Re: [問題] 夏天必有的冷氣問題-窗型或變頻?
老實說如果你以省錢的觀點來選冷氣的話,那定頻的冷氣是便宜很多的,
就算含電費也一樣。
小弟之前弄了台變電家來玩,測了家中包括冷氣在內的電器,
在室溫30度的時候,開設定27度冷氣,東元MW20FR1定頻窗型冷氣三小時耗1.4602度電,
日立RAS20LF變頻分離三小時耗電0.6754度,
照夏季電費3.02元來算的話每小時平均差0.79元。
日立一台26K,東元一台14K,以一天4小時來算的話要126個月才能把價差賺回來
以家用來說大約要30年。
從結論來說如果你沒開店,能接受運轉聲,不是24小時常開的冷氣大戶,
買傳統冷氣在你把冷氣吹爛之前都是比較省的,
至於廣告或推銷員說甚麼吹個兩年就回本那種鬼話可以直接叫他去吃屎。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.172.101.244
推
06/18 23:03, , 1F
06/18 23:03, 1F
推
06/18 23:04, , 2F
06/18 23:04, 2F
推
06/18 23:14, , 3F
06/18 23:14, 3F
推
06/18 23:16, , 4F
06/18 23:16, 4F
推
06/18 23:17, , 5F
06/18 23:17, 5F
推
06/18 23:19, , 6F
06/18 23:19, 6F
推
06/18 23:22, , 7F
06/18 23:22, 7F
推
06/18 23:26, , 8F
06/18 23:26, 8F
是兩間完全一模一樣相鄰的房間
推
06/18 23:26, , 9F
06/18 23:26, 9F
→
06/18 23:27, , 10F
06/18 23:27, 10F
→
06/18 23:28, , 11F
06/18 23:28, 11F
噓
06/18 23:31, , 12F
06/18 23:31, 12F
老大,我沒有在做實驗,這是我的生活習慣
我平常是這樣用的,所以我測量我使用的電
如果你是實驗室的數據,節能標章上就有了,不用你我來測
推
06/18 23:33, , 13F
06/18 23:33, 13F
→
06/18 23:34, , 14F
06/18 23:34, 14F
這裡是省錢板,其他的優點可以移動到家電板討論
如果分離式沒有其他優點我幹嘛裝兩台不一樣的?
推
06/18 23:42, , 15F
06/18 23:42, 15F
→
06/19 00:29, , 16F
06/19 00:29, 16F
→
06/19 00:32, , 17F
06/19 00:32, 17F
→
06/19 00:34, , 18F
06/19 00:34, 18F
推
06/19 00:45, , 19F
06/19 00:45, 19F
→
06/19 00:50, , 20F
06/19 00:50, 20F
→
06/19 00:56, , 21F
06/19 00:56, 21F
→
06/19 00:56, , 22F
06/19 00:56, 22F
推
06/19 01:31, , 23F
06/19 01:31, 23F
→
06/19 01:32, , 24F
06/19 01:32, 24F
※ 編輯: zaknamic 來自: 1.172.101.244 (06/19 02:29)
推
06/19 03:03, , 25F
06/19 03:03, 25F
→
06/19 03:04, , 26F
06/19 03:04, 26F
→
06/19 03:04, , 27F
06/19 03:04, 27F
推
06/19 07:38, , 28F
06/19 07:38, 28F
噓
06/19 08:46, , 29F
06/19 08:46, 29F
→
06/19 08:47, , 30F
06/19 08:47, 30F
→
06/19 08:47, , 31F
06/19 08:47, 31F
→
06/19 08:48, , 32F
06/19 08:48, 32F
推
06/19 09:16, , 33F
06/19 09:16, 33F
推
06/19 10:03, , 34F
06/19 10:03, 34F
推
06/19 10:07, , 35F
06/19 10:07, 35F
推
06/19 10:43, , 36F
06/19 10:43, 36F
推
06/19 10:56, , 37F
06/19 10:56, 37F
→
06/19 10:57, , 38F
06/19 10:57, 38F
推
06/19 12:15, , 39F
06/19 12:15, 39F
推
06/19 12:30, , 40F
06/19 12:30, 40F
→
06/19 12:30, , 41F
06/19 12:30, 41F
→
06/19 12:31, , 42F
06/19 12:31, 42F
→
06/19 12:32, , 43F
06/19 12:32, 43F
→
06/19 12:51, , 44F
06/19 12:51, 44F
推
06/19 13:31, , 45F
06/19 13:31, 45F
推
06/19 13:46, , 46F
06/19 13:46, 46F
→
06/19 13:47, , 47F
06/19 13:47, 47F
→
06/19 13:47, , 48F
06/19 13:47, 48F
推
06/19 13:55, , 49F
06/19 13:55, 49F
推
06/19 14:23, , 50F
06/19 14:23, 50F
→
06/19 14:23, , 51F
06/19 14:23, 51F
推
06/19 18:17, , 52F
06/19 18:17, 52F
→
06/19 22:44, , 53F
06/19 22:44, 53F
→
06/19 22:48, , 54F
06/19 22:48, 54F
→
06/19 22:55, , 55F
06/19 22:55, 55F
→
06/19 23:02, , 56F
06/19 23:02, 56F
推
06/20 01:09, , 57F
06/20 01:09, 57F
→
06/20 01:10, , 58F
06/20 01:10, 58F
→
06/20 01:11, , 59F
06/20 01:11, 59F
→
06/20 01:11, , 60F
06/20 01:11, 60F
→
06/20 01:13, , 61F
06/20 01:13, 61F
推
06/20 04:47, , 62F
06/20 04:47, 62F
推
06/20 09:26, , 63F
06/20 09:26, 63F
推
06/20 09:53, , 64F
06/20 09:53, 64F
推
06/20 14:03, , 65F
06/20 14:03, 65F
推
06/24 00:58, , 66F
06/24 00:58, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 5 篇):