[外電]LA Shouldn't Break the Bank for PG Help

看板Lakers作者 (飛柳)時間10年前 (2013/11/13 19:04), 編輯推噓34(34推 0噓 37→)
留言71則, 38人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
原文網址：http://ppt.cc/-drQ For the Los Angeles Lakers, whose ultimate goal should be about improving the future, Steve Nash's injury shouldn't affect how they approach the roster. 對於像 Los Angeles Lakers 這種放眼未來的球隊來說，Steve Nash 受傷一事不該影響 球員名單的布局。 The 38-year-old Nash, for the uninitiated, is out for at least two weeks with a nerve root irritation in his back, per NBA.com. But with the way he has looked this season, it wouldn't be surprising if he missed much more time than that. 據NBA官網指出， 38 歲的 Nash將因他的背傷缺席至少兩個星期。但整體看來，恢復期也 可能拉得更長。 As such, the Lakers are reportedly interested in searching for point guard help in his stead, via Fox Sports Ohio's Sam Amico: 因此，有消息指出 Lakers 傾向尋找能改善球隊近況的控球後衛，FOX 的體育記者 Ohio's Sam Amico 是這麼說的： With the news of Steve Nash's latest setback, Los Angeles Lakers general manager Mitch Kupchak is likely to search for help at point guard, several league executives told FOX Sports Ohio. 許多聯盟經理告訴 Ohio說，由於 Steve Nash 近來的不順， Los Angeles Lakers 的總 管 Mitch Kupchak 可能會尋求控球後衛這位子的外援。 "It's not like Mitch to sit and do nothing," said one. "I'd be really surprised if that's his course." 「毫無動靜不是 Mitch 的作風，」其中一人說，「如果他真的這樣，我會很意外。」 But what's the point? 但重點是甚麼？ Even with Nash sidelined, it's not as though the Lakers are desperate for depth. Steve Blake (10.0 points and 5.0 assists in 31.3 minutes per game) and Jordan Farmar (9.5 points and 4.3 assists in 21.1 minutes per game) are playing just fine without him. 即便 Nash 退場了， Lakers 的板凳深度也不至於讓人絕望。Steve Blake(平均成績：上 場31.3分鐘、得 10 分及 5 助攻)和 Jordan Farmar (平均成績：上場 21.1 分鐘、得 9.5 分及 4.3 助攻)的表現可圈可點。 Moreover, with Kobe Bryant's impending return to a roster that includes guards (and sometimes small forwards) Jodie Meeks, Xavier Henry, Nick Young and Wesley Johnson all playing 20.0 minutes per game, it's an extremely crowded backcourt as it is. 此外，隨著 Kobe Bryant 歸隊的時間越來越近，包含 Jodie Meeks 、Xavier Henry 、 Nick Young 和 Wesley Johnson 都有平均 20 分鐘的上場時間，這樣的後場著實擁擠了 點。 And if it's a move that Mitch Kupchak and Co. aren't making strictly for depth —in other words, if they are looking for a point guard to crack the starting lineup and immediately improve the team—it's simply going to be too costly. 而且假如 Mitch Kupchak 及他的團隊不是想加深板凳，換句話說，如果他們是想空降一 名先發控衛，並立刻為團隊帶來改變，這代價將會十分昂貴。 Granted, it's still early in the season, and Bryant's return will drastically change things, but the 3-5 Lakers certainly don't look like a playoff team right now. 我承認，這季才開打不久，而且 Bryant 的回歸會大幅度的影響團隊，但現在這個戰績 3 勝 5 敗的 Lakers 並不像隻能打進季後賽的隊伍。 Even in a best-case scenario—if they find a (healthy) starting point guard, if Bryant looks like himself upon his return—they aren't a team that will compete for a title this year. 即使在最好的情況下，讓他們找到一隻(健康的)先發控衛，而 Bryant 也恢復他的身手， 他們今年依舊不會是隻能爭冠的球隊。 But that's always been the expectation. The Lakers have next to nothing on the books for 2014-15, and this was always seen as a transition year. 但這終究是預測， Lakers 在 14 - 15 球季還是充滿變數，這季終究只是過渡期。 That thought process should remain the same. No moves that might hinder the future should be made. 所有的考量應該維持一致，不能做出阻礙未來的決定。 If the Lakers want to add a cheap option for depth, that's fine—albeit probably unnecessary. But if they are given the opportunity to add a starting-caliber point guard in exchange for pieces to the future—whether that means trading a future draft pick or taking on a nasty contract—the Lake Show should decline. 假設 Lakers 希望花小錢來加深板凳是可以的，儘管這大概是個沒必要的需求。但如果他 們是想添加一名具先發資格的控球後衛作為未來球隊的一塊拼圖，不論是用未來選秀權還 是承擔不合理的合約所換來的， Lake Show 將會岌岌可危。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.71.2.84
→
11/13 19:08, , 1F
Mitch說沒打算找PG
11/13 19:08, 1F
朋友，所以你想要哪隻PG呢？ Mitch 搶給你 反正現在沒有球隊是託管給聯盟( ￣ c￣)y▂ξ
推
11/13 19:13, , 2F
那就是有的意思(誤XD)
11/13 19:13, 2F
推
11/13 19:16, , 3F
Mitch 講的話不要太認真。xd
11/13 19:16, 3F
※ 編輯: lokiishere 來自: 203.71.2.84 (11/13 19:25)
→
11/13 19:27, , 4F
除非換很頂級的人 不然沒必要為了今年搶進季後賽吃爛約
11/13 19:27, 4F
推
11/13 19:27, , 5F
還是不要吧，保持目前的競爭力就好
11/13 19:27, 5F
推
11/13 19:34, , 6F
總板那篇是說聯盟其他總管在等Mitch交易Nash好搶劫湖人
11/13 19:34, 6F
→
11/13 19:35, , 7F
但Mitch本人說目前沒打算交易Nash；這季組底薪軍團就是
11/13 19:35, 7F
→
11/13 19:37, , 8F
放眼2014大計，我是不認為他會這麼容易就改變計畫啦...
11/13 19:37, 8F
→
11/13 19:38, , 9F
很喜歡NASH 私心希望他能拿冠軍 但同樣希望他留在湖人
11/13 19:38, 9F
→
11/13 19:38, , 10F
FA市場沒想像中好搶人 如果真有好貨還是可以換
11/13 19:38, 10F
→
11/13 19:39, , 11F
湖人現在也沒啥好搶的吧,你要Nash或Gasol就拿去
11/13 19:39, 11F
→
11/13 19:39, , 12F
除非有Lowry這種等級的要賣不然還是按兵不動
11/13 19:39, 12F
推
11/13 19:41, , 13F
除非Mitch心念一轉想要打造季後賽甚至奪冠球隊不然
11/13 19:41, 13F
→
11/13 19:41, , 14F
我覺得還是會維持這樣，還不如給Nash養傷XD
11/13 19:41, 14F
→
11/13 19:43, , 15F
除非打得出乎意料的好,比如說明星賽後還在前八
11/13 19:43, 15F
→
11/13 19:43, , 16F
不然應該是不會想加碼
11/13 19:43, 16F
推
11/13 19:47, , 17F
除非要搶大物或是有冠軍級球隊要 不然還是別動Nash吧
11/13 19:47, 17F
推
11/13 19:49, , 18F
有壓力的不是湖人這邊,像暴龍薪資已經衝到第六
11/13 19:49, 18F
→
11/13 19:50, , 19F
他們要是打不好,有賣壓的是他們
11/13 19:50, 19F
推
11/13 19:50, , 20F
誰敢強Mitch. 到是很想看看xd
11/13 19:50, 20F
→
11/13 19:51, , 21F
我們陣中不是高薪就底薪,選秀權也賣光,是要搶啥?
11/13 19:51, 21F
→
11/13 19:55, , 22F
湖人沒什麼物超所值的貨能讓別人搶
11/13 19:55, 22F
推
11/13 19:56, , 23F
底薪戰隊各個物超所值
11/13 19:56, 23F
推
11/13 20:01, , 24F
結果Nash變成教練(誤)
11/13 20:01, 24F
推
11/13 20:14, , 25F
要我說的話. 拜託.把林書豪搶過來
11/13 20:14, 25F
我也想要林...但難度極高...
→
11/13 20:15, , 26F
好處是起碼會有無限轉撥嘛？
11/13 20:15, 26F
推
11/13 20:17, , 27F
書豪太貴了
11/13 20:17, 27F
※ 編輯: lokiishere 來自: 203.71.2.84 (11/13 20:18)
→
11/13 20:18, , 28F
林書豪到湖人 最爽的就是電視會瘋狂轉播湖人了
11/13 20:18, 28F
推
11/13 20:26, , 29F
要林書豪..湖人沒什麼籌碼可以換到他..nash人家不要吧?
11/13 20:26, 29F
推
11/13 20:43, , 30F
要LIN幹嘛 湖人現在不會想吃爛約吧
11/13 20:43, 30F
→
11/13 20:48, , 31F
Lin的約跟Nash差不多 以他目前的表現 不算爛約吧
11/13 20:48, 31F
推
11/13 21:04, , 32F
就算不是爛約也是火箭未來的隱憂 不用搶著幫他們解決
11/13 21:04, 32F
推
11/13 21:13, , 33F
目前的湖人沒意外的話,會掉到明年的樂透區,換Lin來到底能幹嘛
11/13 21:13, 33F
→
11/13 21:14, , 34F
放棄選秀大年的樂透簽,變成吊車尾進季後賽,有球隊會那麼傻嗎
11/13 21:14, 34F
推
11/13 21:17, , 35F
但我覺得湖人沒有不想進季後賽耶XD 雖然找一堆底薪
11/13 21:17, 35F
→
11/13 21:17, , 36F
但教練團或是GM還是沒有很想擺爛拼狀元的跡象
11/13 21:17, 36F
→
11/13 21:24, , 37F
其他人不知道 但Kobe肯定不會想擺爛
11/13 21:24, 37F
推
11/13 21:29, , 38F
Nash QQ
11/13 21:29, 38F
→
11/13 21:43, , 39F
DH表示…所以囉。書豪不會和NASH交換，除非有第三隊加入
11/13 21:43, 39F
→
11/13 21:46, , 40F
Nash如果健康 或許是 火箭想要但Nash不想要
11/13 21:46, 40F
推
11/13 21:54, , 41F
換lin的話天天轉播湖人多好XDDD
11/13 21:54, 41F
推
11/13 22:08, , 42F
lin來湖人 那鬍子.B佛是要各打48分鐘嗎?XD
11/13 22:08, 42F
→
11/13 22:10, , 43F
如果吃lin兩年約那還真的和nash的約差差不多
11/13 22:10, 43F
→
11/13 22:13, , 44F
那我們得拿去換XDD
11/13 22:13, 44F
→
11/13 22:13, , 45F
誰
11/13 22:13, 45F
→
11/13 22:20, , 46F
整個湖人從上到下沒任何地方看起來是想要擺爛的
11/13 22:20, 46F
推
11/13 22:30, , 47F
再怎樣底薪軍團也會死命刷數據拼合約
11/13 22:30, 47F
推
11/13 22:52, , 48F
看到第一句，想到老大反駁大家說誰說今年我們要放棄的
11/13 22:52, 48F
推
11/13 23:06, , 49F
93-95還不是挺過去了 話說那時的陣容比現在還差...
11/13 23:06, 49F
→
11/13 23:09, , 50F
林現在績效能換過來是湖人搶人吧 狀況正好又會跑教練戰術
11/13 23:09, 50F
→
11/13 23:10, , 51F
Lin的8M加上進步中的身手 能換來很棒啊
11/13 23:10, 51F
推
11/13 23:11, , 52F
搶他幹嘛 佔薪資空間?
11/13 23:11, 52F
推
11/13 23:13, , 53F
說真的這裡一堆適合lin的菜 而且球也會在他手上沒問題
11/13 23:13, 53F
→
11/13 23:17, , 54F
一樣的錢能買到這身手的PG 其實完全不會虧XD
11/13 23:17, 54F
→
11/13 23:17, , 55F
不過火箭後場缺人 基本上也不可能丟他拉
11/13 23:17, 55F
推
11/13 23:21, , 56F
等明年自由市場後再說吧
11/13 23:21, 56F
→
11/13 23:22, , 57F
一堆適合的菜 也都一年約
11/13 23:22, 57F
→
11/13 23:22, , 58F
明年都還不知道留不留得住
11/13 23:22, 58F
推
11/13 23:38, , 59F
想不到現在陣容有誰人家想搶耶 XD
11/13 23:38, 59F
推
11/13 23:42, , 60F
0號探員應該很便宜
11/13 23:42, 60F
推
11/13 23:42, , 61F
底薪的很好挖 看看clark
11/13 23:42, 61F
→
11/13 23:44, , 62F
400多萬就跟別人走了
11/13 23:44, 62F
推
11/13 23:52, , 63F
湖人出去的球員是有名的落漆XD 超人400多萬其實overpay了
11/13 23:52, 63F
推
11/13 23:53, , 64F
哪隊不去 去MB帶的球隊 替Clark默哀
11/13 23:53, 64F
→
11/13 23:56, , 65F
基本上球員不太會擺爛 因為總是要為自己的身價打拚 尤其
11/13 23:56, 65F
→
11/13 23:56, , 66F
是簽短約的選手 今年擺爛 明年就難有好約了
11/13 23:56, 66F
推
11/14 00:04, , 67F
隨便找個沒人要的PG阿 說不定又林來風 呵呵
11/14 00:04, 67F
推
11/14 00:17, , 68F
找LIN有點雞肋的感覺..薪資有點太高 不需要幫火箭清爛約
11/14 00:17, 68F
推
11/14 11:03, , 69F
今天打79人的成績 薪資就不會太高了~
11/14 11:03, 69F
→
11/14 11:04, , 70F
反而還超值~這兩天都破30得分~
11/14 11:04, 70F
→
11/14 11:06, , 71F
目標是放在明年的FA 最好能有樂透球員 別再整天Lin了
11/14 11:06, 71F
‣ 更多 lokiishere 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1IWroz7T (Lakers)
‣ 更多 lokiishere 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1IWroz7T (Lakers)