Re: [2010 Finals] GAME4 Lakers @ Celtics
→
06/11 13:40,
06/11 13:40
→
06/11 13:40,
06/11 13:40
→
06/11 13:41,
06/11 13:41
→
06/11 13:42,
06/11 13:42
→
06/11 13:42,
06/11 13:42
說到氣勢,我是覺得 上一戰贏球而這一戰輸球的傷害並未如你想像的那麼 巨大,
主要是對方 Big Baby & Nate 跳了出來贏了這一戰,這跟上一戰 老漁 跳出來,
在第四節狂得11分,其最大的不同就是對手明明白白的告訴湖人隊,他們不是
只靠雷槍發飆或是KG or PP單騎作戰而已。仔細想想你就會了解,如果這是
第5戰的話,那湖人麻煩可就大了,早一點發現問題就還有補救的機會,不是嗎?
至於老二,10分7籃板已經是替補裡面最好的了,沒有霸男的高度與厚度的他,
好聽一點說是球風全面沒錯,但其實就是樣樣都會卻樣樣不精,中距離不穩,三
分球也只能偶一為之,切入則算是他最有把握的一項,能拿10分都該偷笑了XD
籃板球?今天抓最多籃板的就是他和阿泰了啊(姐姐,你是怎麼了?)
→
06/11 13:42,
06/11 13:42
→
06/11 13:43,
06/11 13:43
→
06/11 13:43,
06/11 13:43
Farmar 防守的問題比較大,明明這麼年輕卻不好好把自己的防守對象跟好,被跳
豆投了兩顆三分球,看起來是還好沒錯啦,但 Farmar 你看看,在 老漁亦步亦趨
的防守下,RAY的三分球可是精美的4投0中啊,人家可是拖著快36歲的兩條腿
在拼老命哪!這就算了,你別老是切不進去還一直運球好嗎?看得我都快吐血了
該跳出來的人?永遠都是你想得到的那幾個而已,不然這四戰下來你有看過Brown
在第四節進過球嗎?(該不會連出手都沒有吧?記錯的話請板友糾正一下) 金逼哀
推
06/11 14:41,
06/11 14:41
→
06/11 14:42,
06/11 14:42
→
06/11 14:42,
06/11 14:42
今天第四節 ODOM 拿了全場10分中的6分啊,為什麼說他關鍵時刻沒把握呢?但
他第四節被大寶貝完爆卻是今天的輸球主因沒錯,下一戰禪師真的該好好用一用他
那很久沒用的腦袋好好想想,板凳上那兩支冰棒是不是該拿出來用一下了?霸男就
算下一戰能上,恐怕又是只有那寥寥無幾的十幾分鐘而已,就算禪師你刻意都不提
GASOL,人家還是看得出來她已經快要被你榨乾了好嗎!!!!!!
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.33.220.21
推
06/11 15:29, , 1F
06/11 15:29, 1F
→
06/11 15:30, , 2F
06/11 15:30, 2F
→
06/11 15:30, , 3F
06/11 15:30, 3F
推
06/11 15:31, , 4F
06/11 15:31, 4F
推
06/11 15:31, , 5F
06/11 15:31, 5F
→
06/11 15:31, , 6F
06/11 15:31, 6F
→
06/11 15:32, , 7F
06/11 15:32, 7F
→
06/11 15:33, , 8F
06/11 15:33, 8F
推
06/11 15:35, , 9F
06/11 15:35, 9F
推
06/11 15:35, , 10F
06/11 15:35, 10F
推
06/11 15:38, , 11F
06/11 15:38, 11F
→
06/11 15:39, , 12F
06/11 15:39, 12F
→
06/11 15:39, , 13F
06/11 15:39, 13F
噓
06/11 15:39, , 14F
06/11 15:39, 14F
→
06/11 15:39, , 15F
06/11 15:39, 15F
→
06/11 15:39, , 16F
06/11 15:39, 16F
→
06/11 15:40, , 17F
06/11 15:40, 17F
推
06/11 15:40, , 18F
06/11 15:40, 18F
推
06/11 15:41, , 19F
06/11 15:41, 19F
→
06/11 15:41, , 20F
06/11 15:41, 20F
→
06/11 15:41, , 21F
06/11 15:41, 21F
推
06/11 15:41, , 22F
06/11 15:41, 22F
→
06/11 15:42, , 23F
06/11 15:42, 23F
→
06/11 15:42, , 24F
06/11 15:42, 24F
→
06/11 15:42, , 25F
06/11 15:42, 25F
→
06/11 15:47, , 26F
06/11 15:47, 26F
推
06/11 15:50, , 27F
06/11 15:50, 27F
推
06/11 15:56, , 28F
06/11 15:56, 28F
→
06/11 15:58, , 29F
06/11 15:58, 29F
推
06/11 15:59, , 30F
06/11 15:59, 30F
→
06/11 16:00, , 31F
06/11 16:00, 31F
→
06/11 16:03, , 32F
06/11 16:03, 32F
推
06/11 16:09, , 33F
06/11 16:09, 33F
→
06/11 16:10, , 34F
06/11 16:10, 34F
推
06/11 16:11, , 35F
06/11 16:11, 35F
→
06/11 16:13, , 36F
06/11 16:13, 36F
→
06/11 16:13, , 37F
06/11 16:13, 37F
→
06/11 16:14, , 38F
06/11 16:14, 38F
→
06/11 16:14, , 39F
06/11 16:14, 39F
→
06/11 16:15, , 40F
06/11 16:15, 40F
推
06/11 16:16, , 41F
06/11 16:16, 41F
→
06/11 16:16, , 42F
06/11 16:16, 42F
→
06/11 16:17, , 43F
06/11 16:17, 43F
→
06/11 16:18, , 44F
06/11 16:18, 44F
→
06/11 16:20, , 45F
06/11 16:20, 45F
→
06/11 16:21, , 46F
06/11 16:21, 46F
推
06/11 16:22, , 47F
06/11 16:22, 47F
→
06/11 16:23, , 48F
06/11 16:23, 48F
推
06/11 16:24, , 49F
06/11 16:24, 49F
推
06/11 16:45, , 50F
06/11 16:45, 50F
推
06/11 16:56, , 51F
06/11 16:56, 51F
推
06/11 16:57, , 52F
06/11 16:57, 52F
推
06/11 17:33, , 53F
06/11 17:33, 53F
推
06/11 17:39, , 54F
06/11 17:39, 54F
推
06/11 17:44, , 55F
06/11 17:44, 55F
推
06/11 18:16, , 56F
06/11 18:16, 56F
→
06/11 18:17, , 57F
06/11 18:17, 57F
噓
06/11 19:09, , 58F
06/11 19:09, 58F
→
06/11 19:12, , 59F
06/11 19:12, 59F
→
06/11 23:01, , 60F
06/11 23:01, 60F
→
06/11 23:04, , 61F
06/11 23:04, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):