三國志系列定價比信長系列高的原因?
有個疑問,我看了我手邊的三國志12 本體與威力加強版合輯定價2200
而信長野望 天道 本體與威力加強版合輯 定價1650。
差了550
就算是最新的信長 創造的本體與威力加強版合輯,定價也不到兩千。
不知道只是在台灣三國志系列定價較高,還是在日本也是三國志系列定價較高?
為什麼在台灣三國志系列定價比較高呢?
好奇光榮這兩個系列在日本誰賣的比較好?感覺日本戰國是日本人自己國家的歷史,應該會賣的比較好。所以光榮製作三國志系列需要在華人市場賺回來嗎?
這是猜測,我也不知道原因。
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Asus ASUS_T00J.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.26.13.91
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Koei/M.1445016234.A.A9A.html
→
10/17 01:27, , 1F
10/17 01:27, 1F
→
10/17 01:27, , 2F
10/17 01:27, 2F
→
10/17 01:29, , 3F
10/17 01:29, 3F
→
10/17 01:38, , 4F
10/17 01:38, 4F
→
10/17 01:39, , 5F
10/17 01:39, 5F
→
10/17 01:39, , 6F
10/17 01:39, 6F
→
10/17 01:39, , 7F
10/17 01:39, 7F
→
10/17 01:39, , 8F
10/17 01:39, 8F
→
10/17 01:43, , 9F
10/17 01:43, 9F
推
10/17 02:58, , 10F
10/17 02:58, 10F
→
10/17 02:58, , 11F
10/17 02:58, 11F
→
10/17 02:58, , 12F
10/17 02:58, 12F
→
10/17 02:59, , 13F
10/17 02:59, 13F
推
10/17 06:09, , 14F
10/17 06:09, 14F
→
10/17 06:09, , 15F
10/17 06:09, 15F
推
10/17 07:28, , 16F
10/17 07:28, 16F
推
10/17 07:31, , 17F
10/17 07:31, 17F
推
10/17 07:48, , 18F
10/17 07:48, 18F
推
10/17 08:48, , 19F
10/17 08:48, 19F
→
10/17 08:49, , 20F
10/17 08:49, 20F
推
10/17 17:15, , 21F
10/17 17:15, 21F
推
10/17 19:33, , 22F
10/17 19:33, 22F
→
10/17 19:43, , 23F
10/17 19:43, 23F
推
10/17 20:48, , 24F
10/17 20:48, 24F
→
10/18 01:46, , 25F
10/18 01:46, 25F
→
10/18 10:13, , 26F
10/18 10:13, 26F
推
10/18 14:06, , 27F
10/18 14:06, 27F
→
10/18 14:27, , 28F
10/18 14:27, 28F
→
10/18 14:27, , 29F
10/18 14:27, 29F
→
10/18 14:27, , 30F
10/18 14:27, 30F
→
10/18 14:34, , 31F
10/18 14:34, 31F
→
10/18 14:34, , 32F
10/18 14:34, 32F
→
10/18 14:34, , 33F
10/18 14:34, 33F
→
10/18 14:34, , 34F
10/18 14:34, 34F
推
10/18 15:40, , 35F
10/18 15:40, 35F
→
10/18 15:40, , 36F
10/18 15:40, 36F
→
10/18 16:40, , 37F
10/18 16:40, 37F
→
10/18 16:40, , 38F
10/18 16:40, 38F
→
10/18 16:40, , 39F
10/18 16:40, 39F
→
10/18 16:40, , 40F
10/18 16:40, 40F
→
10/18 16:40, , 41F
10/18 16:40, 41F
→
10/18 16:40, , 42F
10/18 16:40, 42F
→
10/18 16:40, , 43F
10/18 16:40, 43F
→
10/18 16:40, , 44F
10/18 16:40, 44F
→
10/18 16:40, , 45F
10/18 16:40, 45F
→
10/18 16:40, , 46F
10/18 16:40, 46F
→
10/18 16:40, , 47F
10/18 16:40, 47F
→
10/18 17:53, , 48F
10/18 17:53, 48F
→
10/18 17:53, , 49F
10/18 17:53, 49F
推
10/19 02:47, , 50F
10/19 02:47, 50F
→
10/19 02:47, , 51F
10/19 02:47, 51F
→
10/19 02:47, , 52F
10/19 02:47, 52F
→
10/19 02:47, , 53F
10/19 02:47, 53F
推
10/19 14:59, , 54F
10/19 14:59, 54F
推
10/19 15:15, , 55F
10/19 15:15, 55F
推
10/20 14:07, , 56F
10/20 14:07, 56F
推
10/20 14:10, , 57F
10/20 14:10, 57F
推
10/22 18:39, , 58F
10/22 18:39, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):