Re: [外電] Rumors: LaMarcus Aldridge
※ 引述《FSGuitar (fingerstyle)》之銘言:
: http://tinyurl.com/nlmn8k9
: REPORT: Lakers are preparing a four-year, $80 million contract offer for
: LaMarcus Aldridge on July 1
: 各位怎麼看?
從如果要爭取LMA的角度來看,其實馬牛的狀況差不多
他們有太多球員在夏天合約期滿或者是到要換約的時候,聽起來也跟我們去年差不多
所以同樣的的他們也很怕被LMA綁著而失去在FA市場競逐的自由度
換回來看湖人-LMA
其實有個較為矛盾的現實,那就是湖人為什麼要爭取LMA?
不管怎麼去想他就是會打中鋒,因為Randle就算替補,基於兩人同樣會打超過30分鐘起跳
就為了LMA排著偽先發中鋒,浪費錢又浪費上場時間
如果說湖人在選秀會上將陣容的互補性作為挑選的重點(所以Dlo跳過了Okafor)
那又為何要在FA市場找看起來也不像互補的LMA呢?因為他是球星?
如果要找中鋒LMA才會來,本質上就已經是本末倒置了
因為湖人一開始就應該將重點擺在中鋒上
假設LMA的第一句話是"你家有中鋒嗎?",那就再見不用連絡啦!
DAJ vs Koufos , R.Lopez
關鍵問題:DAJ有好到可以比後面兩位多拿一千萬嗎?
或許沒有意外的話,DAJ可能又是個要準備開一年兩千萬的長人,至於快艇會不會翻白眼
甚至小牛到底要專心在LMA還是DAJ身上,也不是需要特別關心的問題
又因為他算是球星所以湖人也要參一腳,或許我們可以先來想想要不要多花這一千萬
湖人是應該試試有沒有球星要來,畢竟這是測試湖人的吸引力的實力
但該在什麼時後抽手以免浪費時間,畢竟也該從去年學到教訓了
如果看不出人家連把湖人當備胎都沒有,那還真是該檢討檢討了
如果中鋒對LMA是爭取要件,那他根本不該離開拓荒者,因為他們有三個中鋒啊!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.173.9.192
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Lakers/M.1435586748.A.EAE.html
→
06/29 22:08, , 1F
06/29 22:08, 1F
推
06/29 22:09, , 2F
06/29 22:09, 2F
→
06/29 22:09, , 3F
06/29 22:09, 3F
推
06/29 22:10, , 4F
06/29 22:10, 4F
→
06/29 22:13, , 5F
06/29 22:13, 5F
→
06/29 22:14, , 6F
06/29 22:14, 6F
推
06/29 22:15, , 7F
06/29 22:15, 7F
→
06/29 22:15, , 8F
06/29 22:15, 8F
→
06/29 22:15, , 9F
06/29 22:15, 9F
推
06/29 22:16, , 10F
06/29 22:16, 10F
→
06/29 22:17, , 11F
06/29 22:17, 11F
→
06/29 22:17, , 12F
06/29 22:17, 12F
→
06/29 22:18, , 13F
06/29 22:18, 13F
→
06/29 22:18, , 14F
06/29 22:18, 14F
推
06/29 22:19, , 15F
06/29 22:19, 15F
→
06/29 22:20, , 16F
06/29 22:20, 16F
→
06/29 22:21, , 17F
06/29 22:21, 17F
推
06/29 22:21, , 18F
06/29 22:21, 18F
→
06/29 22:22, , 19F
06/29 22:22, 19F
→
06/29 22:22, , 20F
06/29 22:22, 20F
→
06/29 22:23, , 21F
06/29 22:23, 21F
→
06/29 22:23, , 22F
06/29 22:23, 22F
推
06/29 22:24, , 23F
06/29 22:24, 23F
→
06/29 22:24, , 24F
06/29 22:24, 24F
→
06/29 22:25, , 25F
06/29 22:25, 25F
→
06/29 22:25, , 26F
06/29 22:25, 26F
推
06/29 22:31, , 27F
06/29 22:31, 27F
→
06/29 22:32, , 28F
06/29 22:32, 28F
→
06/29 22:32, , 29F
06/29 22:32, 29F
→
06/29 22:33, , 30F
06/29 22:33, 30F
→
06/29 22:33, , 31F
06/29 22:33, 31F
推
06/29 22:33, , 32F
06/29 22:33, 32F
→
06/29 22:33, , 33F
06/29 22:33, 33F
→
06/29 22:35, , 34F
06/29 22:35, 34F
→
06/29 22:35, , 35F
06/29 22:35, 35F
推
06/29 22:36, , 36F
06/29 22:36, 36F
→
06/29 22:36, , 37F
06/29 22:36, 37F
推
06/29 22:36, , 38F
06/29 22:36, 38F
→
06/29 22:37, , 39F
06/29 22:37, 39F
→
06/29 22:37, , 40F
06/29 22:37, 40F
→
06/29 22:38, , 41F
06/29 22:38, 41F
推
06/29 22:38, , 42F
06/29 22:38, 42F
推
06/29 22:40, , 43F
06/29 22:40, 43F
→
06/29 22:40, , 44F
06/29 22:40, 44F
→
06/29 22:41, , 45F
06/29 22:41, 45F
→
06/29 22:41, , 46F
06/29 22:41, 46F
→
06/29 22:42, , 47F
06/29 22:42, 47F
→
06/29 22:44, , 48F
06/29 22:44, 48F
推
06/29 22:46, , 49F
06/29 22:46, 49F
→
06/29 22:47, , 50F
06/29 22:47, 50F
推
06/29 22:48, , 51F
06/29 22:48, 51F
推
06/29 22:48, , 52F
06/29 22:48, 52F
→
06/29 22:51, , 53F
06/29 22:51, 53F
推
06/29 22:54, , 54F
06/29 22:54, 54F
推
06/29 22:54, , 55F
06/29 22:54, 55F
→
06/29 22:54, , 56F
06/29 22:54, 56F
推
06/29 22:59, , 57F
06/29 22:59, 57F
→
06/29 22:59, , 58F
06/29 22:59, 58F
推
06/29 22:59, , 59F
06/29 22:59, 59F
→
06/29 23:00, , 60F
06/29 23:00, 60F
→
06/29 23:00, , 61F
06/29 23:00, 61F
→
06/29 23:00, , 62F
06/29 23:00, 62F
→
06/29 23:01, , 63F
06/29 23:01, 63F
→
06/29 23:02, , 64F
06/29 23:02, 64F
→
06/29 23:03, , 65F
06/29 23:03, 65F
推
06/29 23:04, , 66F
06/29 23:04, 66F
→
06/29 23:04, , 67F
06/29 23:04, 67F
推
06/29 23:07, , 68F
06/29 23:07, 68F
→
06/29 23:07, , 69F
06/29 23:07, 69F
推
06/29 23:26, , 70F
06/29 23:26, 70F
推
06/29 23:37, , 71F
06/29 23:37, 71F
→
06/29 23:38, , 72F
06/29 23:38, 72F
推
06/29 23:38, , 73F
06/29 23:38, 73F
推
06/29 23:51, , 74F
06/29 23:51, 74F
推
06/30 09:17, , 75F
06/30 09:17, 75F
→
06/30 09:17, , 76F
06/30 09:17, 76F
推
06/30 10:01, , 77F
06/30 10:01, 77F
推
06/30 10:09, , 78F
06/30 10:09, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):