[閒聊] 雖然熱身賽不代表什麼 但有點心得...
姑且不論後場年紀34+38歲(但其實表現都不能用年紀來代表)
從以前看了湖人的轉播
(雖然我是太陽nash的迷 但湖人轉播也是多到一定會看到)
湖人在pg這個位置 10年來都不是組織的重心
會一點防守+三分似乎就是這個位置的該做的事情
導致說現在nash的球傳出去有幾個跟過去太陽不同的結果
1.和平拿到球似乎還會自己想 不會第一時間下決定
甚至有時就投出無俚頭的三分
2.gasol也似乎不是接到nash球就出手的人 也是會再觀看左右情勢
而且我真的覺得gasol在低位應該是他最適合 也是他最喜歡的地方
過去1.2年讓給了拜能 導致有時低位變的拿不到 策應也比較少
變的說這兩年拜能跟kobe打的稍微操了點
但現在howard來 一樣低位是要讓出來的 只能看後續會如何磨合了
當然很多人都會說 熱身賽三場是能看出什麼結論 但是我想還有很重要的一點
湖人如果爭冠 替補與下列幾支隊比 實在是不夠力(遇到強隊說真的)
金塊 熱火 馬刺 雷霆 有三支都在西區
雖然本隊可能有四隻大老二 但其他如果提不上力
難保西瓜不會為了戰績以及教頭位置 在季賽時就把F4每個都操到35分鐘以上
不過也許真的是我多慮 湖人熱身賽聽說從來都是爛到爆炸是嗎...
怕只怕F4加起來絕非1+1+1+1
因為過去湖人球員都習慣了之前的球風 要改也非一朝一夕
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.44.74.185
推
10/15 09:47, , 1F
10/15 09:47, 1F
→
10/15 09:47, , 2F
10/15 09:47, 2F
→
10/15 09:48, , 3F
10/15 09:48, 3F
※ 編輯: zero061 來自: 114.44.74.185 (10/15 09:50)
推
10/15 09:56, , 4F
10/15 09:56, 4F
→
10/15 09:57, , 5F
10/15 09:57, 5F
→
10/15 09:58, , 6F
10/15 09:58, 6F
→
10/15 09:59, , 7F
10/15 09:59, 7F
→
10/15 10:00, , 8F
10/15 10:00, 8F
→
10/15 10:01, , 9F
10/15 10:01, 9F
→
10/15 10:03, , 10F
10/15 10:03, 10F
推
10/15 10:03, , 11F
10/15 10:03, 11F
→
10/15 10:04, , 12F
10/15 10:04, 12F
→
10/15 10:04, , 13F
10/15 10:04, 13F
推
10/15 10:09, , 14F
10/15 10:09, 14F
推
10/15 10:10, , 15F
10/15 10:10, 15F
→
10/15 10:11, , 16F
10/15 10:11, 16F
推
10/15 10:17, , 17F
10/15 10:17, 17F
→
10/15 10:17, , 18F
10/15 10:17, 18F
→
10/15 10:18, , 19F
10/15 10:18, 19F
→
10/15 10:19, , 20F
10/15 10:19, 20F
推
10/15 10:19, , 21F
10/15 10:19, 21F
→
10/15 10:19, , 22F
10/15 10:19, 22F
→
10/15 10:19, , 23F
10/15 10:19, 23F
→
10/15 10:20, , 24F
10/15 10:20, 24F
→
10/15 10:20, , 25F
10/15 10:20, 25F
→
10/15 10:20, , 26F
10/15 10:20, 26F
→
10/15 10:20, , 27F
10/15 10:20, 27F
→
10/15 10:20, , 28F
10/15 10:20, 28F
→
10/15 10:21, , 29F
10/15 10:21, 29F
推
10/15 10:22, , 30F
10/15 10:22, 30F
→
10/15 10:23, , 31F
10/15 10:23, 31F
推
10/15 10:32, , 32F
10/15 10:32, 32F
推
10/15 10:33, , 33F
10/15 10:33, 33F
推
10/15 10:33, , 34F
10/15 10:33, 34F
→
10/15 10:33, , 35F
10/15 10:33, 35F
推
10/15 10:34, , 36F
10/15 10:34, 36F
推
10/15 10:39, , 37F
10/15 10:39, 37F
→
10/15 10:40, , 38F
10/15 10:40, 38F
還有 53 則推文
推
10/15 11:33, , 92F
10/15 11:33, 92F
→
10/15 11:34, , 93F
10/15 11:34, 93F
推
10/15 11:34, , 94F
10/15 11:34, 94F
→
10/15 11:35, , 95F
10/15 11:35, 95F
→
10/15 11:37, , 96F
10/15 11:37, 96F
推
10/15 11:39, , 97F
10/15 11:39, 97F
→
10/15 11:39, , 98F
10/15 11:39, 98F
推
10/15 11:48, , 99F
10/15 11:48, 99F
→
10/15 11:48, , 100F
10/15 11:48, 100F
→
10/15 11:49, , 101F
10/15 11:49, 101F
推
10/15 12:01, , 102F
10/15 12:01, 102F
→
10/15 12:02, , 103F
10/15 12:02, 103F
推
10/15 12:03, , 104F
10/15 12:03, 104F
推
10/15 12:04, , 105F
10/15 12:04, 105F
→
10/15 12:05, , 106F
10/15 12:05, 106F
→
10/15 12:06, , 107F
10/15 12:06, 107F
推
10/15 12:20, , 108F
10/15 12:20, 108F
→
10/15 12:26, , 109F
10/15 12:26, 109F
推
10/15 12:28, , 110F
10/15 12:28, 110F
推
10/15 12:28, , 111F
10/15 12:28, 111F
→
10/15 12:31, , 112F
10/15 12:31, 112F
推
10/15 12:51, , 113F
10/15 12:51, 113F
→
10/15 12:52, , 114F
10/15 12:52, 114F
→
10/15 12:54, , 115F
10/15 12:54, 115F
→
10/15 12:58, , 116F
10/15 12:58, 116F
推
10/15 13:00, , 117F
10/15 13:00, 117F
→
10/15 13:00, , 118F
10/15 13:00, 118F
推
10/15 13:04, , 119F
10/15 13:04, 119F
→
10/15 13:04, , 120F
10/15 13:04, 120F
推
10/15 14:14, , 121F
10/15 14:14, 121F
→
10/15 14:14, , 122F
10/15 14:14, 122F
→
10/15 14:15, , 123F
10/15 14:15, 123F
→
10/15 14:16, , 124F
10/15 14:16, 124F
推
10/15 14:43, , 125F
10/15 14:43, 125F
推
10/15 14:57, , 126F
10/15 14:57, 126F
→
10/15 14:57, , 127F
10/15 14:57, 127F
→
10/15 15:30, , 128F
10/15 15:30, 128F
→
10/15 20:20, , 129F
10/15 20:20, 129F
推
10/15 23:48, , 130F
10/15 23:48, 130F
→
09/11 06:40, , 131F
09/11 06:40, 131F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):