Re: [情報] 球員與球隊的FB/twitter

看板Liverpool作者a111156987 (燈泡)時間12年前 (2012/05/22 01:29)推噓10(10推 0噓 13→)

留言23則, 10人參與討論串108/113 (看更多)

看Balague關於******的消息，Paul Dalglish一時興起談了一些他對轉會跟薪水的看法 (ID黃色的是鄉民們) @pauldalglish A positive of my old man getting his P45 is that I can now comment on current football affairs without having to be careful what I say! 我爸被炒的好處之一就是我現在又可以嘴砲足球了! One of the biggest overlooked factors in football by supporters is players wage demands. Some clubs can afford transfer fees but not wages! 足球世界裡球迷最容易低估的事情之一就是薪水，有些球會負擔得起轉會費，但負擔不起薪水! For instance 2 players cost 20m but 1 is on 80k a week and 1 is on 250k on 5 years deals. Difference on total deal is 44.2m! 譬如說，有兩個選手分別都是以2000萬轉會費簽下，但一個8萬週薪，一個25萬週薪，五年約下來相差達44.2M! Also the media interpretation of money spent. You release a player on a free who is on 80k a week for the next 3 years. Money saved 12.48m. 媒體對支出的解讀也有一樣的盲點，你讓一個還有三年約，週薪8萬的球員自由離隊，意謂著你省下了1248萬。 @THEREDSCOT @pauldalglish you talking LFC players? 鄉民: 你在說利物浦的選手嗎? @pauldalglish No I am just talking generally @THEREDSCOT 不，我是在講一般的情形。 Also money received back on sales. People who talk money spent, not net spend, must not sell their house b4 they buy another. 賣人的收入也應該被計算進去。那些只看支出不看淨支出的人，八成都是先買新房子之後才賣掉舊房子吧。 @carrie3006 @pauldalglish hence rafa didn't spend as much as people thought! 鄉民:所以說Rafa花得沒大家想像中的多嘛! @pauldalglish Agreed. It all depends how the media want to portray the story. 同意，一切都只是因為媒體想要寫故事而已。 @topscat @pauldalglish : ￡13.3m net spend dispels this great fallacy over Rafa Benitez. This is what the man actually spent over six seasons. 鄉民: Rafa時代的淨支出是1330萬，這才是他六年間真正的花費。 @pauldalglish I have no idea what his net spend was as I have no idea what he spent on wages. You can't separate the 2. @topscat 我不知道他的淨支出是多少，因為我不知道他到底付了多少薪水，這兩件事要放在一起看。 For instance, Rafa had to sell players he probably didn't want to, to generate the money to give Gerrard, Torres etc new deals. 譬如說，Rafa得賣掉幾個他可能其實不想賣的選手來籌措包子、****** 等人簽新合約的經費。 @iandickens KD spent 114m. Made back 76m. Considering high-eanrers (Babel/Torres etc), its quite possible he broke even. Correct? 鄉民:國王支出1億1400萬，收入7600萬，再考慮到他清掉一些高薪球員(八寶/******等) ，所以他其實可能是收支平衡的? @pauldalglish Possibly but I have no idea about exact fee's or wages but I would like to try & keep this a general discussion not an LFC one 可能吧，但我不知道確切的轉會費或薪水。我比較想談普遍的情況，而不是針對利物浦而言。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.117.185.27 ※ 編輯: a111156987 來自: 140.117.185.27 (05/22 01:30)

推

armyguy

05/22 01:45, , 1^F

05/22 01:45, 1^F

→

a111156987

05/22 01:45, , 2^F

05/22 01:45, 2^F

→

a111156987

05/22 01:47, , 3^F

05/22 01:47, 3^F