Re: [問題] 請問一題語析
※ 引述《howardawn (arbitary)》之銘言：
The data below is from Tonkawa, an American Indian language of Texas.
There are three sets of words, each built on a stem with a single phonological
represetation. The affixes attached to these stems are [o?] "THIRD PERSON
SINGULAR SUBJECT", [we] "THIRD PERSON PLURAL OBJECT", and [n] "is...ing".
(?=glottal stop)
(a) notox 'hoe'
(b) notx-o? 'he hoes (it)'
(c) we-ntox-o? 'he hoes them'
(d) notxo-n-o? 'he is hoeing (it)'
(e) we-ntoxo-n-o? 'he is hoeing them'
(f) picen 'castrated one, steer'
(g) picn-o? 'he cuts (it)'
(h) we-pcen-o? 'he cuts them'
(i) picna-n-o? 'he is cutting (it)'
(j) we-pcena-n-o? 'he is cutting them'
(k) netl-o? 'he licks (it)'
(l) we-ntal-o? 'he licks them'
(m) netle-n-o? 'he is licking (it)'
(n) we-ntale-n-o? 'he is licking them'
1. Formulate three vowel deletion rules that ae needed to derive
the surface representations.
1) V→ψ/__#
2) V→ψ/__V
3) V→ψ/#CVC__CVC (這我不確定orz)
2. Give derivations(i.e. underlying forms, rule applications, surface forms)
of 'hoe', 'he hoes them', and 'he is hoeing (it)'.
UR /notoxo/ /we+notoxo+o?/ /notoxo+n+o?/
2) vowel deletion -- we+notox_+o? --
3) vowel deletion -- we+n_tox_+o? not_xon+o?
1) vowel final deletion notox_ -- --
SR [notox] [we-ntox-o?] [no-txo-n-o?]
three rules are mutually non-affecting. (這我也不確定XD)
錯誤應該頗多啦，希望有人修正orz
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.221.212
推
03/04 21:06, , 1F
03/04 21:06, 1F
→
03/04 21:08, , 2F
03/04 21:08, 2F
推
03/05 01:23, , 3F
03/05 01:23, 3F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：
問題
2
3