19:39, , 12F
06/18 19:39, 12F
推
06/18 19:39, , 13F
06/18 19:39, 13F
推
06/18 19:41, , 14F
06/18 19:41, 14F
推
06/18 19:41, , 15F
06/18 19:41, 15F
推
06/18 19:44, , 16F
06/18 19:44, 16F
推
06/18 19:45, , 17F
06/18 19:45, 17F
噓
06/18 19:50, , 18F
06/18 19:50, 18F
推
06/18 19:50, , 19F
06/18 19:50, 19F
推
06/18 19:51, , 20F
06/18 19:51, 20F
推
06/18 19:54, , 21F
06/18 19:54, 21F
推
06/18 19:54, , 22F
06/18 19:54, 22F
推
06/18 19:55, , 23F
06/18 19:55, 23F
推
06/18 19:58, , 24F
06/18 19:58, 24F
推
06/18 19:58, , 25F
06/18 19:58, 25F
推
06/18 20:00, , 26F
06/18 20:00, 26F
推
06/18 20:01, , 27F
06/18 20:01, 27F
推
06/18 20:03, , 28F
06/18 20:03, 28F
推
06/18 20:03, , 29F
06/18 20:03, 29F
推
06/18 20:05, , 30F
06/18 20:05, 30F
推
06/18 20:05, , 31F
06/18 20:05, 31F
→
06/18 20:06, , 32F
06/18 20:06, 32F
推
06/18 20:07, , 33F
06/18 20:07, 33F
推
06/18 20:09, , 34F
06/18 20:09, 34F
推
06/18 20:11, , 35F
06/18 20:11, 35F
※ 編輯: emptie (1.165.34.88), 06/18/2015 20:12:01
推
06/18 20:13, , 36F
06/18 20:13, 36F
推
06/18 20:14, , 37F
06/18 20:14, 37F
推
06/18 20:15, , 38F
06/18 20:15, 38F
推
06/18 20:16, , 39F
06/18 20:16, 39F
推
06/18 20:20, , 40F
06/18 20:20, 40F
推
06/18 20:23, , 41F
06/18 20:23, 41F
噓
06/18 20:23, , 42F
06/18 20:23, 42F
推
06/18 20:23, , 43F
06/18 20:23, 43F
推
06/18 20:27, , 44F
06/18 20:27, 44F
推
06/18 20:29, , 45F
06/18 20:29, 45F
推
06/18 20:30, , 46F
06/18 20:30, 46F
推
06/18 20:38, , 47F
06/18 20:38, 47F
推
06/18 20:39, , 48F
06/18 20:39, 48F
推
06/18 20:55, , 49F
06/18 20:55, 49F
推
06/18 21:02, , 50F
06/18 21:02, 50F
噓
06/18 21:10, , 51F
06/18 21:10, 51F
噓
06/18 21:11, , 52F
06/18 21:11, 52F
→
06/18 21:12, , 53F
06/18 21:12, 53F
→
06/18 21:13, , 54F
06/18 21:13, 54F
推
06/18 21:15, , 55F
06/18 21:15, 55F
→
06/18 21:16, , 56F
06/18 21:16, 56F
推
06/18 21:19, , 57F
06/18 21:19, 57F
推
06/18 21:23, , 58F
06/18 21:23, 58F
推
06/18 21:23, , 59F
06/18 21:23, 59F
推
06/18 22:07, , 60F
06/18 22:07, 60F
推
06/18 22:35, , 61F
06/18 22:35, 61F
推
06/18 23:03, , 62F
06/18 23:03, 62F
推
06/18 23:52, , 63F
06/18 23:52, 63F
推
06/19 04:40, , 64F
06/19 04:40, 64F
推
06/19 11:10, , 65F
06/19 11:10, 65F
推
06/19 11:59, , 66F
06/19 11:59, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)