Re: [問題] 請問 Bynum交易的價值?
呵呵
sorry
我看到關於Byum的討論串實在太多了
實在不知道怎麼搞得 是很想笑
就是很想笑XD
很多版友很討厭Bynum的態度
認為他的態度不好 光是這樣就不值他的薪水 不管是現在的16M 還是之前更低的薪水
光是一句態度 這帽子小鞋穿上去 Bynum就很難扭轉在他們的地位
但另一方面
當討論到拿Bynum交換球員時
交易又要求要對等公平 最好是能換到頂級PG
或者是堪用PG+SF
總之就是球隊第二人的角色
這不是很奇怪嗎
不覺得很矛盾嗎
這些人姑且不論是不是湖迷 其實覺得有些可能是X串 但是猜不太出來
嫌貨才是買貨人
口嫌體正直
這些人不知道他們口上說Bynum爛
但實際上推文卻已經認同了Bynum的價值
XDD
不然拿Bynum換Lowry+Scola 或是Foye+Mo
以Bynum在他們心中的價值 這樣湖人不會虧阿
甚至還是賺喔
怎麼還一昧得推文說不要呢 這樣湖人不划算呢???
※ 引述《woo123woo (woo123woo)》之銘言:
: BYNUM應該可以拿到 20M/年 的頂級合約
: NBA第二中鋒 這個價碼應該算便宜吧
: 如果以短期奪冠為目標
: 可以利用 BYNUM+慈世平 為交易主菜 (代表要拿到BYNUM 要吃下慈世平)
: 補強小前鋒 控衛
: 如果以BYNUM為核心建隊 蓋索真的應該要走了 (這個機率比較大)
: 之前火箭那個包 好吸引人...
: 留下 Hill 沙宣 網銀 等年輕球員為主體重建
: 總之BYNUM 跟 蓋索 要走一個 否則不上不下的 沒有比較好
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.137.57.80
→
06/17 14:24, , 1F
06/17 14:24, 1F
推
06/17 14:31, , 2F
06/17 14:31, 2F
推
06/17 14:34, , 3F
06/17 14:34, 3F
→
06/17 14:35, , 4F
06/17 14:35, 4F
推
06/17 14:42, , 5F
06/17 14:42, 5F
→
06/17 14:45, , 6F
06/17 14:45, 6F
→
06/17 14:45, , 7F
06/17 14:45, 7F
推
06/17 14:45, , 8F
06/17 14:45, 8F
推
06/17 14:50, , 9F
06/17 14:50, 9F
→
06/17 14:50, , 10F
06/17 14:50, 10F
推
06/17 14:53, , 11F
06/17 14:53, 11F
→
06/17 14:53, , 12F
06/17 14:53, 12F
→
06/17 14:54, , 13F
06/17 14:54, 13F
推
06/17 14:58, , 14F
06/17 14:58, 14F
推
06/17 14:59, , 15F
06/17 14:59, 15F
推
06/17 15:00, , 16F
06/17 15:00, 16F
推
06/17 15:10, , 17F
06/17 15:10, 17F
→
06/17 15:12, , 18F
06/17 15:12, 18F
→
06/17 15:21, , 19F
06/17 15:21, 19F
→
06/17 15:24, , 20F
06/17 15:24, 20F
→
06/17 15:25, , 21F
06/17 15:25, 21F
推
06/17 15:30, , 22F
06/17 15:30, 22F
→
06/17 15:31, , 23F
06/17 15:31, 23F
推
06/17 15:40, , 24F
06/17 15:40, 24F
→
06/17 15:42, , 25F
06/17 15:42, 25F
→
06/17 15:42, , 26F
06/17 15:42, 26F
→
06/17 15:47, , 27F
06/17 15:47, 27F
推
06/17 15:58, , 28F
06/17 15:58, 28F
推
06/17 16:12, , 29F
06/17 16:12, 29F
→
06/17 16:29, , 30F
06/17 16:29, 30F
→
06/17 16:30, , 31F
06/17 16:30, 31F
推
06/17 16:39, , 32F
06/17 16:39, 32F
→
06/17 16:40, , 33F
06/17 16:40, 33F
推
06/17 16:46, , 34F
06/17 16:46, 34F
推
06/17 16:55, , 35F
06/17 16:55, 35F
推
06/17 17:15, , 36F
06/17 17:15, 36F
→
06/17 17:16, , 37F
06/17 17:16, 37F
推
06/17 17:25, , 38F
06/17 17:25, 38F
推
06/17 17:33, , 39F
06/17 17:33, 39F
→
06/17 17:34, , 40F
06/17 17:34, 40F
推
06/17 17:57, , 41F
06/17 17:57, 41F
→
06/17 18:03, , 42F
06/17 18:03, 42F
推
06/17 18:12, , 43F
06/17 18:12, 43F
→
06/17 18:16, , 44F
06/17 18:16, 44F
推
06/17 18:20, , 45F
06/17 18:20, 45F
→
06/17 18:22, , 46F
06/17 18:22, 46F
推
06/17 18:22, , 47F
06/17 18:22, 47F
→
06/17 18:25, , 48F
06/17 18:25, 48F
推
06/17 18:38, , 49F
06/17 18:38, 49F
→
06/17 18:49, , 50F
06/17 18:49, 50F
噓
06/17 18:55, , 51F
06/17 18:55, 51F
推
06/17 19:06, , 52F
06/17 19:06, 52F
→
06/17 19:07, , 53F
06/17 19:07, 53F
→
06/17 19:08, , 54F
06/17 19:08, 54F
噓
06/17 19:12, , 55F
06/17 19:12, 55F
噓
06/17 19:51, , 56F
06/17 19:51, 56F
→
06/17 19:52, , 57F
06/17 19:52, 57F
噓
06/17 20:36, , 58F
06/17 20:36, 58F
推
06/17 20:54, , 59F
06/17 20:54, 59F
→
06/17 21:12, , 60F
06/17 21:12, 60F
→
06/17 22:05, , 61F
06/17 22:05, 61F
→
06/17 22:05, , 62F
06/17 22:05, 62F
推
06/17 22:41, , 63F
06/17 22:41, 63F
推
06/17 22:44, , 64F
06/17 22:44, 64F
推
06/17 23:02, , 65F
06/17 23:02, 65F
→
06/17 23:02, , 66F
06/17 23:02, 66F
→
06/17 23:02, , 67F
06/17 23:02, 67F
→
06/17 23:03, , 68F
06/17 23:03, 68F
噓
06/17 23:17, , 69F
06/17 23:17, 69F
推
06/18 00:21, , 70F
06/18 00:21, 70F
→
06/18 00:32, , 71F
06/18 00:32, 71F
推
06/18 18:36, , 72F
06/18 18:36, 72F
推
06/19 10:02, , 73F
06/19 10:02, 73F
→
06/19 10:03, , 74F
06/19 10:03, 74F
→
06/19 10:03, , 75F
06/19 10:03, 75F
→
06/19 10:04, , 76F
06/19 10:04, 76F
→
06/19 10:04, , 77F
06/19 10:04, 77F
推
06/19 10:06, , 78F
06/19 10:06, 78F
推
06/19 19:55, , 79F
06/19 19:55, 79F
推
06/21 20:14, , 80F
06/21 20:14, 80F
→
06/21 20:15, , 81F
06/21 20:15, 81F
→
06/21 20:15, , 82F
06/21 20:15, 82F
→
09/11 06:30, , 83F
09/11 06:30, 83F
討論串 (同標題文章)