Re: [申訴] marriage板主redddd判決不當
rehtra根據以下推文申訴我對rehtra人身攻擊:
→ candyhill:氣焰高歸氣焰高,我可不像爾雅那樣欺負人. 09/11 15:30
→ wilo:在我看來，你是在*[33;1m打落水狗*[m，不就是在欺負人？（茶） 09
推 wilo:喔，我忘了你沒有爾雅那種功力可以那樣欺負人，拍謝拍謝~~~ 09/11 15:33
推 candyhill:我搜尋爾雅文章,也發現多半是*[33;1m打落水狗*[m的居多. 09
→ candyhill:而且,欺負人不是好事,就算有功力也不需要用在這種事情上 09/11 15:35
→ candyhill:wilo要說我現在在*[33;1m打落水狗*[m我很樂意承擔,因為我等很久了. 09
→ candyhill:終於看到她被告,我好開心啊! 09/11 15:36
===========================================
每個人在行文時,
前後句子必有其呼應相關才能做出具體表達.
故看文絕不可斷章取義.
以本申訴案的情節,
1.證據第一行,已指出爾雅為這個片段敍述的主詞
2.證據第五行,在點出爾雅有功力欺負人,再次證明candyhill指的是爾雅.
3.證據最後一行,其幸災樂禍之情不言可喻
其惡意昭然若揭,全部的推文帶有負面情緒化的用語,請組務長裁示之.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.71.198.108
※ 編輯: redddd 來自: 219.71.198.108 (09/17 16:05)
推
09/17 18:33, , 1F
09/17 18:33, 1F
→
09/17 20:12, , 2F
09/17 20:12, 2F
推
09/17 21:02, , 3F
09/17 21:02, 3F
→
09/17 21:02, , 4F
09/17 21:02, 4F
→
09/17 21:03, , 5F
09/17 21:03, 5F
推
09/17 23:59, , 6F
09/17 23:59, 6F
→
09/17 23:59, , 7F
09/17 23:59, 7F
推
09/18 00:22, , 8F
09/18 00:22, 8F
→
09/18 01:13, , 9F
09/18 01:13, 9F
推
09/18 02:04, , 10F
09/18 02:04, 10F
→
09/18 02:05, , 11F
09/18 02:05, 11F
推
09/18 09:48, , 12F
09/18 09:48, 12F
推
09/18 10:00, , 13F
09/18 10:00, 13F
推
09/18 11:40, , 14F
09/18 11:40, 14F
推
09/18 13:43, , 15F
09/18 13:43, 15F
推
09/18 17:04, , 16F
09/18 17:04, 16F
推
09/19 00:57, , 17F
09/19 00:57, 17F
推
09/19 11:28, , 18F
09/19 11:28, 18F
推
09/19 11:39, , 19F
09/19 11:39, 19F
推
09/20 22:43, , 20F
09/20 22:43, 20F
推
09/22 21:52, , 21F
09/22 21:52, 21F
討論串 (同標題文章)