[閒聊] 好好笑
Kobe跟L.James兩者球隊體系不同 戰術不同
打法不同 Kobe常是負責終結掉該次進攻的人
而L.James則是球隊進攻的發動點
因此Kobe助攻會比L.James少不是很正常的嗎?
這樣也能戰 小弟佩服佩服
反正只要把MJ跟L.James講的跟神一樣
把MJ跟L.James的隊友講的跟渣一樣
就可以證明Kobe不強?
好好笑
那些嘴炮一流的人到底懂不懂籃球
我就從來不會去想什麼誰比誰強的問題
籃球如果是拿數值比一比 像怪獸卡一樣 那麼直白的運動
那也就不會發展至今日如此蓬勃的生態了
就算真的三連霸公牛跟三連霸湖人對打
三連霸公牛跟 08~09湖人對打
誰贏誰輸都還很難說
72勝只能說明在當時的時空環境下公牛具備那樣的贏球條件
剩下的不過就是個紀錄嘛
(現今難打破此紀錄的原因很複雜 包含交通問題、分區問題…)
如果勝場數多的球隊一定能贏敗場數多的球隊
那怎麼解釋湖人每次遇到山貓就軟了呢?
井上雄彥老師十幾年前就告訴我們打籃球不是算算數了
現在還有人一天到晚拿這些數據啊、表現啊作文章
就算今年對陣騎士 湖人贏了
我也不會覺得Kobe比L.James強
他們兩個都是很獨特的球員 也很值得大家喜歡、崇拜、學習
何苦一天到晚在那邊酸來酸去呢
我想這些道理 酸民永遠不會懂
ptt還是會繼續亂下去…@@
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.231.218.142
→
09/01 22:25, , 1F
09/01 22:25, 1F
→
09/01 22:27, , 2F
09/01 22:27, 2F
推
09/01 22:28, , 3F
09/01 22:28, 3F
推
09/01 22:29, , 4F
09/01 22:29, 4F
推
09/01 22:30, , 5F
09/01 22:30, 5F
推
09/01 22:31, , 6F
09/01 22:31, 6F
推
09/01 22:33, , 7F
09/01 22:33, 7F
→
09/01 22:34, , 8F
09/01 22:34, 8F
推
09/01 22:34, , 9F
09/01 22:34, 9F
推
09/01 22:37, , 10F
09/01 22:37, 10F
→
09/01 22:38, , 11F
09/01 22:38, 11F
推
09/01 22:38, , 12F
09/01 22:38, 12F
推
09/01 22:39, , 13F
09/01 22:39, 13F
推
09/01 22:46, , 14F
09/01 22:46, 14F
推
09/01 22:51, , 15F
09/01 22:51, 15F
推
09/01 22:55, , 16F
09/01 22:55, 16F
推
09/01 22:56, , 17F
09/01 22:56, 17F
推
09/01 23:02, , 18F
09/01 23:02, 18F
→
09/01 23:02, , 19F
09/01 23:02, 19F
→
09/01 23:03, , 20F
09/01 23:03, 20F
推
09/01 23:19, , 21F
09/01 23:19, 21F
推
09/01 23:19, , 22F
09/01 23:19, 22F
推
09/01 23:52, , 23F
09/01 23:52, 23F
推
09/01 23:53, , 24F
09/01 23:53, 24F
推
09/01 23:55, , 25F
09/01 23:55, 25F
推
09/02 00:04, , 26F
09/02 00:04, 26F
推
09/02 00:29, , 27F
09/02 00:29, 27F
推
09/02 00:29, , 28F
09/02 00:29, 28F
→
09/02 00:29, , 29F
09/02 00:29, 29F
→
09/02 00:30, , 30F
09/02 00:30, 30F
→
09/02 00:34, , 31F
09/02 00:34, 31F
→
09/02 00:34, , 32F
09/02 00:34, 32F
→
09/02 00:37, , 33F
09/02 00:37, 33F
推
09/02 01:07, , 34F
09/02 01:07, 34F
推
09/02 01:42, , 35F
09/02 01:42, 35F
推
09/02 01:48, , 36F
09/02 01:48, 36F
推
09/02 02:00, , 37F
09/02 02:00, 37F
→
09/02 02:02, , 38F
09/02 02:02, 38F
推
09/02 02:02, , 39F
09/02 02:02, 39F
還有 130 則推文
推
09/04 10:06, , 170F
09/04 10:06, 170F
推
09/04 12:45, , 171F
09/04 12:45, 171F
推
09/04 15:50, , 172F
09/04 15:50, 172F
推
09/04 17:12, , 173F
09/04 17:12, 173F
推
09/04 19:23, , 174F
09/04 19:23, 174F
推
09/04 20:05, , 175F
09/04 20:05, 175F
推
09/04 20:09, , 176F
09/04 20:09, 176F
推
09/04 21:38, , 177F
09/04 21:38, 177F
推
09/04 21:39, , 178F
09/04 21:39, 178F
→
09/04 21:44, , 179F
09/04 21:44, 179F
推
09/04 21:45, , 180F
09/04 21:45, 180F
推
09/04 21:45, , 181F
09/04 21:45, 181F
推
09/04 21:45, , 182F
09/04 21:45, 182F
→
09/04 21:46, , 183F
09/04 21:46, 183F
推
09/04 21:47, , 184F
09/04 21:47, 184F
→
09/04 21:47, , 185F
09/04 21:47, 185F
→
09/04 21:48, , 186F
09/04 21:48, 186F
→
09/04 21:48, , 187F
09/04 21:48, 187F
推
09/04 21:50, , 188F
09/04 21:50, 188F
推
09/04 21:55, , 189F
09/04 21:55, 189F
→
09/04 21:55, , 190F
09/04 21:55, 190F
→
09/04 21:56, , 191F
09/04 21:56, 191F
→
09/04 21:56, , 192F
09/04 21:56, 192F
→
09/04 21:58, , 193F
09/04 21:58, 193F
→
09/04 21:58, , 194F
09/04 21:58, 194F
推
09/04 22:01, , 195F
09/04 22:01, 195F
推
09/04 22:02, , 196F
09/04 22:02, 196F
推
09/04 22:39, , 197F
09/04 22:39, 197F
→
09/04 22:39, , 198F
09/04 22:39, 198F
→
09/04 22:40, , 199F
09/04 22:40, 199F
→
09/04 22:41, , 200F
09/04 22:41, 200F
推
09/05 00:24, , 201F
09/05 00:24, 201F
推
09/05 01:35, , 202F
09/05 01:35, 202F
→
09/05 01:37, , 203F
09/05 01:37, 203F
推
09/05 06:14, , 204F
09/05 06:14, 204F
→
09/05 06:14, , 205F
09/05 06:14, 205F
推
09/05 20:46, , 206F
09/05 20:46, 206F
→
09/05 22:38, , 207F
09/05 22:38, 207F
推
09/05 22:40, , 208F
09/05 22:40, 208F
推
11/14 22:16, , 209F
11/14 22:16, 209F
討論串 (同標題文章)