[外電] KNICKS ARE ‘MELO’S TEAM NOW
http://tinyurl.com/7fp3x3l
Jeremy Lin‘s season is most likely over.
對林書豪來說, 這季差不多算結束了
The Knicks announced Saturday that Lin will undergo surgery next week for a “
small chronic torn meniscus” in his left knee. The injury will keep Lin out
of action 6-8 weeks, so the only way we’ll see him again this season is if
the Knicks win a playoff series. And that probably ain’t happening.
林書豪左膝要接受"小手術"得休養6-8周大家都知道了, 所以我們要在這季再看到林
上場打球的唯一可能, 就是尼克打贏首輪, 而這個幾乎是不可能的事...
In fact, there’s a very good chance that the Knicks don’t even make the
playoffs. And that possibility has little to do with whether or not they have
Lin … or Amar’e Stoudemire, who’s out 2-4 weeks with a bulging disc in his
back. 事實上, 比較有可能的, 是尼克今年打不進季後賽, 對這個可能性來說, 林書
豪或者是阿罵能否恢復健康上陣, 對尼克來說就不太重要了
Through Saturday’s games, the Knicks hold a two-game lead in the loss column
over the Milwaukee Bucks. But Milwaukee holds a clear schedule advantage down
the stretch and host the final meeting between the two teams on April 11.
現在雖然還領先公鹿2.5場勝差, 但公鹿剩下的季賽對手相對起來較尼克有利
ps. 尼克先連兩場客場vs上次二連敗想復仇的溜馬 & 不知道會不會有魔獸的魔術
然後跟公牛連兩場背靠背比賽, 還得去公鹿主場做客... 這五場見真章
The Knicks do have some momentum, now 9-2 under interim coach Mike Woodson
after Saturday’s win over Cleveland. But it’s impossible to get a real
gauge on how they will play in April because they’ve been so streaky
throughout the season, sometimes playing their best basketball when their
roster was most depleted.
尼克在武僧執教後9勝2敗的成績還是有些氣勢在的, 但對於四月的賽事來說還是無法
估算會打的怎樣, 因為尼克本季的表現時好時壞讓人無法猜透
Here’s the thing: the Knicks’ best offensive player, Carmelo Anthony, and
best defensive player, Tyson Chandler, are still (relatively) healthy. Lin
and Stoudemire are both defensive liabilities, so as long as Chandler is on
the floor, the Knicks will be fine there (though it would help if Jared
Jeffries returns soon).
這時有個重點, 尼克最好的攻擊手Melo & 最好的防守者Tyson, 相較起來都還算的上
健康, 林書豪跟啊罵球風在防守端較弱, 所以只要Tyson還在場上, 尼克的防守就還
算沒事 (JJ能回來的話當然對防守來說有加分)
The numbers thus far show that the Knicks are clearly better defensively when
Stoudemire’s not on the floor…
下面的數據顯示出, 尼克在啊罵不在場上時...防守的.....更好
Knicks efficiency with Carmelo Anthony on the floor 以甜瓜為主的效率值
Combination MIN Pace OffRtg DefRtg NetRtg +/-
瓜+林+啊罵 417 98.7 99.1 100.6 -1.5 +4
瓜+啊罵, 無林 495 95.6 98.7 102.9 -4.2 -34
瓜+林, 無阿罵 88 96.3 110.9 98.1 +12.9 +22
只有甜瓜 433 95.7 101.8 90.7 +11.1 +84
Pace = Possessions per 48 minutes
OffRtg = Points scored per 100 possessions 尼克每100次出手得分
DefRtg = Points allowed per 100 possessions 對方每100次出手得分
NetRtg = Point differential per 100 possessions 每100次出手得分差
ps. 難怪甜瓜說他跟林, 就像雷霆雙槍...嘖嘖
The absence of Lin and Stoudemire might not be so awful offensively, either.
It will certainly simplify things on that end, because Anthony has yet to
really show much chemistry with either player. Anthony just needs someone to
bring the ball up the floor and have a couple of guys to knock down shots
when he draws the defense’s attention.
沒了林啊罵對尼克的攻勢來說影響不大, 最終問題也將簡化, 因為甜瓜將會真正的
展現出他跟其他隊員的化學效應, 甜瓜只需要有人把球帶過半場, 並在他吸引對方
包夾時能有其他隊友投進些god damn ball
With Lin out, it would be nice if Baron Davis was completely healthy and a
little more nimble … or if Toney Douglas had some confidence left after
sitting for the last two months. But make no mistake about it, this is Melo’
s team now. And whether or not the Knicks make the playoffs will largely
depend on his ability to carry the offense, while also providing some effort
defensively.
林書豪缺陣時, 如果Baron Davis能恢復健康並且打得更聰明靈巧些就更棒了
或是...Toney Douglas在連坐兩個月板凳後還留有些自信的話, 也可以
但別搞錯了, 現在是尼克是甜瓜的球隊, 無論尼克是否能打進季後賽, 都是非常
依賴甜瓜在進攻端的貢獻, 同時防守端也是.
--
清晨霧一般的思念, 清新 double, 美麗 double, 捉摸不定 double...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.250.135.187
※ djviva:轉錄至看板 NBA 04/02 15:00
推
04/02 15:11, , 1F
04/02 15:11, 1F
→
04/02 15:12, , 2F
04/02 15:12, 2F
推
04/02 15:13, , 3F
04/02 15:13, 3F
推
04/02 15:17, , 4F
04/02 15:17, 4F
→
04/02 15:19, , 5F
04/02 15:19, 5F
推
04/02 15:20, , 6F
04/02 15:20, 6F
→
04/02 15:21, , 7F
04/02 15:21, 7F
→
04/02 15:22, , 8F
04/02 15:22, 8F
→
04/02 15:29, , 9F
04/02 15:29, 9F
推
04/02 15:32, , 10F
04/02 15:32, 10F
推
04/02 15:35, , 11F
04/02 15:35, 11F
→
04/02 15:41, , 12F
04/02 15:41, 12F
推
04/02 15:43, , 13F
04/02 15:43, 13F
→
04/02 15:43, , 14F
04/02 15:43, 14F
→
04/02 15:44, , 15F
04/02 15:44, 15F
→
04/02 15:46, , 16F
04/02 15:46, 16F
推
04/02 15:59, , 17F
04/02 15:59, 17F
推
04/02 16:13, , 18F
04/02 16:13, 18F
推
04/02 16:13, , 19F
04/02 16:13, 19F
→
04/02 16:15, , 20F
04/02 16:15, 20F
→
04/02 16:16, , 21F
04/02 16:16, 21F
→
04/02 16:17, , 22F
04/02 16:17, 22F
推
04/02 16:17, , 23F
04/02 16:17, 23F
→
04/02 16:17, , 24F
04/02 16:17, 24F
→
04/02 16:22, , 25F
04/02 16:22, 25F
→
04/02 16:22, , 26F
04/02 16:22, 26F
→
04/02 16:23, , 27F
04/02 16:23, 27F
→
04/02 16:24, , 28F
04/02 16:24, 28F
推
04/02 16:59, , 29F
04/02 16:59, 29F
→
04/02 17:00, , 30F
04/02 17:00, 30F
→
04/02 17:01, , 31F
04/02 17:01, 31F
→
04/02 17:02, , 32F
04/02 17:02, 32F
→
04/02 17:02, , 33F
04/02 17:02, 33F
推
04/02 19:07, , 34F
04/02 19:07, 34F
推
04/02 20:21, , 35F
04/02 20:21, 35F
推
04/02 20:23, , 36F
04/02 20:23, 36F
→
04/02 20:30, , 37F
04/02 20:30, 37F
推
04/02 20:32, , 38F
04/02 20:32, 38F
→
04/02 20:32, , 39F
04/02 20:32, 39F
→
04/02 20:33, , 40F
04/02 20:33, 40F
推
04/02 20:45, , 41F
04/02 20:45, 41F
推
04/02 20:47, , 42F
04/02 20:47, 42F
→
04/02 20:48, , 43F
04/02 20:48, 43F
→
04/02 20:49, , 44F
04/02 20:49, 44F
→
04/02 20:50, , 45F
04/02 20:50, 45F
推
04/02 20:51, , 46F
04/02 20:51, 46F
推
04/02 20:52, , 47F
04/02 20:52, 47F
→
04/02 20:53, , 48F
04/02 20:53, 48F
推
04/02 20:53, , 49F
04/02 20:53, 49F
→
04/02 20:54, , 50F
04/02 20:54, 50F
推
04/02 20:54, , 51F
04/02 20:54, 51F
→
04/02 20:54, , 52F
04/02 20:54, 52F
→
04/02 20:54, , 53F
04/02 20:54, 53F
→
04/02 20:55, , 54F
04/02 20:55, 54F
推
04/02 20:56, , 55F
04/02 20:56, 55F
→
04/02 20:57, , 56F
04/02 20:57, 56F
→
04/02 20:58, , 57F
04/02 20:58, 57F
推
04/02 21:00, , 58F
04/02 21:00, 58F
→
04/02 21:39, , 59F
04/02 21:39, 59F
推
04/02 21:58, , 60F
04/02 21:58, 60F
→
04/02 21:58, , 61F
04/02 21:58, 61F
→
04/02 21:59, , 62F
04/02 21:59, 62F
推
04/02 22:02, , 63F
04/02 22:02, 63F
推
04/02 22:05, , 64F
04/02 22:05, 64F
→
04/02 22:05, , 65F
04/02 22:05, 65F
推
04/02 22:06, , 66F
04/02 22:06, 66F
→
04/02 22:07, , 67F
04/02 22:07, 67F
推
04/02 22:13, , 68F
04/02 22:13, 68F
推
04/02 22:16, , 69F
04/02 22:16, 69F
推
04/03 07:39, , 70F
04/03 07:39, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):